In the Dark: State v. Alaska Legislative Council and Public-School Funding in the Face of the Dedicated Funds Clause

In the past several years, Alaska has faced many challenges in its public education system. These challenges gave rise to an intense political debate, significant new legislation, and a protracted battle over the future of funding for public education. Governor Mike Dunleavy and the state legislatur...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Perry, Joe
Format: Text
Language:unknown
Published: Duke University School of Law 2024
Subjects:
Law
Online Access:https://scholarship.law.duke.edu/alr/vol40/iss2/3
https://scholarship.law.duke.edu/context/alr/article/1648/viewcontent/note2.pdf
id ftdukeunivlaw:oai:scholarship.law.duke.edu:alr-1648
record_format openpolar
spelling ftdukeunivlaw:oai:scholarship.law.duke.edu:alr-1648 2024-04-21T07:43:55+00:00 In the Dark: State v. Alaska Legislative Council and Public-School Funding in the Face of the Dedicated Funds Clause Perry, Joe 2024-03-22T07:00:00Z application/pdf https://scholarship.law.duke.edu/alr/vol40/iss2/3 https://scholarship.law.duke.edu/context/alr/article/1648/viewcontent/note2.pdf unknown Duke University School of Law https://scholarship.law.duke.edu/alr/vol40/iss2/3 https://scholarship.law.duke.edu/context/alr/article/1648/viewcontent/note2.pdf Alaska Law Review Law text 2024 ftdukeunivlaw 2024-03-27T15:25:49Z In the past several years, Alaska has faced many challenges in its public education system. These challenges gave rise to an intense political debate, significant new legislation, and a protracted battle over the future of funding for public education. Governor Mike Dunleavy and the state legislature publicly clashed over the implementation of H.B. 287, a 2018 state law designed to provide financial stability to ailing schools and curtail teacher layoffs. In 2022, the Supreme Court of Alaska resolved the dispute in favor of the governor and found a contentious piece of state legislation unconstitutional under the states "Dedicated Funds Clause." This Note examines the Court's decision in State v. Alaska Legislative Council, considers the underlying constitutional issues in the case, and explores the implications of the ruling. In particular, this Note argues that the Court incorrectly decided the case on multiple grounds—misinterpreting the plain text of the relevant constitutional provisions, the framers' intent, and the court's own precedent in a decision that will exacerbate existing troubles with public education in the state. The proper interpretation of the Dedicated Funds Clause matters for legislators, government agencies, teachers, parents, and children in Alaska going forward. Text Alaska law review Alaska Duke Law School Scholarship Repository
institution Open Polar
collection Duke Law School Scholarship Repository
op_collection_id ftdukeunivlaw
language unknown
topic Law
spellingShingle Law
Perry, Joe
In the Dark: State v. Alaska Legislative Council and Public-School Funding in the Face of the Dedicated Funds Clause
topic_facet Law
description In the past several years, Alaska has faced many challenges in its public education system. These challenges gave rise to an intense political debate, significant new legislation, and a protracted battle over the future of funding for public education. Governor Mike Dunleavy and the state legislature publicly clashed over the implementation of H.B. 287, a 2018 state law designed to provide financial stability to ailing schools and curtail teacher layoffs. In 2022, the Supreme Court of Alaska resolved the dispute in favor of the governor and found a contentious piece of state legislation unconstitutional under the states "Dedicated Funds Clause." This Note examines the Court's decision in State v. Alaska Legislative Council, considers the underlying constitutional issues in the case, and explores the implications of the ruling. In particular, this Note argues that the Court incorrectly decided the case on multiple grounds—misinterpreting the plain text of the relevant constitutional provisions, the framers' intent, and the court's own precedent in a decision that will exacerbate existing troubles with public education in the state. The proper interpretation of the Dedicated Funds Clause matters for legislators, government agencies, teachers, parents, and children in Alaska going forward.
format Text
author Perry, Joe
author_facet Perry, Joe
author_sort Perry, Joe
title In the Dark: State v. Alaska Legislative Council and Public-School Funding in the Face of the Dedicated Funds Clause
title_short In the Dark: State v. Alaska Legislative Council and Public-School Funding in the Face of the Dedicated Funds Clause
title_full In the Dark: State v. Alaska Legislative Council and Public-School Funding in the Face of the Dedicated Funds Clause
title_fullStr In the Dark: State v. Alaska Legislative Council and Public-School Funding in the Face of the Dedicated Funds Clause
title_full_unstemmed In the Dark: State v. Alaska Legislative Council and Public-School Funding in the Face of the Dedicated Funds Clause
title_sort in the dark: state v. alaska legislative council and public-school funding in the face of the dedicated funds clause
publisher Duke University School of Law
publishDate 2024
url https://scholarship.law.duke.edu/alr/vol40/iss2/3
https://scholarship.law.duke.edu/context/alr/article/1648/viewcontent/note2.pdf
genre Alaska law review
Alaska
genre_facet Alaska law review
Alaska
op_source Alaska Law Review
op_relation https://scholarship.law.duke.edu/alr/vol40/iss2/3
https://scholarship.law.duke.edu/context/alr/article/1648/viewcontent/note2.pdf
_version_ 1796933982584045568