Pride and Perseverance: Strategic Use of Rebus Sic Stantibus in Russian Foreign Policy 1870 – 1950

The paper examines the use of rebus sic stantibus, a claim that a fundamental change of circumstances warrants withdrawal or termination of a treaty, by Russia in three key episodes in Russian foreign policy. These episodes have not been examined together by scholars and have not all been analysed f...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:German Yearbook of International Law
Main Author: Leonhardsen, Erlend M.
Format: Text
Language:English
Published: Berlin: Duncker & Humblot 2020
Subjects:
L
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.3790/gyil.63.1.581
id ftdunckerhumblot:https://www.doi.org/10.3790/gyil.63.1.581
record_format openpolar
spelling ftdunckerhumblot:https://www.doi.org/10.3790/gyil.63.1.581 2024-01-07T09:46:57+01:00 Pride and Perseverance: Strategic Use of Rebus Sic Stantibus in Russian Foreign Policy 1870 – 1950 Leonhardsen, Erlend M. 2020-01-01 pdf https://doi.org/10.3790/gyil.63.1.581 en eng Berlin: Duncker & Humblot https://www.doi.org/10.3790/gyil.63.1.581 Paid access German Yearbook of International Law, Vol. 63, Iss. 1: Pride and Perseverance: Strategic Use of Rebus Sic Stantibus in Russian Foreign Policy 1870 – 1950 L text 2020 ftdunckerhumblot https://doi.org/10.3790/gyil.63.1.581 2023-12-10T23:35:09Z The paper examines the use of rebus sic stantibus, a claim that a fundamental change of circumstances warrants withdrawal or termination of a treaty, by Russia in three key episodes in Russian foreign policy. These episodes have not been examined together by scholars and have not all been analysed from the perspective of rebus sic stantibus. First, it examines the situation in 1870 when Russia used this approach to obtain the London Declaration, which revised unfavourable terms in the 1856 Treaty of Paris following the Crimean War. Second, it examines the Soviet attempt to terminate or renegotiate the Montreux Convention during and in the aftermath of the Second World War through the use of rebus sic stantibus and, third, it examines the Soviet attempt to renegotiate the Svalbard Treaty through the use of this legal approach. Notably, the analysis shows that these attempts took place during shifts in Russia’s relative power. Given the design of the treaties in question, rebus sic stantibus was one of the only ways to achieve these goals. In addition to providing a thorough study of episodes unexamined from an international legal perspective, the paper may therefore shed light on when rebus sic stantibus is useful and why it is relied on less and less by states today. Text Svalbard Duncker & Humblot eLibrary Svalbard Perseverance ENVELOPE(162.200,162.200,-76.800,-76.800) German Yearbook of International Law 63 1 581 620
institution Open Polar
collection Duncker & Humblot eLibrary
op_collection_id ftdunckerhumblot
language English
topic L
spellingShingle L
Leonhardsen, Erlend M.
Pride and Perseverance: Strategic Use of Rebus Sic Stantibus in Russian Foreign Policy 1870 – 1950
topic_facet L
description The paper examines the use of rebus sic stantibus, a claim that a fundamental change of circumstances warrants withdrawal or termination of a treaty, by Russia in three key episodes in Russian foreign policy. These episodes have not been examined together by scholars and have not all been analysed from the perspective of rebus sic stantibus. First, it examines the situation in 1870 when Russia used this approach to obtain the London Declaration, which revised unfavourable terms in the 1856 Treaty of Paris following the Crimean War. Second, it examines the Soviet attempt to terminate or renegotiate the Montreux Convention during and in the aftermath of the Second World War through the use of rebus sic stantibus and, third, it examines the Soviet attempt to renegotiate the Svalbard Treaty through the use of this legal approach. Notably, the analysis shows that these attempts took place during shifts in Russia’s relative power. Given the design of the treaties in question, rebus sic stantibus was one of the only ways to achieve these goals. In addition to providing a thorough study of episodes unexamined from an international legal perspective, the paper may therefore shed light on when rebus sic stantibus is useful and why it is relied on less and less by states today.
format Text
author Leonhardsen, Erlend M.
author_facet Leonhardsen, Erlend M.
author_sort Leonhardsen, Erlend M.
title Pride and Perseverance: Strategic Use of Rebus Sic Stantibus in Russian Foreign Policy 1870 – 1950
title_short Pride and Perseverance: Strategic Use of Rebus Sic Stantibus in Russian Foreign Policy 1870 – 1950
title_full Pride and Perseverance: Strategic Use of Rebus Sic Stantibus in Russian Foreign Policy 1870 – 1950
title_fullStr Pride and Perseverance: Strategic Use of Rebus Sic Stantibus in Russian Foreign Policy 1870 – 1950
title_full_unstemmed Pride and Perseverance: Strategic Use of Rebus Sic Stantibus in Russian Foreign Policy 1870 – 1950
title_sort pride and perseverance: strategic use of rebus sic stantibus in russian foreign policy 1870 – 1950
publisher Berlin: Duncker & Humblot
publishDate 2020
url https://doi.org/10.3790/gyil.63.1.581
long_lat ENVELOPE(162.200,162.200,-76.800,-76.800)
geographic Svalbard
Perseverance
geographic_facet Svalbard
Perseverance
genre Svalbard
genre_facet Svalbard
op_source German Yearbook of International Law, Vol. 63, Iss. 1: Pride and Perseverance: Strategic Use of Rebus Sic Stantibus in Russian Foreign Policy 1870 – 1950
op_relation https://www.doi.org/10.3790/gyil.63.1.581
op_rights Paid access
op_doi https://doi.org/10.3790/gyil.63.1.581
container_title German Yearbook of International Law
container_volume 63
container_issue 1
container_start_page 581
op_container_end_page 620
_version_ 1787428878067695616