Pride and Perseverance: Strategic Use of Rebus Sic Stantibus in Russian Foreign Policy 1870 – 1950
The paper examines the use of rebus sic stantibus, a claim that a fundamental change of circumstances warrants withdrawal or termination of a treaty, by Russia in three key episodes in Russian foreign policy. These episodes have not been examined together by scholars and have not all been analysed f...
Published in: | German Yearbook of International Law |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Text |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Berlin: Duncker & Humblot
2020
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.3790/gyil.63.1.581 |
id |
ftdunckerhumblot:https://www.doi.org/10.3790/gyil.63.1.581 |
---|---|
record_format |
openpolar |
spelling |
ftdunckerhumblot:https://www.doi.org/10.3790/gyil.63.1.581 2024-01-07T09:46:57+01:00 Pride and Perseverance: Strategic Use of Rebus Sic Stantibus in Russian Foreign Policy 1870 – 1950 Leonhardsen, Erlend M. 2020-01-01 pdf https://doi.org/10.3790/gyil.63.1.581 en eng Berlin: Duncker & Humblot https://www.doi.org/10.3790/gyil.63.1.581 Paid access German Yearbook of International Law, Vol. 63, Iss. 1: Pride and Perseverance: Strategic Use of Rebus Sic Stantibus in Russian Foreign Policy 1870 – 1950 L text 2020 ftdunckerhumblot https://doi.org/10.3790/gyil.63.1.581 2023-12-10T23:35:09Z The paper examines the use of rebus sic stantibus, a claim that a fundamental change of circumstances warrants withdrawal or termination of a treaty, by Russia in three key episodes in Russian foreign policy. These episodes have not been examined together by scholars and have not all been analysed from the perspective of rebus sic stantibus. First, it examines the situation in 1870 when Russia used this approach to obtain the London Declaration, which revised unfavourable terms in the 1856 Treaty of Paris following the Crimean War. Second, it examines the Soviet attempt to terminate or renegotiate the Montreux Convention during and in the aftermath of the Second World War through the use of rebus sic stantibus and, third, it examines the Soviet attempt to renegotiate the Svalbard Treaty through the use of this legal approach. Notably, the analysis shows that these attempts took place during shifts in Russia’s relative power. Given the design of the treaties in question, rebus sic stantibus was one of the only ways to achieve these goals. In addition to providing a thorough study of episodes unexamined from an international legal perspective, the paper may therefore shed light on when rebus sic stantibus is useful and why it is relied on less and less by states today. Text Svalbard Duncker & Humblot eLibrary Svalbard Perseverance ENVELOPE(162.200,162.200,-76.800,-76.800) German Yearbook of International Law 63 1 581 620 |
institution |
Open Polar |
collection |
Duncker & Humblot eLibrary |
op_collection_id |
ftdunckerhumblot |
language |
English |
topic |
L |
spellingShingle |
L Leonhardsen, Erlend M. Pride and Perseverance: Strategic Use of Rebus Sic Stantibus in Russian Foreign Policy 1870 – 1950 |
topic_facet |
L |
description |
The paper examines the use of rebus sic stantibus, a claim that a fundamental change of circumstances warrants withdrawal or termination of a treaty, by Russia in three key episodes in Russian foreign policy. These episodes have not been examined together by scholars and have not all been analysed from the perspective of rebus sic stantibus. First, it examines the situation in 1870 when Russia used this approach to obtain the London Declaration, which revised unfavourable terms in the 1856 Treaty of Paris following the Crimean War. Second, it examines the Soviet attempt to terminate or renegotiate the Montreux Convention during and in the aftermath of the Second World War through the use of rebus sic stantibus and, third, it examines the Soviet attempt to renegotiate the Svalbard Treaty through the use of this legal approach. Notably, the analysis shows that these attempts took place during shifts in Russia’s relative power. Given the design of the treaties in question, rebus sic stantibus was one of the only ways to achieve these goals. In addition to providing a thorough study of episodes unexamined from an international legal perspective, the paper may therefore shed light on when rebus sic stantibus is useful and why it is relied on less and less by states today. |
format |
Text |
author |
Leonhardsen, Erlend M. |
author_facet |
Leonhardsen, Erlend M. |
author_sort |
Leonhardsen, Erlend M. |
title |
Pride and Perseverance: Strategic Use of Rebus Sic Stantibus in Russian Foreign Policy 1870 – 1950 |
title_short |
Pride and Perseverance: Strategic Use of Rebus Sic Stantibus in Russian Foreign Policy 1870 – 1950 |
title_full |
Pride and Perseverance: Strategic Use of Rebus Sic Stantibus in Russian Foreign Policy 1870 – 1950 |
title_fullStr |
Pride and Perseverance: Strategic Use of Rebus Sic Stantibus in Russian Foreign Policy 1870 – 1950 |
title_full_unstemmed |
Pride and Perseverance: Strategic Use of Rebus Sic Stantibus in Russian Foreign Policy 1870 – 1950 |
title_sort |
pride and perseverance: strategic use of rebus sic stantibus in russian foreign policy 1870 – 1950 |
publisher |
Berlin: Duncker & Humblot |
publishDate |
2020 |
url |
https://doi.org/10.3790/gyil.63.1.581 |
long_lat |
ENVELOPE(162.200,162.200,-76.800,-76.800) |
geographic |
Svalbard Perseverance |
geographic_facet |
Svalbard Perseverance |
genre |
Svalbard |
genre_facet |
Svalbard |
op_source |
German Yearbook of International Law, Vol. 63, Iss. 1: Pride and Perseverance: Strategic Use of Rebus Sic Stantibus in Russian Foreign Policy 1870 – 1950 |
op_relation |
https://www.doi.org/10.3790/gyil.63.1.581 |
op_rights |
Paid access |
op_doi |
https://doi.org/10.3790/gyil.63.1.581 |
container_title |
German Yearbook of International Law |
container_volume |
63 |
container_issue |
1 |
container_start_page |
581 |
op_container_end_page |
620 |
_version_ |
1787428878067695616 |