Our Spiritual Relations : Challenging Settler Colonial Possessiveness of Indigenous Spirituality/Religion

Indigenous spirituality is often appropriated and deployed in support of white settler values that possess and dispossess Indigenous knowledges, materiality, and socio-political relations. As Kim TallBear explains, this settler property regime maintains a colonial exceptionalism that justifies settl...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Anthropologica
Main Authors: LeBlanc, Jeanine, Gareau, Paul L.
Format: Text
Language:English
Published: University of Victoria 2023
Subjects:
Online Access:http://id.erudit.org/iderudit/1109802ar
https://doi.org/10.18357/anthropologica65120232599
id fterudit:oai:erudit.org:1109802ar
record_format openpolar
spelling fterudit:oai:erudit.org:1109802ar 2024-04-28T08:28:25+00:00 Our Spiritual Relations : Challenging Settler Colonial Possessiveness of Indigenous Spirituality/Religion LeBlanc, Jeanine Gareau, Paul L. 2023 http://id.erudit.org/iderudit/1109802ar https://doi.org/10.18357/anthropologica65120232599 en eng University of Victoria Érudit Anthropologica vol. 65 no. 1 (2023) http://id.erudit.org/iderudit/1109802ar doi:10.18357/anthropologica65120232599 © JeanineLeBlanc and PaulL.Gareau, 2024 Indigenous spirituality/religion white possessiveness eroticanalysis Indigenous feminisms research creation self-portraiture archives nationhood/peoplehood kinship governance Mi’kmaq Nation Métis Nation spiritualité et religion autochtone possessivité blanche analyse érotique féminismes autochtones création de recherche autoportrait nation/peuple gouvernance de la parenté nation mi’kmaq nation métisse text 2023 fterudit https://doi.org/10.18357/anthropologica65120232599 2024-04-10T00:05:02Z Indigenous spirituality is often appropriated and deployed in support of white settler values that possess and dispossess Indigenous knowledges, materiality, and socio-political relations. As Kim TallBear explains, this settler property regime maintains a colonial exceptionalism that justifies settler naturalization to Indigenous territories. Indigenous spirituality/religion represents situated knowledges and socio-political relations that cannot be abstracted from collective and co-constitutive relations. LeBlanc and Gareau turn to their respective communities to articulate how relations are central to understanding Indigenous spirituality/religion. LeBlanc employs Savage (Tracy) Bear’s eroticanalysis to see Mi’kmaq women’s spiritual/religious relations in the settler archives as well as situate herself in these relations through photographic self-portraiture. Gareau unpacks the spiritual/religious relations of the Métis fiddle in Maria Campbell’s Road Allowance story of “La Beau Sha Shoo” where a Métis fiddler dies and goes to heaven to drink and visit with Jesus. Throughout, spirituality/religion represents the self-determination of separate but related collective and co-constitutive nations/peoples. La spiritualité autochtone est souvent détournée et déployée pour soutenir les valeurs des colons blancs qui possèdent et dépossèdent les savoirs, la matérialité et les relations sociopolitiques autochtones. Comme l’explique Kim TallBear, ce régime de propriété des colons maintient un exceptionnalisme colonial qui justifie la naturalisation des territoires autochtones par les colons. La spiritualité/religion autochtone représente des connaissances et des relations sociopolitiques situées qui ne peuvent être abstraites des relations collectives et co-constitutives. LeBlanc et Gareau se tournent vers leurs communautés respectives pour expliquer comment les relations sont essentielles à la compréhension de la spiritualité/religion autochtone. LeBlanc utilise l’analyse érotique de Savage (Tracy) Bear pour voir les ... Text Mi’kmaq Érudit.org (Université Montréal) Anthropologica 65 1
institution Open Polar
collection Érudit.org (Université Montréal)
op_collection_id fterudit
language English
topic Indigenous spirituality/religion
white possessiveness
eroticanalysis
Indigenous feminisms
research creation
self-portraiture
archives
nationhood/peoplehood
kinship governance
Mi’kmaq Nation
Métis Nation
spiritualité et religion autochtone
possessivité blanche
analyse érotique
féminismes autochtones
création de recherche
autoportrait
nation/peuple
gouvernance de la parenté
nation mi’kmaq
nation métisse
spellingShingle Indigenous spirituality/religion
white possessiveness
eroticanalysis
Indigenous feminisms
research creation
self-portraiture
archives
nationhood/peoplehood
kinship governance
Mi’kmaq Nation
Métis Nation
spiritualité et religion autochtone
possessivité blanche
analyse érotique
féminismes autochtones
création de recherche
autoportrait
nation/peuple
gouvernance de la parenté
nation mi’kmaq
nation métisse
LeBlanc, Jeanine
Gareau, Paul L.
