Placing Children with Relatives: The Case for a Clear Rationale for Separate Foster Care Licensing Standards, Background Check Procedures, and Improved Relative Placement Statutes in Alaska

Policymakers generally agree that if a child cannot live safely with her parents, then the child should be placed expeditiously with a relative. Alaska’s current system for evaluating relative caregivers is overly complicated, creating unnecessary barriers for relatives and increasing the risk of mi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Lewis, Courtney
Format: Text
Language:unknown
Published: Duke University School of Law 2017
Subjects:
Law
Online Access:https://scholarship.law.duke.edu/alr/vol34/iss2/3
https://scholarship.law.duke.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1532&context=alr
id ftdukeunivlaw:oai:scholarship.law.duke.edu:alr-1532
record_format openpolar
spelling ftdukeunivlaw:oai:scholarship.law.duke.edu:alr-1532 2023-05-15T13:08:49+02:00 Placing Children with Relatives: The Case for a Clear Rationale for Separate Foster Care Licensing Standards, Background Check Procedures, and Improved Relative Placement Statutes in Alaska Lewis, Courtney 2017-11-30T08:00:00Z application/pdf https://scholarship.law.duke.edu/alr/vol34/iss2/3 https://scholarship.law.duke.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1532&context=alr unknown Duke University School of Law https://scholarship.law.duke.edu/alr/vol34/iss2/3 https://scholarship.law.duke.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1532&context=alr Alaska Law Review Law text 2017 ftdukeunivlaw 2023-01-23T21:18:35Z Policymakers generally agree that if a child cannot live safely with her parents, then the child should be placed expeditiously with a relative. Alaska’s current system for evaluating relative caregivers is overly complicated, creating unnecessary barriers for relatives and increasing the risk of mistakenly denying placement with relatives. This Article argues that Alaska should adopt a three-step approach to achieve better outcomes based on the American Bar Association’s model licensing standards, which are narrowly tailored to evaluate whether a child should be placed with a relative. Additionally, this Article argues that Alaska should repeal its state statute that gives the child welfare agency the ability to establish prima facie evidence to deny a relative if a relative would not be eligible for a foster care license, for two reasons. First, a review of the history of the state’s statutes indicates that the legislature did not intend to provide the Department of Health and Human Services with the current definition of prima facie evidence. Second, Alaska’s current statute is not compliant with the 2016 federal regulations regarding the Indian Child Welfare Act. Lastly, this Article argues that Alaska should adopt a statute clearly delineating the court’s authority to order placement of a child facing foster care with a relative to expedite compliance with relative placement in frontline child welfare practice. Adopting these proposals would reduce barriers and the number of mistakes in frontline child welfare practice, which would increase both the timeliness and the number of children placed with relatives. Text Alaska law review Alaska Duke Law School Scholarship Repository Indian
institution Open Polar
collection Duke Law School Scholarship Repository
op_collection_id ftdukeunivlaw
language unknown
topic Law
spellingShingle Law
Lewis, Courtney
Placing Children with Relatives: The Case for a Clear Rationale for Separate Foster Care Licensing Standards, Background Check Procedures, and Improved Relative Placement Statutes in Alaska
topic_facet Law
description Policymakers generally agree that if a child cannot live safely with her parents, then the child should be placed expeditiously with a relative. Alaska’s current system for evaluating relative caregivers is overly complicated, creating unnecessary barriers for relatives and increasing the risk of mistakenly denying placement with relatives. This Article argues that Alaska should adopt a three-step approach to achieve better outcomes based on the American Bar Association’s model licensing standards, which are narrowly tailored to evaluate whether a child should be placed with a relative. Additionally, this Article argues that Alaska should repeal its state statute that gives the child welfare agency the ability to establish prima facie evidence to deny a relative if a relative would not be eligible for a foster care license, for two reasons. First, a review of the history of the state’s statutes indicates that the legislature did not intend to provide the Department of Health and Human Services with the current definition of prima facie evidence. Second, Alaska’s current statute is not compliant with the 2016 federal regulations regarding the Indian Child Welfare Act. Lastly, this Article argues that Alaska should adopt a statute clearly delineating the court’s authority to order placement of a child facing foster care with a relative to expedite compliance with relative placement in frontline child welfare practice. Adopting these proposals would reduce barriers and the number of mistakes in frontline child welfare practice, which would increase both the timeliness and the number of children placed with relatives.
format Text
author Lewis, Courtney
author_facet Lewis, Courtney
author_sort Lewis, Courtney
title Placing Children with Relatives: The Case for a Clear Rationale for Separate Foster Care Licensing Standards, Background Check Procedures, and Improved Relative Placement Statutes in Alaska
title_short Placing Children with Relatives: The Case for a Clear Rationale for Separate Foster Care Licensing Standards, Background Check Procedures, and Improved Relative Placement Statutes in Alaska
title_full Placing Children with Relatives: The Case for a Clear Rationale for Separate Foster Care Licensing Standards, Background Check Procedures, and Improved Relative Placement Statutes in Alaska
title_fullStr Placing Children with Relatives: The Case for a Clear Rationale for Separate Foster Care Licensing Standards, Background Check Procedures, and Improved Relative Placement Statutes in Alaska
title_full_unstemmed Placing Children with Relatives: The Case for a Clear Rationale for Separate Foster Care Licensing Standards, Background Check Procedures, and Improved Relative Placement Statutes in Alaska
title_sort placing children with relatives: the case for a clear rationale for separate foster care licensing standards, background check procedures, and improved relative placement statutes in alaska
publisher Duke University School of Law
publishDate 2017
url https://scholarship.law.duke.edu/alr/vol34/iss2/3
https://scholarship.law.duke.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1532&context=alr
geographic Indian
geographic_facet Indian
genre Alaska law review
Alaska
genre_facet Alaska law review
Alaska
op_source Alaska Law Review
op_relation https://scholarship.law.duke.edu/alr/vol34/iss2/3
https://scholarship.law.duke.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1532&context=alr
_version_ 1766128343654072320