Create, Establish, Maintain: Comparing Zones of Peace in the Nordic Area and the Southern Cone

In the wake of the Cold War, regional organizations have proliferated and are now a dominant theme in global politics. This study tests whether explanations for the Nordic peace can help to understand or construct other zones of peace in these increasingly important regional settings. With that in m...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Roberts, Dylan W.
Format: Text
Language:unknown
Published: FIU Digital Commons 2014
Subjects:
Online Access:https://digitalcommons.fiu.edu/etd/1555
https://doi.org/10.25148/etd.FI14071178
https://digitalcommons.fiu.edu/context/etd/article/2649/viewcontent/FI14071178.pdf
id ftfloridaintuniv:oai:digitalcommons.fiu.edu:etd-2649
record_format openpolar
spelling ftfloridaintuniv:oai:digitalcommons.fiu.edu:etd-2649 2023-06-11T04:13:04+02:00 Create, Establish, Maintain: Comparing Zones of Peace in the Nordic Area and the Southern Cone Roberts, Dylan W. 2014-05-14T07:00:00Z application/pdf https://digitalcommons.fiu.edu/etd/1555 https://doi.org/10.25148/etd.FI14071178 https://digitalcommons.fiu.edu/context/etd/article/2649/viewcontent/FI14071178.pdf unknown FIU Digital Commons https://digitalcommons.fiu.edu/etd/1555 doi:10.25148/etd.FI14071178 https://digitalcommons.fiu.edu/context/etd/article/2649/viewcontent/FI14071178.pdf FIU Electronic Theses and Dissertations Peace Peace Studies Zones of Peace Zone of Peace Southern Cone South America Nordic Area Northern Europe Europe Argentina Chile Paraguay Uruguay Denmark Finland Iceland Norway Sweden International Relations Subsystems Systems Democratic Peace text 2014 ftfloridaintuniv https://doi.org/10.25148/etd.FI14071178 2023-05-04T17:40:42Z In the wake of the Cold War, regional organizations have proliferated and are now a dominant theme in global politics. This study tests whether explanations for the Nordic peace can help to understand or construct other zones of peace in these increasingly important regional settings. With that in mind, this study compares the Nordic area of Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway, and Sweden with the Southern Cone region–here defined as Argentina, Chile, Paraguay, and Uruguay–and both are treated as regional, subsystemic zones of peace. Its significance lies in analysis of two developmentally disparate regions not yet compared in zones of peace literature. Using structured, focused comparison, this study is guided by fundamental questions about each region that assess the relationship between explanations for regional peace and their respective historical records. Understanding the conditions that permit the endurance of peace in today’s global context has far-reaching empirical and theoretical implications. Text Iceland Florida International University: Digital Commons@FIU Argentina Norway Uruguay
institution Open Polar
collection Florida International University: Digital Commons@FIU
op_collection_id ftfloridaintuniv
language unknown
topic Peace
Peace Studies
Zones of Peace
Zone of Peace
Southern Cone
South America
Nordic Area
Northern Europe
Europe
Argentina
Chile
Paraguay
Uruguay
Denmark
Finland
Iceland
Norway
Sweden
International Relations
Subsystems
Systems
Democratic Peace
spellingShingle Peace
Peace Studies
Zones of Peace
Zone of Peace
Southern Cone
South America
Nordic Area
Northern Europe
Europe
Argentina
Chile
Paraguay
Uruguay
Denmark
Finland
Iceland
Norway
Sweden
International Relations
Subsystems
Systems
Democratic Peace
Roberts, Dylan W.
Create, Establish, Maintain: Comparing Zones of Peace in the Nordic Area and the Southern Cone
topic_facet Peace
Peace Studies
Zones of Peace
Zone of Peace
Southern Cone
South America
Nordic Area
Northern Europe
Europe
Argentina
Chile
Paraguay
Uruguay
Denmark
Finland
Iceland
Norway
Sweden
International Relations
Subsystems
Systems
Democratic Peace
description In the wake of the Cold War, regional organizations have proliferated and are now a dominant theme in global politics. This study tests whether explanations for the Nordic peace can help to understand or construct other zones of peace in these increasingly important regional settings. With that in mind, this study compares the Nordic area of Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway, and Sweden with the Southern Cone region–here defined as Argentina, Chile, Paraguay, and Uruguay–and both are treated as regional, subsystemic zones of peace. Its significance lies in analysis of two developmentally disparate regions not yet compared in zones of peace literature. Using structured, focused comparison, this study is guided by fundamental questions about each region that assess the relationship between explanations for regional peace and their respective historical records. Understanding the conditions that permit the endurance of peace in today’s global context has far-reaching empirical and theoretical implications.
format Text
author Roberts, Dylan W.
author_facet Roberts, Dylan W.
author_sort Roberts, Dylan W.
title Create, Establish, Maintain: Comparing Zones of Peace in the Nordic Area and the Southern Cone
title_short Create, Establish, Maintain: Comparing Zones of Peace in the Nordic Area and the Southern Cone
title_full Create, Establish, Maintain: Comparing Zones of Peace in the Nordic Area and the Southern Cone
title_fullStr Create, Establish, Maintain: Comparing Zones of Peace in the Nordic Area and the Southern Cone
title_full_unstemmed Create, Establish, Maintain: Comparing Zones of Peace in the Nordic Area and the Southern Cone
title_sort create, establish, maintain: comparing zones of peace in the nordic area and the southern cone
publisher FIU Digital Commons
publishDate 2014
url https://digitalcommons.fiu.edu/etd/1555
https://doi.org/10.25148/etd.FI14071178
https://digitalcommons.fiu.edu/context/etd/article/2649/viewcontent/FI14071178.pdf
geographic Argentina
Norway
Uruguay
geographic_facet Argentina
Norway
Uruguay
genre Iceland
genre_facet Iceland
op_source FIU Electronic Theses and Dissertations
op_relation https://digitalcommons.fiu.edu/etd/1555
doi:10.25148/etd.FI14071178
https://digitalcommons.fiu.edu/context/etd/article/2649/viewcontent/FI14071178.pdf
op_doi https://doi.org/10.25148/etd.FI14071178
_version_ 1768389659498381312