Our Spiritual Relations : Challenging Settler Colonial Possessiveness of Indigenous Spirituality/Religion
topic_facet Indigenous spirituality/religion
white possessiveness
eroticanalysis
Indigenous feminisms
research creation
self-portraiture
archives
nationhood/peoplehood
kinship governance
Mi’kmaq Nation
Métis Nation
spiritualité et religion autochtone
possessivité blanche
analyse érotique
féminismes autochtones
création de recherche
autoportrait
nation/peuple
gouvernance de la parenté
nation mi’kmaq
nation métisse
description Indigenous spirituality is often appropriated and deployed in support of white settler values that possess and dispossess Indigenous knowledges, materiality, and socio-political relations. As Kim TallBear explains, this settler property regime maintains a colonial exceptionalism that justifies settler naturalization to Indigenous territories. Indigenous spirituality/religion represents situated knowledges and socio-political relations that cannot be abstracted from collective and co-constitutive relations. LeBlanc and Gareau turn to their respective communities to articulate how relations are central to understanding Indigenous spirituality/religion. LeBlanc employs Savage (Tracy) Bear’s eroticanalysis to see Mi’kmaq women’s spiritual/religious relations in the settler archives as well as situate herself in these relations through photographic self-portraiture. Gareau unpacks the spiritual/religious relations of the Métis fiddle in Maria Campbell’s Road Allowance story of “La Beau Sha Shoo” where a Métis fiddler dies and goes to heaven to drink and visit with Jesus. Throughout, spirituality/religion represents the self-determination of separate but related collective and co-constitutive nations/peoples. La spiritualité autochtone est souvent détournée et déployée pour soutenir les valeurs des colons blancs qui possèdent et dépossèdent les savoirs, la matérialité et les relations sociopolitiques autochtones. Comme l’explique Kim TallBear, ce régime de propriété des colons maintient un exceptionnalisme colonial qui justifie la naturalisation des territoires autochtones par les colons. La spiritualité/religion autochtone représente des connaissances et des relations sociopolitiques situées qui ne peuvent être abstraites des relations collectives et co-constitutives. LeBlanc et Gareau se tournent vers leurs communautés respectives pour expliquer comment les relations sont essentielles à la compréhension de la spiritualité/religion autochtone. LeBlanc utilise l’analyse érotique de Savage (Tracy) Bear pour voir les ...
format Text
author LeBlanc, Jeanine
Gareau, Paul L.
author_facet LeBlanc, Jeanine
Gareau, Paul L.
author_sort LeBlanc, Jeanine
title Our Spiritual Relations : Challenging Settler Colonial Possessiveness of Indigenous Spirituality/Religion
title_short Our Spiritual Relations : Challenging Settler Colonial Possessiveness of Indigenous Spirituality/Religion
title_full Our Spiritual Relations : Challenging Settler Colonial Possessiveness of Indigenous Spirituality/Religion
title_fullStr Our Spiritual Relations : Challenging Settler Colonial Possessiveness of Indigenous Spirituality/Religion
title_full_unstemmed Our Spiritual Relations : Challenging Settler Colonial Possessiveness of Indigenous Spirituality/Religion
title_sort our spiritual relations : challenging settler colonial possessiveness of indigenous spirituality/religion
publisher University of Victoria
publishDate 2023
url http://id.erudit.org/iderudit/1109802ar
https://doi.org/10.18357/anthropologica65120232599
genre Mi’kmaq
genre_facet Mi’kmaq
op_relation Anthropologica
vol. 65 no. 1 (2023)
http://id.erudit.org/iderudit/1109802ar
doi:10.18357/anthropologica65120232599
op_rights © JeanineLeBlanc and PaulL.Gareau, 2024
op_doi https://doi.org/10.18357/anthropologica65120232599
container_title Anthropologica
container_volume 65
container_issue 1
_version_ 1797586962105761792