Factors behind the variability of phosphorus accumulation in Finnish lakes

• Published in: Journal of Soils and Sediments
• Main Authors: Tammeorg, Olga, Haldna, Marina, Nõges, Peeter, Appleby, Peter, Möls, Tõnu, Niemistö, Juha, Tammeorg, Priit, Horppila, Jukka
• Other Authors: Centre for Limnology
• Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
• Language: unknown
• Published: Springer 2018
• Subjects: lake characteristics; lakes; NAO; phosphorus accumulation rate; phosphorus retention; articles; Discussion Lake; North Atlantic; North Atlantic oscillation
• Online Access: http://hdl.handle.net/10492/7848; https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-018-1973-8

Purpose Phosphorus retention (TPacc) is one of the major water quality regulators in lakes. The current study aimed at ascer- taining the specific lake characteristics regulating TP acc . Moreover, we were interested whether NAO (North Atlantic Oscillation), a proxy of climatic forcing, can explain variability in TPacc, additionally to that ascribed to lake characteristics. Materials and methods Sediment cores were obtained from 21 Finnish lakes, subject to radiometric dating and measurements of TP concentrations. Principal components (PCs) were generated using lake characteristics that are usually included into the modelling of TPacc (e.g. lake area, lake depth, catchment area, P inflow) but also the parameters that the classical models usually missed (e.g. anoxic factor). We used significant principal components (PCs), specific combinations of lake characteristics and monthly NAO values as predictors of TPacc. Results and discussion Lake characteristics explained the bulk of TPacc variability. The most influential factors (positive drivers) behind TPacc included PC1 (representing mainly deep lakes), PC2 (small lakes with high levels of anoxia and water column stability), PC3 (productive lakes with large catchment area and short water residence time), PC4 (lakes with high water column stability, low anoxic factor and relatively high sediment focusing) and PC5 (lakes with high levels of P inflow, anoxia and long water residence time). Additionally, we found a potential negative effect of NAO in October on the annual TPacc. This NAO was significantly positively related to temperatures in surface and near-bottom water layer (also their difference) in autumn, suggest- ing the possible implications for the internal P dynamics. Increased mineralization of organic matter is the most likely explanation for the reduced TPacc associated with NAO-driven water temperature increase. Conclusions The analysis presented here contributes to the knowledge of the factors controlling P retention. Moreover, this spatially and ...