Guilty But Mentally Ill: The Ethical Dilemma Of Mental Illness As A Tool Of The Prosecution
While other jurisdictions use guilty but mentally ill as a compromise verdict to fill the gap between guilty by reason of insanity and a guilty verdict after an unsuccessful insanity defense, Alaska has transformed the status into a prosecutorial tool to keep mentally ill defendants incarcerated for...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Text |
Language: | unknown |
Published: |
Duke University School of Law
2015
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://scholarship.law.duke.edu/alr/vol32/iss1/2 https://scholarship.law.duke.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1489&context=alr |