Differentiating Microtus Xanthognathus and Microtus Pennsylvanicus Lower First Molars Using Discriminant Analysis of Landmark Data

The distinct ecological requirements of Microtus xanthognathus (yellow-cheeked vole or taiga vole) and M. pennsylvanicus (meadow vole) warrant accurate discrimination of their remains in studies of paleoecology and past biogeographical shifts. An occlusal length of the lower 1st molars (ml) that is...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of Mammalogy
Main Author: Wallace, Steven
Format: Text
Language:unknown
Published: Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University 2006
Subjects:
Online Access:https://dc.etsu.edu/etsu-works/18101
https://doi.org/10.1644/05-MAMM-A-209R3.1
id fteasttennesseeu:oai:dc.etsu.edu:etsu-works-19367
record_format openpolar
spelling fteasttennesseeu:oai:dc.etsu.edu:etsu-works-19367 2023-07-30T04:07:12+02:00 Differentiating Microtus Xanthognathus and Microtus Pennsylvanicus Lower First Molars Using Discriminant Analysis of Landmark Data Wallace, Steven 2006-12-01T08:00:00Z https://dc.etsu.edu/etsu-works/18101 https://doi.org/10.1644/05-MAMM-A-209R3.1 unknown Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University https://dc.etsu.edu/etsu-works/18101 doi:10.1644/05-MAMM-A-209R3.1 https://doi.org/10.1644/05-MAMM-A-209R3.1 ETSU Faculty Works discriminant function landmark data meadow vole microtus pennsylvanicus microtus xanthognathus morphometrics yellow-cheeked vole Geosciences text 2006 fteasttennesseeu https://doi.org/10.1644/05-MAMM-A-209R3.1 2023-07-15T18:46:14Z The distinct ecological requirements of Microtus xanthognathus (yellow-cheeked vole or taiga vole) and M. pennsylvanicus (meadow vole) warrant accurate discrimination of their remains in studies of paleoecology and past biogeographical shifts. An occlusal length of the lower 1st molars (ml) that is >3.2 mm for M. xanthognathus is the method most frequently used to separate these 2 taxa in archaeological and paleontological samples. However, these measurements alone are unreliable because some specimens of M. pennsylvanicus overlap smaller individuals of M. xanthognathus in size. Therefore, I created and tested a morphometric technique that discriminates Recent lower 1st molars (mis) of M. pennsylvanicus from those of M. xanthognathus, and is applicable to other taxa (both modern and fossil). Despite overlapping occlusal length, my discriminant function based on landmark data correctly classified 100% (n = 53) of Recent m1s from the 2 taxa and 97.7% (43 of 44) of (assumed) m1s of M. pennsylvanicus from an archaeological site from about AD 1200 in central Nebraska. This landmark scheme is applicable to fossil and modern Microtus worldwide. © 2006 American Society of Mammalogists. Text taiga Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University Journal of Mammalogy 87 6 1261 1269
institution Open Polar
collection Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University
op_collection_id fteasttennesseeu
language unknown
topic discriminant function
landmark data
meadow vole
microtus pennsylvanicus
microtus xanthognathus
morphometrics
yellow-cheeked vole
Geosciences
spellingShingle discriminant function
landmark data
meadow vole
microtus pennsylvanicus
microtus xanthognathus
morphometrics
yellow-cheeked vole
Geosciences
Wallace, Steven
Differentiating Microtus Xanthognathus and Microtus Pennsylvanicus Lower First Molars Using Discriminant Analysis of Landmark Data
topic_facet discriminant function
landmark data
meadow vole
microtus pennsylvanicus
microtus xanthognathus
morphometrics
yellow-cheeked vole
Geosciences
description The distinct ecological requirements of Microtus xanthognathus (yellow-cheeked vole or taiga vole) and M. pennsylvanicus (meadow vole) warrant accurate discrimination of their remains in studies of paleoecology and past biogeographical shifts. An occlusal length of the lower 1st molars (ml) that is >3.2 mm for M. xanthognathus is the method most frequently used to separate these 2 taxa in archaeological and paleontological samples. However, these measurements alone are unreliable because some specimens of M. pennsylvanicus overlap smaller individuals of M. xanthognathus in size. Therefore, I created and tested a morphometric technique that discriminates Recent lower 1st molars (mis) of M. pennsylvanicus from those of M. xanthognathus, and is applicable to other taxa (both modern and fossil). Despite overlapping occlusal length, my discriminant function based on landmark data correctly classified 100% (n = 53) of Recent m1s from the 2 taxa and 97.7% (43 of 44) of (assumed) m1s of M. pennsylvanicus from an archaeological site from about AD 1200 in central Nebraska. This landmark scheme is applicable to fossil and modern Microtus worldwide. © 2006 American Society of Mammalogists.
format Text
author Wallace, Steven
author_facet Wallace, Steven
author_sort Wallace, Steven
title Differentiating Microtus Xanthognathus and Microtus Pennsylvanicus Lower First Molars Using Discriminant Analysis of Landmark Data
title_short Differentiating Microtus Xanthognathus and Microtus Pennsylvanicus Lower First Molars Using Discriminant Analysis of Landmark Data
title_full Differentiating Microtus Xanthognathus and Microtus Pennsylvanicus Lower First Molars Using Discriminant Analysis of Landmark Data
title_fullStr Differentiating Microtus Xanthognathus and Microtus Pennsylvanicus Lower First Molars Using Discriminant Analysis of Landmark Data
title_full_unstemmed Differentiating Microtus Xanthognathus and Microtus Pennsylvanicus Lower First Molars Using Discriminant Analysis of Landmark Data
title_sort differentiating microtus xanthognathus and microtus pennsylvanicus lower first molars using discriminant analysis of landmark data
publisher Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University
publishDate 2006
url https://dc.etsu.edu/etsu-works/18101
https://doi.org/10.1644/05-MAMM-A-209R3.1
genre taiga
genre_facet taiga
op_source ETSU Faculty Works
op_relation https://dc.etsu.edu/etsu-works/18101
doi:10.1644/05-MAMM-A-209R3.1
https://doi.org/10.1644/05-MAMM-A-209R3.1
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1644/05-MAMM-A-209R3.1
container_title Journal of Mammalogy
container_volume 87
container_issue 6
container_start_page 1261
op_container_end_page 1269
_version_ 1772820387386621952