DOES NITROGEN PARTITIONING PROMOTE SPECIES DIVERSITY IN ARCTIC TUSSOCK TUNDRA?

We used 15N soil-labeling techniques to examine how the dominant species in a N-limited, tussock tundra plant community partitioned soil N, and how such partitioning may contribute to community organization. The five most productive species were well differentiated with respect to the chemical form...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: R McKane, L Johnson, G Shaver, K Nadelhoffer, E Rastetter, B Fry, A Giblin, K Kielland, B Kwiatkowski, J Laundre, G Murray, P Beedlow
Format: Text
Language:unknown
Published: 2005
Subjects:
Online Access:http://oaspub.epa.gov/eims/eimsapi.dispdetail?deid=61966
id ftepa:oai:epaEIMS:61966
record_format openpolar
spelling ftepa:oai:epaEIMS:61966 2023-05-15T15:06:15+02:00 DOES NITROGEN PARTITIONING PROMOTE SPECIES DIVERSITY IN ARCTIC TUSSOCK TUNDRA? R McKane L Johnson G Shaver K Nadelhoffer E Rastetter B Fry A Giblin K Kielland B Kwiatkowski J Laundre G Murray P Beedlow 2005-06-06T16:42:01Z http://oaspub.epa.gov/eims/eimsapi.dispdetail?deid=61966 unknown NATIONAL HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS RESEARCH LABORATORY Text 2005 ftepa 2007-11-21T14:02:20Z We used 15N soil-labeling techniques to examine how the dominant species in a N-limited, tussock tundra plant community partitioned soil N, and how such partitioning may contribute to community organization. The five most productive species were well differentiated with respect to the chemical form (ammonium, nitrate and glycine), season (June and August), and depth (3 and 8 cm) of N uptake. Species dominance (productivity) was positively correlated with the similarity between the uptake and availability of native forms of N, suggesting that competition and resource partitioning have strongly influenced the organization of this community. We are further investigating this hypothesis by examining the degree of spatial overlap among species that are similar or dissimilar in their use of N. Uptake of 15N injected at different distances from individual plants showed significant interspecific differences in lateral rooting areas and a high potential for overlap of rooting areas among species. We illustrate how the "total" overlap among species can be calculated from the lateral overlap of rooting areas and the degree of ecological overlap measured by 15N partitioning, and how this new measure of overlap can be used to test whether resource competition has contributed to the spatial organization of this community. Text Arctic Tundra Environmental Protection Agency (EPA): Science Inventory Arctic
institution Open Polar
collection Environmental Protection Agency (EPA): Science Inventory
op_collection_id ftepa
language unknown
description We used 15N soil-labeling techniques to examine how the dominant species in a N-limited, tussock tundra plant community partitioned soil N, and how such partitioning may contribute to community organization. The five most productive species were well differentiated with respect to the chemical form (ammonium, nitrate and glycine), season (June and August), and depth (3 and 8 cm) of N uptake. Species dominance (productivity) was positively correlated with the similarity between the uptake and availability of native forms of N, suggesting that competition and resource partitioning have strongly influenced the organization of this community. We are further investigating this hypothesis by examining the degree of spatial overlap among species that are similar or dissimilar in their use of N. Uptake of 15N injected at different distances from individual plants showed significant interspecific differences in lateral rooting areas and a high potential for overlap of rooting areas among species. We illustrate how the "total" overlap among species can be calculated from the lateral overlap of rooting areas and the degree of ecological overlap measured by 15N partitioning, and how this new measure of overlap can be used to test whether resource competition has contributed to the spatial organization of this community.
format Text
author R McKane
L Johnson
G Shaver
K Nadelhoffer
E Rastetter
B Fry
A Giblin
K Kielland
B Kwiatkowski
J Laundre
G Murray
P Beedlow
spellingShingle R McKane
L Johnson
G Shaver
K Nadelhoffer
E Rastetter
B Fry
A Giblin
K Kielland
B Kwiatkowski
J Laundre
G Murray
P Beedlow
DOES NITROGEN PARTITIONING PROMOTE SPECIES DIVERSITY IN ARCTIC TUSSOCK TUNDRA?
author_facet R McKane
L Johnson
G Shaver
K Nadelhoffer
E Rastetter
B Fry
A Giblin
K Kielland
B Kwiatkowski
J Laundre
G Murray
P Beedlow
author_sort R McKane
title DOES NITROGEN PARTITIONING PROMOTE SPECIES DIVERSITY IN ARCTIC TUSSOCK TUNDRA?
title_short DOES NITROGEN PARTITIONING PROMOTE SPECIES DIVERSITY IN ARCTIC TUSSOCK TUNDRA?
title_full DOES NITROGEN PARTITIONING PROMOTE SPECIES DIVERSITY IN ARCTIC TUSSOCK TUNDRA?
title_fullStr DOES NITROGEN PARTITIONING PROMOTE SPECIES DIVERSITY IN ARCTIC TUSSOCK TUNDRA?
title_full_unstemmed DOES NITROGEN PARTITIONING PROMOTE SPECIES DIVERSITY IN ARCTIC TUSSOCK TUNDRA?
title_sort does nitrogen partitioning promote species diversity in arctic tussock tundra?
publishDate 2005
url http://oaspub.epa.gov/eims/eimsapi.dispdetail?deid=61966
geographic Arctic
geographic_facet Arctic
genre Arctic
Tundra
genre_facet Arctic
Tundra
op_source NATIONAL HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS RESEARCH LABORATORY
_version_ 1766337897565257728