Arctic Geopolitics, Climate Change, and Resilient Fisheries Management

This article examines the resilience of fisheries management institutions to the combined challenges inherent in geopolitical and climatic change. Increased emphasis on geopolitical considerations tends to make governments more, not less, inclined to seek practical management arrangements acceptable...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Ocean Yearbook Online
Main Author: Stokke, Olav Schram
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: 2022
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/11250/3083011
https://doi.org/10.1163/22116001-03601016
id ftfnanseninst:oai:fni.brage.unit.no:11250/3083011
record_format openpolar
spelling ftfnanseninst:oai:fni.brage.unit.no:11250/3083011 2023-11-12T04:11:11+01:00 Arctic Geopolitics, Climate Change, and Resilient Fisheries Management Stokke, Olav Schram 2022 application/pdf https://hdl.handle.net/11250/3083011 https://doi.org/10.1163/22116001-03601016 eng eng Norges forskningsråd: 302176 Ocean Yearbook. 2022, 36 (1), 440-474. urn:issn:0191-8575 https://hdl.handle.net/11250/3083011 https://doi.org/10.1163/22116001-03601016 cristin:2040750 440-474 36 Ocean Yearbook 1 Peer reviewed Journal article 2022 ftfnanseninst https://doi.org/10.1163/22116001-03601016 2023-10-20T11:05:17Z This article examines the resilience of fisheries management institutions to the combined challenges inherent in geopolitical and climatic change. Increased emphasis on geopolitical considerations tends to make governments more, not less, inclined to seek practical management arrangements acceptable to all; and as this article argues, solutions that can accommodate underlying geopolitical tensions tend to be particularly resilient. Mechanisms that may explain this relationship include interest aggregation, as when governmental decision-makers worry that a sector dispute may escalate and spill over into issue-areas that are closer to core national interests. A second mechanism is sector-gains protection, as when fisheries officials and scientists are determined to insulate mutually advantageous institutional arrangements against the ups and downs of general political relations. Combined with a third mechanism, associated with the “malignancy” of the management problem, including the extent of free-rider incentives among participants, these mechanisms are also relevant for explaining variation among Arctic fisheries regimes in their resilience to climate change—a second test of the ability of Arctic governance processes to adapt to more demanding circumstances. Arctic Geopolitics, Climate Change, and Resilient Fisheries Management acceptedVersion Article in Journal/Newspaper Arctic Climate change Fridtjof Nansen Institute: FNI Open archive (Brage) Arctic Ocean Yearbook Online 36 1 440 474
institution Open Polar
collection Fridtjof Nansen Institute: FNI Open archive (Brage)
op_collection_id ftfnanseninst
language English
description This article examines the resilience of fisheries management institutions to the combined challenges inherent in geopolitical and climatic change. Increased emphasis on geopolitical considerations tends to make governments more, not less, inclined to seek practical management arrangements acceptable to all; and as this article argues, solutions that can accommodate underlying geopolitical tensions tend to be particularly resilient. Mechanisms that may explain this relationship include interest aggregation, as when governmental decision-makers worry that a sector dispute may escalate and spill over into issue-areas that are closer to core national interests. A second mechanism is sector-gains protection, as when fisheries officials and scientists are determined to insulate mutually advantageous institutional arrangements against the ups and downs of general political relations. Combined with a third mechanism, associated with the “malignancy” of the management problem, including the extent of free-rider incentives among participants, these mechanisms are also relevant for explaining variation among Arctic fisheries regimes in their resilience to climate change—a second test of the ability of Arctic governance processes to adapt to more demanding circumstances. Arctic Geopolitics, Climate Change, and Resilient Fisheries Management acceptedVersion
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Stokke, Olav Schram
spellingShingle Stokke, Olav Schram
Arctic Geopolitics, Climate Change, and Resilient Fisheries Management
author_facet Stokke, Olav Schram
author_sort Stokke, Olav Schram
title Arctic Geopolitics, Climate Change, and Resilient Fisheries Management
title_short Arctic Geopolitics, Climate Change, and Resilient Fisheries Management
title_full Arctic Geopolitics, Climate Change, and Resilient Fisheries Management
title_fullStr Arctic Geopolitics, Climate Change, and Resilient Fisheries Management
title_full_unstemmed Arctic Geopolitics, Climate Change, and Resilient Fisheries Management
title_sort arctic geopolitics, climate change, and resilient fisheries management
publishDate 2022
url https://hdl.handle.net/11250/3083011
https://doi.org/10.1163/22116001-03601016
geographic Arctic
geographic_facet Arctic
genre Arctic
Climate change
genre_facet Arctic
Climate change
op_source 440-474
36
Ocean Yearbook
1
op_relation Norges forskningsråd: 302176
Ocean Yearbook. 2022, 36 (1), 440-474.
urn:issn:0191-8575
https://hdl.handle.net/11250/3083011
https://doi.org/10.1163/22116001-03601016
cristin:2040750
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1163/22116001-03601016
container_title Ocean Yearbook Online
container_volume 36
container_issue 1
container_start_page 440
op_container_end_page 474
_version_ 1782330368361234432