Characterization of dynamic slug flow induced loads in pipelines

The flow of a liquid mass, i.e. a 'slug', inside thin-walled spanning pipelines, produces a lateral traversing force. This moving force initiates dynamic stresses within the structure and is often critical when assessing structural fatigue. Moving slugs in spanning pipelines may be modeled...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Volume 3: Pipeline and Riser Technology
Main Authors: Reda, Ahmed, Forbes, Gareth, Sultan, Ibrahim
Format: Conference Object
Language:unknown
Published: ASME 2012
Subjects:
Online Access:http://researchonline.federation.edu.au/vital/access/HandleResolver/1959.17/56670
https://doi.org/10.1115/OMAE2012-83218
id ftfederationuniv:vital:5252
record_format openpolar
spelling ftfederationuniv:vital:5252 2023-05-15T15:10:03+02:00 Characterization of dynamic slug flow induced loads in pipelines Reda, Ahmed Forbes, Gareth Sultan, Ibrahim 2012 http://researchonline.federation.edu.au/vital/access/HandleResolver/1959.17/56670 https://doi.org/10.1115/OMAE2012-83218 unknown ASME http://researchonline.federation.edu.au/vital/access/HandleResolver/1959.17/56670 vital:5252 https://doi.org/10.1115/OMAE2012-83218 Copyright ASME This metadata is freely available under a CCO license Concentrated force Dynamic stress Modeling technique Moving forces Moving mass Structural fatigue Thin-walled Vibration response Arctic engineering Concentration (process) Pipelines Text Conference proceedings 2012 ftfederationuniv https://doi.org/10.1115/OMAE2012-83218 2022-12-01T19:05:55Z The flow of a liquid mass, i.e. a 'slug', inside thin-walled spanning pipelines, produces a lateral traversing force. This moving force initiates dynamic stresses within the structure and is often critical when assessing structural fatigue. Moving slugs in spanning pipelines may be modeled as either a moving concentrated force or a moving mass when investigating the vibration response of the pipeline under the passage of a slug flow. The moving concentrated force model only yields accurate results when the mass of the slug is small in relation to that of the pipeline; although, the moving mass model should be used instead when the slug's mass cannot be regarded as small in relation to the mass of the pipeline. The modeling of a moving concentrated force is much more readily implemented than that of a moving mass. Thus, the aim of this paper is to identify those situations where the simplification of considering a moving concentrated force can be made, or indeed if dynamic analysis is even required. Results are given in this paper to quantify when the two modeling techniques begin to differ significantly. It is intended that this paper will assist pipeline engineers discriminate between which appropriate conditions to use for either of the two different models of a traversing concentrated force/mass over a structure. Copyright © 2012 by ASME. C1 Conference Object Arctic Federation University Australia: Federation ResearchOnline Arctic Volume 3: Pipeline and Riser Technology 185 197
institution Open Polar
collection Federation University Australia: Federation ResearchOnline
op_collection_id ftfederationuniv
language unknown
topic Concentrated force
Dynamic stress
Modeling technique
Moving forces
Moving mass
Structural fatigue
Thin-walled
Vibration response
Arctic engineering
Concentration (process)
Pipelines
spellingShingle Concentrated force
Dynamic stress
Modeling technique
Moving forces
Moving mass
Structural fatigue
Thin-walled
Vibration response
Arctic engineering
Concentration (process)
Pipelines
Reda, Ahmed
Forbes, Gareth
Sultan, Ibrahim
Characterization of dynamic slug flow induced loads in pipelines
topic_facet Concentrated force
Dynamic stress
Modeling technique
Moving forces
Moving mass
Structural fatigue
Thin-walled
Vibration response
Arctic engineering
Concentration (process)
Pipelines
description The flow of a liquid mass, i.e. a 'slug', inside thin-walled spanning pipelines, produces a lateral traversing force. This moving force initiates dynamic stresses within the structure and is often critical when assessing structural fatigue. Moving slugs in spanning pipelines may be modeled as either a moving concentrated force or a moving mass when investigating the vibration response of the pipeline under the passage of a slug flow. The moving concentrated force model only yields accurate results when the mass of the slug is small in relation to that of the pipeline; although, the moving mass model should be used instead when the slug's mass cannot be regarded as small in relation to the mass of the pipeline. The modeling of a moving concentrated force is much more readily implemented than that of a moving mass. Thus, the aim of this paper is to identify those situations where the simplification of considering a moving concentrated force can be made, or indeed if dynamic analysis is even required. Results are given in this paper to quantify when the two modeling techniques begin to differ significantly. It is intended that this paper will assist pipeline engineers discriminate between which appropriate conditions to use for either of the two different models of a traversing concentrated force/mass over a structure. Copyright © 2012 by ASME. C1
format Conference Object
author Reda, Ahmed
Forbes, Gareth
Sultan, Ibrahim
author_facet Reda, Ahmed
Forbes, Gareth
Sultan, Ibrahim
author_sort Reda, Ahmed
title Characterization of dynamic slug flow induced loads in pipelines
title_short Characterization of dynamic slug flow induced loads in pipelines
title_full Characterization of dynamic slug flow induced loads in pipelines
title_fullStr Characterization of dynamic slug flow induced loads in pipelines
title_full_unstemmed Characterization of dynamic slug flow induced loads in pipelines
title_sort characterization of dynamic slug flow induced loads in pipelines
publisher ASME
publishDate 2012
url http://researchonline.federation.edu.au/vital/access/HandleResolver/1959.17/56670
https://doi.org/10.1115/OMAE2012-83218
geographic Arctic
geographic_facet Arctic
genre Arctic
genre_facet Arctic
op_relation http://researchonline.federation.edu.au/vital/access/HandleResolver/1959.17/56670
vital:5252
https://doi.org/10.1115/OMAE2012-83218
op_rights Copyright ASME
This metadata is freely available under a CCO license
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1115/OMAE2012-83218
container_title Volume 3: Pipeline and Riser Technology
container_start_page 185
op_container_end_page 197
_version_ 1766341116586622976