Optimising the application of multiple-capture traps for invasive species management using spatial simulation

Internationally, invasive vertebrate species pose a significant threat to biodiversity, agricultural production and human health. To manage these species a wide range of tools, including traps, are used. In New Zealand, brushtail possums (Trichosurus vulpecula), stoats (Mustela ermine), and ship rat...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:PLOS ONE
Main Authors: Warburton, Bruce, Gormley, Andrew M
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2015
Subjects:
Online Access:https://scholia.toolforge.org/work/Q35185292
http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q35185292
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4362759
https://doi.org/10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0120373
id ftenkore:wikidata-Q35185292
record_format openpolar
spelling ftenkore:wikidata-Q35185292 2023-10-09T21:55:34+02:00 Optimising the application of multiple-capture traps for invasive species management using spatial simulation Warburton, Bruce Gormley, Andrew M 2015-03-17 https://scholia.toolforge.org/work/Q35185292 http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q35185292 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4362759 https://doi.org/10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0120373 en eng Public Library of Science (PLoS) https://scholia.toolforge.org/work/Q35185292 http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q35185292 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4362759 doi:10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0120373 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ theme:invasion management theme:wikidata.org/entity/Q113019190 invasion biology invasive species invasive species management invasion management journal article 2015 ftenkore https://doi.org/10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0120373 2023-09-22T09:36:30Z Internationally, invasive vertebrate species pose a significant threat to biodiversity, agricultural production and human health. To manage these species a wide range of tools, including traps, are used. In New Zealand, brushtail possums (Trichosurus vulpecula), stoats (Mustela ermine), and ship rats (Rattus rattus) are invasive and there is an ongoing demand for cost-effective non-toxic methods for controlling these pests. Recently, traps with multiple-capture capability have been developed which, because they do not require regular operator-checking, are purported to be more cost-effective than traditional single-capture traps. However, when pest populations are being maintained at low densities (as is typical of orchestrated pest management programmes) it remains uncertain if it is more cost-effective to use fewer multiple-capture traps or more single-capture traps. To address this uncertainty, we used an individual-based spatially explicit modelling approach to determine the likely maximum animal-captures per trap, given stated pest densities and defined times traps are left between checks. In the simulation, single- or multiple-capture traps were spaced according to best practice pest-control guidelines. For possums with maintenance densities set at the lowest level (i.e. 0.5/ha), 98% of all simulated possums were captured with only a single capacity trap set at each site. When possum density was increased to moderate levels of 3/ha, having a capacity of three captures per trap caught 97% of all simulated possums. Results were similar for stoats, although only two potential captures per site were sufficient to capture 99% of simulated stoats. For rats, which were simulated at their typically higher densities, even a six-capture capacity per trap site only resulted in 80% kill. Depending on target species, prevailing density and extent of immigration, the most cost-effective strategy for pest control in New Zealand might be to deploy several single-capture traps rather than investing in fewer, but more ... Article in Journal/Newspaper Rattus rattus enKORE project New Zealand PLOS ONE 10 3 e0120373
institution Open Polar
collection enKORE project
op_collection_id ftenkore
language English
topic theme:invasion management
theme:wikidata.org/entity/Q113019190
invasion biology
invasive species
invasive species management
invasion management
spellingShingle theme:invasion management
theme:wikidata.org/entity/Q113019190
invasion biology
invasive species
invasive species management
invasion management
Warburton, Bruce
Gormley, Andrew M
Optimising the application of multiple-capture traps for invasive species management using spatial simulation
topic_facet theme:invasion management
theme:wikidata.org/entity/Q113019190
invasion biology
invasive species
invasive species management
invasion management
description Internationally, invasive vertebrate species pose a significant threat to biodiversity, agricultural production and human health. To manage these species a wide range of tools, including traps, are used. In New Zealand, brushtail possums (Trichosurus vulpecula), stoats (Mustela ermine), and ship rats (Rattus rattus) are invasive and there is an ongoing demand for cost-effective non-toxic methods for controlling these pests. Recently, traps with multiple-capture capability have been developed which, because they do not require regular operator-checking, are purported to be more cost-effective than traditional single-capture traps. However, when pest populations are being maintained at low densities (as is typical of orchestrated pest management programmes) it remains uncertain if it is more cost-effective to use fewer multiple-capture traps or more single-capture traps. To address this uncertainty, we used an individual-based spatially explicit modelling approach to determine the likely maximum animal-captures per trap, given stated pest densities and defined times traps are left between checks. In the simulation, single- or multiple-capture traps were spaced according to best practice pest-control guidelines. For possums with maintenance densities set at the lowest level (i.e. 0.5/ha), 98% of all simulated possums were captured with only a single capacity trap set at each site. When possum density was increased to moderate levels of 3/ha, having a capacity of three captures per trap caught 97% of all simulated possums. Results were similar for stoats, although only two potential captures per site were sufficient to capture 99% of simulated stoats. For rats, which were simulated at their typically higher densities, even a six-capture capacity per trap site only resulted in 80% kill. Depending on target species, prevailing density and extent of immigration, the most cost-effective strategy for pest control in New Zealand might be to deploy several single-capture traps rather than investing in fewer, but more ...
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Warburton, Bruce
Gormley, Andrew M
author_facet Warburton, Bruce
Gormley, Andrew M
author_sort Warburton, Bruce
title Optimising the application of multiple-capture traps for invasive species management using spatial simulation
title_short Optimising the application of multiple-capture traps for invasive species management using spatial simulation
title_full Optimising the application of multiple-capture traps for invasive species management using spatial simulation
title_fullStr Optimising the application of multiple-capture traps for invasive species management using spatial simulation
title_full_unstemmed Optimising the application of multiple-capture traps for invasive species management using spatial simulation
title_sort optimising the application of multiple-capture traps for invasive species management using spatial simulation
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
publishDate 2015
url https://scholia.toolforge.org/work/Q35185292
http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q35185292
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4362759
https://doi.org/10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0120373
geographic New Zealand
geographic_facet New Zealand
genre Rattus rattus
genre_facet Rattus rattus
op_relation https://scholia.toolforge.org/work/Q35185292
http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q35185292
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4362759
doi:10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0120373
op_rights http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0120373
container_title PLOS ONE
container_volume 10
container_issue 3
container_start_page e0120373
_version_ 1779319525026562048