The annual-hydrogen-yield-climatic-response ratio: evaluating the real-life performance of integrated solar water splitting devices

4062 4074 Integrated solar water splitting devices that produce hydrogen without the use of power inverters operate outdoors and are hence exposed to varying weather conditions. As a result, they might sometimes work at non-optimal operation points below or above the maximum power point of the photo...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Sustainable Energy & Fuels
Main Authors: Köhlbach, Moritz, Höhn, Oliver, Rehfeld, Kira, Finkbeiner, Manuel, Barry, James, May, Matthias M.
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: 2022
Subjects:
Online Access:https://publica.fraunhofer.de/handle/publica/439668
https://doi.org/10.1039/D2SE00561A
id ftfrauneprints:oai:publica.fraunhofer.de:publica/439668
record_format openpolar
spelling ftfrauneprints:oai:publica.fraunhofer.de:publica/439668 2023-07-16T03:54:38+02:00 The annual-hydrogen-yield-climatic-response ratio: evaluating the real-life performance of integrated solar water splitting devices Köhlbach, Moritz Höhn, Oliver Rehfeld, Kira Finkbeiner, Manuel Barry, James May, Matthias M. 2022 https://publica.fraunhofer.de/handle/publica/439668 https://doi.org/10.1039/D2SE00561A en eng Sustainable energy & fuels 2398-4902 doi:10.1039/D2SE00561A https://publica.fraunhofer.de/handle/publica/439668 journal article 2022 ftfrauneprints https://doi.org/10.1039/D2SE00561A 2023-06-25T23:43:06Z 4062 4074 Integrated solar water splitting devices that produce hydrogen without the use of power inverters operate outdoors and are hence exposed to varying weather conditions. As a result, they might sometimes work at non-optimal operation points below or above the maximum power point of the photovoltaic component, which would directly translate into efficiency losses. Up until now, however, no common parameter describing and quantifying this and other real-life operating related losses (e.g. spectral mismatch) exists in the community. Therefore, the annual-hydrogen-yield-climatic-response (AHYCR) ratio is introduced as a figure of merit to evaluate the outdoor performance of integrated solar water splitting devices. This value is defined as the ratio between the real annual hydrogen yield and the theoretical yield assuming the solar-to-hydrogen device efficiency at standard conditions. This parameter is derived for an exemplary system based on state-of-the-art AlGaAs//Si dual-junction solar cells and an anion exchange membrane electrolyzer using hourly resolved climate data from a location in southern California and from reanalysis data of Antarctica. Moreover, the advantage of devices operating at low current densities over completely decoupled PV-electrolysis is discussed. This work will help to evaluate, compare and optimize the climatic response of solar water splitting devices in different climate zones. 6 17 Article in Journal/Newspaper Antarc* Antarctica Publikationsdatenbank der Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft Sustainable Energy & Fuels 6 17 4062 4074
institution Open Polar
collection Publikationsdatenbank der Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft
op_collection_id ftfrauneprints
language English
description 4062 4074 Integrated solar water splitting devices that produce hydrogen without the use of power inverters operate outdoors and are hence exposed to varying weather conditions. As a result, they might sometimes work at non-optimal operation points below or above the maximum power point of the photovoltaic component, which would directly translate into efficiency losses. Up until now, however, no common parameter describing and quantifying this and other real-life operating related losses (e.g. spectral mismatch) exists in the community. Therefore, the annual-hydrogen-yield-climatic-response (AHYCR) ratio is introduced as a figure of merit to evaluate the outdoor performance of integrated solar water splitting devices. This value is defined as the ratio between the real annual hydrogen yield and the theoretical yield assuming the solar-to-hydrogen device efficiency at standard conditions. This parameter is derived for an exemplary system based on state-of-the-art AlGaAs//Si dual-junction solar cells and an anion exchange membrane electrolyzer using hourly resolved climate data from a location in southern California and from reanalysis data of Antarctica. Moreover, the advantage of devices operating at low current densities over completely decoupled PV-electrolysis is discussed. This work will help to evaluate, compare and optimize the climatic response of solar water splitting devices in different climate zones. 6 17
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Köhlbach, Moritz
Höhn, Oliver
Rehfeld, Kira
Finkbeiner, Manuel
Barry, James
May, Matthias M.
spellingShingle Köhlbach, Moritz
Höhn, Oliver
Rehfeld, Kira
Finkbeiner, Manuel
Barry, James
May, Matthias M.
The annual-hydrogen-yield-climatic-response ratio: evaluating the real-life performance of integrated solar water splitting devices
author_facet Köhlbach, Moritz
Höhn, Oliver
Rehfeld, Kira
Finkbeiner, Manuel
Barry, James
May, Matthias M.
author_sort Köhlbach, Moritz
title The annual-hydrogen-yield-climatic-response ratio: evaluating the real-life performance of integrated solar water splitting devices
title_short The annual-hydrogen-yield-climatic-response ratio: evaluating the real-life performance of integrated solar water splitting devices
title_full The annual-hydrogen-yield-climatic-response ratio: evaluating the real-life performance of integrated solar water splitting devices
title_fullStr The annual-hydrogen-yield-climatic-response ratio: evaluating the real-life performance of integrated solar water splitting devices
title_full_unstemmed The annual-hydrogen-yield-climatic-response ratio: evaluating the real-life performance of integrated solar water splitting devices
title_sort annual-hydrogen-yield-climatic-response ratio: evaluating the real-life performance of integrated solar water splitting devices
publishDate 2022
url https://publica.fraunhofer.de/handle/publica/439668
https://doi.org/10.1039/D2SE00561A
genre Antarc*
Antarctica
genre_facet Antarc*
Antarctica
op_relation Sustainable energy & fuels
2398-4902
doi:10.1039/D2SE00561A
https://publica.fraunhofer.de/handle/publica/439668
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1039/D2SE00561A
container_title Sustainable Energy & Fuels
container_volume 6
container_issue 17
container_start_page 4062
op_container_end_page 4074
_version_ 1771540894512578560