Effects of Eight Brighteners as Solar Radiation Protectants for Steinernema carpocapsae, All Strain

Seven commercially available Blankophor fluorescent brighteners were compared with the standard Tinopal LPW as solar radiation protectants for Steinernema carpocapsae (All strain). Blankophor BBH and Tinopal LPW were the most successful UV screens, with 95% of the original nematode infectivity to la...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Nickle, W. R., Shapiro, M.
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Journal of Nematology 1994
Subjects:
DML
Online Access:https://journals.flvc.org/jon/article/view/66700
id ftfloridaojojs:oai:journals.flvc.org:article/66700
record_format openpolar
spelling ftfloridaojojs:oai:journals.flvc.org:article/66700 2023-05-15T16:01:45+02:00 Effects of Eight Brighteners as Solar Radiation Protectants for Steinernema carpocapsae, All Strain Nickle, W. R. Shapiro, M. 1994-12-15 application/pdf https://journals.flvc.org/jon/article/view/66700 eng eng Journal of Nematology https://journals.flvc.org/jon/article/view/66700/64368 https://journals.flvc.org/jon/article/view/66700 Journal of Nematology; Vol. 26, No. 4S (December 1994); 782 0022-300X info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion 1994 ftfloridaojojs 2020-11-14T18:31:25Z Seven commercially available Blankophor fluorescent brighteners were compared with the standard Tinopal LPW as solar radiation protectants for Steinernema carpocapsae (All strain). Blankophor BBH and Tinopal LPW were the most successful UV screens, with 95% of the original nematode infectivity to larvae of the greater wax moth, Galleria mellonella, retained after 4 hours of exposure to direct sunlight. The Blankophor HRS and DML preserved 80 and 85% infectivity, and the P167 preserved 70% infectivity after the sunlight exposure. The other Blankophors (RKH, LPG, and BSU) were not as effective. Key words: biological control, Blankophor, brightener, entomopathogenic nematode, Steinernema carpocapsae, solar radiation, stilbene. Article in Journal/Newspaper DML Florida Online Journals (FloridaOJ)
institution Open Polar
collection Florida Online Journals (FloridaOJ)
op_collection_id ftfloridaojojs
language English
description Seven commercially available Blankophor fluorescent brighteners were compared with the standard Tinopal LPW as solar radiation protectants for Steinernema carpocapsae (All strain). Blankophor BBH and Tinopal LPW were the most successful UV screens, with 95% of the original nematode infectivity to larvae of the greater wax moth, Galleria mellonella, retained after 4 hours of exposure to direct sunlight. The Blankophor HRS and DML preserved 80 and 85% infectivity, and the P167 preserved 70% infectivity after the sunlight exposure. The other Blankophors (RKH, LPG, and BSU) were not as effective. Key words: biological control, Blankophor, brightener, entomopathogenic nematode, Steinernema carpocapsae, solar radiation, stilbene.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Nickle, W. R.
Shapiro, M.
spellingShingle Nickle, W. R.
Shapiro, M.
Effects of Eight Brighteners as Solar Radiation Protectants for Steinernema carpocapsae, All Strain
author_facet Nickle, W. R.
Shapiro, M.
author_sort Nickle, W. R.
title Effects of Eight Brighteners as Solar Radiation Protectants for Steinernema carpocapsae, All Strain
title_short Effects of Eight Brighteners as Solar Radiation Protectants for Steinernema carpocapsae, All Strain
title_full Effects of Eight Brighteners as Solar Radiation Protectants for Steinernema carpocapsae, All Strain
title_fullStr Effects of Eight Brighteners as Solar Radiation Protectants for Steinernema carpocapsae, All Strain
title_full_unstemmed Effects of Eight Brighteners as Solar Radiation Protectants for Steinernema carpocapsae, All Strain
title_sort effects of eight brighteners as solar radiation protectants for steinernema carpocapsae, all strain
publisher Journal of Nematology
publishDate 1994
url https://journals.flvc.org/jon/article/view/66700
genre DML
genre_facet DML
op_source Journal of Nematology; Vol. 26, No. 4S (December 1994); 782
0022-300X
op_relation https://journals.flvc.org/jon/article/view/66700/64368
https://journals.flvc.org/jon/article/view/66700
_version_ 1766397484566839296