Whose agenda is it? Regulating health research ethics in Labrador
In Labrador, the NunatuKavut (formerly Labrador Inuit Métis) have begun to introduce a rigorous community-based research review process. We conducted a study with leaders and health care workers in and beyond the NunatuKavut community of Labrador, asking them what should be emphasised in a community...
Published in: | Études/Inuit/Studies |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Text |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Association Inuksiutiit Katimajiit Inc.
2011
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://id.erudit.org/iderudit/1012838ar https://doi.org/10.7202/1012838ar |
id |
fterudit:oai:erudit.org:1012838ar |
---|---|
record_format |
openpolar |
spelling |
fterudit:oai:erudit.org:1012838ar 2023-05-15T16:08:12+02:00 Whose agenda is it? Regulating health research ethics in Labrador Brunger, Fern Bull, Julie 2011 http://id.erudit.org/iderudit/1012838ar https://doi.org/10.7202/1012838ar en eng Association Inuksiutiit Katimajiit Inc. Centre interuniversitaire d’études et de recherches autochtones (CIÉRA) Érudit Études/Inuit/Studies vol. 35 no. 1-2 (2011) http://id.erudit.org/iderudit/1012838ar doi:10.7202/1012838ar Tous droits réservés © La revue Études/Inuit/Studies, 2011 text 2011 fterudit https://doi.org/10.7202/1012838ar 2022-09-24T23:14:52Z In Labrador, the NunatuKavut (formerly Labrador Inuit Métis) have begun to introduce a rigorous community-based research review process. We conducted a study with leaders and health care workers in and beyond the NunatuKavut community of Labrador, asking them what should be emphasised in a community review. We also sought to identify whether and how community review should be distinct from the centralised, “institutional” research ethics review that would be the mandate of Newfoundland and Labrador’s impending provincial health research authority. In this article we report on our findings with the aim of providing strategies and direction for researchers, research ethics boards, and Aboriginal communities dealing with dual-level ethics review. We argue for the adoption and use of a consistent label for community review of research (“Community Research Review Committee”) as distinct from research ethics boards. We provide suggestions for the development of separate roles and responsibilities for community review of research to ensure that its tasks are clearly understood and delineated. Our objective is to promote a form of community research review, distinct from the “ethics” review of research ethics boards, that explicitly attends to research in the context of ongoing colonialism, assimilation, and exoticism. Au Labrador, les NunatuKavut (auparavant appelés les Métis Inuit du Labrador) ont commencé à établir un rigoureux processus communautaire d’évaluation de la recherche. Nous avons mené une étude avec des gestionnaires et des travailleurs en santé de la communauté nunatukavut du Labrador et au-delà, en leur demandant ce qui devrait être mis en valeur au cours d’une évaluation communautaire. Nous avons également cherché à identifier si, et comment, une évaluation communautaire devait être distincte des évaluations «institutionnelles» d’éthique de la recherche qui restent l’apanage des autorités provinciales de Terre-Neuve et du Labrador en matière de recherche en santé. Dans cet article, nous présentons ... Text Études/Inuit/Studies inuit Newfoundland Terre-Neuve Érudit.org (Université Montréal) Newfoundland Études/Inuit/Studies 35 1-2 127 142 |
institution |
Open Polar |
collection |
Érudit.org (Université Montréal) |
op_collection_id |
fterudit |
language |
English |
description |
In Labrador, the NunatuKavut (formerly Labrador Inuit Métis) have begun to introduce a rigorous community-based research review process. We conducted a study with leaders and health care workers in and beyond the NunatuKavut community of Labrador, asking them what should be emphasised in a community review. We also sought to identify whether and how community review should be distinct from the centralised, “institutional” research ethics review that would be the mandate of Newfoundland and Labrador’s impending provincial health research authority. In this article we report on our findings with the aim of providing strategies and direction for researchers, research ethics boards, and Aboriginal communities dealing with dual-level ethics review. We argue for the adoption and use of a consistent label for community review of research (“Community Research Review Committee”) as distinct from research ethics boards. We provide suggestions for the development of separate roles and responsibilities for community review of research to ensure that its tasks are clearly understood and delineated. Our objective is to promote a form of community research review, distinct from the “ethics” review of research ethics boards, that explicitly attends to research in the context of ongoing colonialism, assimilation, and exoticism. Au Labrador, les NunatuKavut (auparavant appelés les Métis Inuit du Labrador) ont commencé à établir un rigoureux processus communautaire d’évaluation de la recherche. Nous avons mené une étude avec des gestionnaires et des travailleurs en santé de la communauté nunatukavut du Labrador et au-delà, en leur demandant ce qui devrait être mis en valeur au cours d’une évaluation communautaire. Nous avons également cherché à identifier si, et comment, une évaluation communautaire devait être distincte des évaluations «institutionnelles» d’éthique de la recherche qui restent l’apanage des autorités provinciales de Terre-Neuve et du Labrador en matière de recherche en santé. Dans cet article, nous présentons ... |
format |
Text |
author |
Brunger, Fern Bull, Julie |
spellingShingle |
Brunger, Fern Bull, Julie Whose agenda is it? Regulating health research ethics in Labrador |
author_facet |
Brunger, Fern Bull, Julie |
author_sort |
Brunger, Fern |
title |
Whose agenda is it? Regulating health research ethics in Labrador |
title_short |
Whose agenda is it? Regulating health research ethics in Labrador |
title_full |
Whose agenda is it? Regulating health research ethics in Labrador |
title_fullStr |
Whose agenda is it? Regulating health research ethics in Labrador |
title_full_unstemmed |
Whose agenda is it? Regulating health research ethics in Labrador |
title_sort |
whose agenda is it? regulating health research ethics in labrador |
publisher |
Association Inuksiutiit Katimajiit Inc. |
publishDate |
2011 |
url |
http://id.erudit.org/iderudit/1012838ar https://doi.org/10.7202/1012838ar |
geographic |
Newfoundland |
geographic_facet |
Newfoundland |
genre |
Études/Inuit/Studies inuit Newfoundland Terre-Neuve |
genre_facet |
Études/Inuit/Studies inuit Newfoundland Terre-Neuve |
op_relation |
Études/Inuit/Studies vol. 35 no. 1-2 (2011) http://id.erudit.org/iderudit/1012838ar doi:10.7202/1012838ar |
op_rights |
Tous droits réservés © La revue Études/Inuit/Studies, 2011 |
op_doi |
https://doi.org/10.7202/1012838ar |
container_title |
Études/Inuit/Studies |
container_volume |
35 |
container_issue |
1-2 |
container_start_page |
127 |
op_container_end_page |
142 |
_version_ |
1766404255903645696 |