A new Russian policy for the Northern sea route? State interests, key stakeholders and economic opportunities in changing times

The 2013 NSR regime was explicitly aimed at attracting international users and transit shipping, but recent Russian policies point in a different direction. Expectations of a rapid increase in transit shipping have faded, whereas promoting the swift development of destination shipping serving large...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Polar Journal
Main Author: Moe, Arild
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: 2020
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/11250/2673590
https://doi.org/10.1080/2154896X.2020.1799611
id ftfnanseninst:oai:fni.brage.unit.no:11250/2673590
record_format openpolar
spelling ftfnanseninst:oai:fni.brage.unit.no:11250/2673590 2023-05-15T15:06:32+02:00 A new Russian policy for the Northern sea route? State interests, key stakeholders and economic opportunities in changing times Moe, Arild 2020 application/pdf https://hdl.handle.net/11250/2673590 https://doi.org/10.1080/2154896X.2020.1799611 eng eng https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/2154896X.2020.1799611 Fridtjof Nansens institutt: 469 Norges forskningsråd: 287576 The Polar Journal. 2020, . urn:issn:2154-896X https://hdl.handle.net/11250/2673590 https://doi.org/10.1080/2154896X.2020.1799611 cristin:1824124 19 The Polar Journal Arktis Arctic Skipsfartspolitikk Shipping policy Russland Russia VDP::Statsvitenskap og organisasjonsteori: 240 VDP::Political science and organisational theory: 240 Peer reviewed Journal article 2020 ftfnanseninst https://doi.org/10.1080/2154896X.2020.1799611 2021-02-26T14:54:09Z The 2013 NSR regime was explicitly aimed at attracting international users and transit shipping, but recent Russian policies point in a different direction. Expectations of a rapid increase in transit shipping have faded, whereas promoting the swift development of destination shipping serving large resource extraction projects has become a top political priority. Security concerns have become more pronounced, but have not impacted commercial shipping activity noticeably. There are tensions between the ambitions for increased output of minerals and the extensive protectionist measures which have been introduced, but, with one prominent exception, industrial stakeholders seem content with less-competitive shipping arrangements. The 2013 regulatory regime was designed to serve individual voyages. The new developments centre around large extractive projects with individual logistical solutions – including special conditions negotiated with the authorities. The NSR administration has undergone significant change, with a dominant role accorded to the state nuclear energy corporation Rosatom – itself engaged in commercial activities. The room for foreign shipping interests has shrunk, but not disappeared. Their opportunities will depend on alliances with key Russian players. publishedVersion Article in Journal/Newspaper Arctic Arktis Arktis* Northern Sea Route The Polar Journal Fridtjof Nansen Institute: FNI Open archive (Brage) Arctic Russland The Polar Journal 10 2 209 227
institution Open Polar
collection Fridtjof Nansen Institute: FNI Open archive (Brage)
op_collection_id ftfnanseninst
language English
topic Arktis
Arctic
Skipsfartspolitikk
Shipping policy
Russland
Russia
VDP::Statsvitenskap og organisasjonsteori: 240
VDP::Political science and organisational theory: 240
spellingShingle Arktis
Arctic
Skipsfartspolitikk
Shipping policy
Russland
Russia
VDP::Statsvitenskap og organisasjonsteori: 240
VDP::Political science and organisational theory: 240
Moe, Arild
A new Russian policy for the Northern sea route? State interests, key stakeholders and economic opportunities in changing times
topic_facet Arktis
Arctic
Skipsfartspolitikk
Shipping policy
Russland
Russia
VDP::Statsvitenskap og organisasjonsteori: 240
VDP::Political science and organisational theory: 240
description The 2013 NSR regime was explicitly aimed at attracting international users and transit shipping, but recent Russian policies point in a different direction. Expectations of a rapid increase in transit shipping have faded, whereas promoting the swift development of destination shipping serving large resource extraction projects has become a top political priority. Security concerns have become more pronounced, but have not impacted commercial shipping activity noticeably. There are tensions between the ambitions for increased output of minerals and the extensive protectionist measures which have been introduced, but, with one prominent exception, industrial stakeholders seem content with less-competitive shipping arrangements. The 2013 regulatory regime was designed to serve individual voyages. The new developments centre around large extractive projects with individual logistical solutions – including special conditions negotiated with the authorities. The NSR administration has undergone significant change, with a dominant role accorded to the state nuclear energy corporation Rosatom – itself engaged in commercial activities. The room for foreign shipping interests has shrunk, but not disappeared. Their opportunities will depend on alliances with key Russian players. publishedVersion
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Moe, Arild
author_facet Moe, Arild
author_sort Moe, Arild
title A new Russian policy for the Northern sea route? State interests, key stakeholders and economic opportunities in changing times
title_short A new Russian policy for the Northern sea route? State interests, key stakeholders and economic opportunities in changing times
title_full A new Russian policy for the Northern sea route? State interests, key stakeholders and economic opportunities in changing times
title_fullStr A new Russian policy for the Northern sea route? State interests, key stakeholders and economic opportunities in changing times
title_full_unstemmed A new Russian policy for the Northern sea route? State interests, key stakeholders and economic opportunities in changing times
title_sort new russian policy for the northern sea route? state interests, key stakeholders and economic opportunities in changing times
publishDate 2020
url https://hdl.handle.net/11250/2673590
https://doi.org/10.1080/2154896X.2020.1799611
geographic Arctic
Russland
geographic_facet Arctic
Russland
genre Arctic
Arktis
Arktis*
Northern Sea Route
The Polar Journal
genre_facet Arctic
Arktis
Arktis*
Northern Sea Route
The Polar Journal
op_source 19
The Polar Journal
op_relation https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/2154896X.2020.1799611
Fridtjof Nansens institutt: 469
Norges forskningsråd: 287576
The Polar Journal. 2020, .
urn:issn:2154-896X
https://hdl.handle.net/11250/2673590
https://doi.org/10.1080/2154896X.2020.1799611
cristin:1824124
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1080/2154896X.2020.1799611
container_title The Polar Journal
container_volume 10
container_issue 2
container_start_page 209
op_container_end_page 227
_version_ 1766338122628464640