"A System Appallingly out of Balance": Morgan v. State and the Rights of Defendants and Victims in Sexual Assault Prosecutions
In a series of three cases that culminate with Morgan v. State, Alaska's courts established a unique protection for defendants in sexual assault cases. This protection, which allows such defendants to attack their victims in court with previous reports of sexual assault that did not result in p...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Text |
Language: | unknown |
Published: |
Duke University School of Law
2015
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://scholarship.law.duke.edu/alr/vol32/iss2/2 https://scholarship.law.duke.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1497&context=alr |
id |
ftdukeunivlaw:oai:scholarship.law.duke.edu:alr-1497 |
---|---|
record_format |
openpolar |
spelling |
ftdukeunivlaw:oai:scholarship.law.duke.edu:alr-1497 2023-05-15T13:08:49+02:00 "A System Appallingly out of Balance": Morgan v. State and the Rights of Defendants and Victims in Sexual Assault Prosecutions Doty, Daniel E. 2015-12-01T08:00:00Z application/pdf https://scholarship.law.duke.edu/alr/vol32/iss2/2 https://scholarship.law.duke.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1497&context=alr unknown Duke University School of Law https://scholarship.law.duke.edu/alr/vol32/iss2/2 https://scholarship.law.duke.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1497&context=alr Alaska Law Review Law text 2015 ftdukeunivlaw 2023-01-23T21:16:59Z In a series of three cases that culminate with Morgan v. State, Alaska's courts established a unique protection for defendants in sexual assault cases. This protection, which allows such defendants to attack their victims in court with previous reports of sexual assault that did not result in prosecution, is not afforded to defendants in other cases and is based on a dubious "general principle" that the credibility of sexual assault victims has "special relevance." The protection is problematic in several ways: it is grounded in erroneous stereotypes about the victims of sex crimes; it is detrimental to victims and the pursuit of truth; it is inconsistent with traditional rules of evidence; and it is unnecessary to protect the rights of defendants. For these reasons, this protection for defendants in sexual assault cases should be abrogated by legislative action as proposed herein. Text Alaska law review Duke Law School Scholarship Repository |
institution |
Open Polar |
collection |
Duke Law School Scholarship Repository |
op_collection_id |
ftdukeunivlaw |
language |
unknown |
topic |
Law |
spellingShingle |
Law Doty, Daniel E. "A System Appallingly out of Balance": Morgan v. State and the Rights of Defendants and Victims in Sexual Assault Prosecutions |
topic_facet |
Law |
description |
In a series of three cases that culminate with Morgan v. State, Alaska's courts established a unique protection for defendants in sexual assault cases. This protection, which allows such defendants to attack their victims in court with previous reports of sexual assault that did not result in prosecution, is not afforded to defendants in other cases and is based on a dubious "general principle" that the credibility of sexual assault victims has "special relevance." The protection is problematic in several ways: it is grounded in erroneous stereotypes about the victims of sex crimes; it is detrimental to victims and the pursuit of truth; it is inconsistent with traditional rules of evidence; and it is unnecessary to protect the rights of defendants. For these reasons, this protection for defendants in sexual assault cases should be abrogated by legislative action as proposed herein. |
format |
Text |
author |
Doty, Daniel E. |
author_facet |
Doty, Daniel E. |
author_sort |
Doty, Daniel E. |
title |
"A System Appallingly out of Balance": Morgan v. State and the Rights of Defendants and Victims in Sexual Assault Prosecutions |
title_short |
"A System Appallingly out of Balance": Morgan v. State and the Rights of Defendants and Victims in Sexual Assault Prosecutions |
title_full |
"A System Appallingly out of Balance": Morgan v. State and the Rights of Defendants and Victims in Sexual Assault Prosecutions |
title_fullStr |
"A System Appallingly out of Balance": Morgan v. State and the Rights of Defendants and Victims in Sexual Assault Prosecutions |
title_full_unstemmed |
"A System Appallingly out of Balance": Morgan v. State and the Rights of Defendants and Victims in Sexual Assault Prosecutions |
title_sort |
"a system appallingly out of balance": morgan v. state and the rights of defendants and victims in sexual assault prosecutions |
publisher |
Duke University School of Law |
publishDate |
2015 |
url |
https://scholarship.law.duke.edu/alr/vol32/iss2/2 https://scholarship.law.duke.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1497&context=alr |
genre |
Alaska law review |
genre_facet |
Alaska law review |
op_source |
Alaska Law Review |
op_relation |
https://scholarship.law.duke.edu/alr/vol32/iss2/2 https://scholarship.law.duke.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1497&context=alr |
_version_ |
1766127617368391680 |