Mutiny Against the MMPA: A Look at Alaska SB 60

In an attempt to curb the detrimental effects of a ballooning sea otter population, a new bill proposed in the Alaska State Senate seeks to amend the Alaska fish and game statutes by placing a bounty of $100 on sea otters lawfully taken by Alaska Natives. This Note studies the conflicting nature of...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Boyle, Garrett
Format: Text
Language:unknown
Published: Duke University School of Law 2013
Subjects:
Law
Online Access:https://scholarship.law.duke.edu/alr/vol30/iss2/4
https://scholarship.law.duke.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1366&context=alr
id ftdukeunivlaw:oai:scholarship.law.duke.edu:alr-1366
record_format openpolar
spelling ftdukeunivlaw:oai:scholarship.law.duke.edu:alr-1366 2023-05-15T13:08:49+02:00 Mutiny Against the MMPA: A Look at Alaska SB 60 Boyle, Garrett 2013-12-01T08:00:00Z application/pdf https://scholarship.law.duke.edu/alr/vol30/iss2/4 https://scholarship.law.duke.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1366&context=alr unknown Duke University School of Law https://scholarship.law.duke.edu/alr/vol30/iss2/4 https://scholarship.law.duke.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1366&context=alr Alaska Law Review Law text 2013 ftdukeunivlaw 2023-01-23T21:14:48Z In an attempt to curb the detrimental effects of a ballooning sea otter population, a new bill proposed in the Alaska State Senate seeks to amend the Alaska fish and game statutes by placing a bounty of $100 on sea otters lawfully taken by Alaska Natives. This Note studies the conflicting nature of the proposed bill, SB 60, with the current version of the Marine Mammal Protection Act, examining the enforceability of the provision in light of precedent from the Alaska Supreme Court and a liberal interpretation of the MMPA. The Note ultimately concludes that SB 60, as written, is precluded by the MMPA and therefore unenforceable. Text Alaska law review Alaska Duke Law School Scholarship Repository
institution Open Polar
collection Duke Law School Scholarship Repository
op_collection_id ftdukeunivlaw
language unknown
topic Law
spellingShingle Law
Boyle, Garrett
Mutiny Against the MMPA: A Look at Alaska SB 60
topic_facet Law
description In an attempt to curb the detrimental effects of a ballooning sea otter population, a new bill proposed in the Alaska State Senate seeks to amend the Alaska fish and game statutes by placing a bounty of $100 on sea otters lawfully taken by Alaska Natives. This Note studies the conflicting nature of the proposed bill, SB 60, with the current version of the Marine Mammal Protection Act, examining the enforceability of the provision in light of precedent from the Alaska Supreme Court and a liberal interpretation of the MMPA. The Note ultimately concludes that SB 60, as written, is precluded by the MMPA and therefore unenforceable.
format Text
author Boyle, Garrett
author_facet Boyle, Garrett
author_sort Boyle, Garrett
title Mutiny Against the MMPA: A Look at Alaska SB 60
title_short Mutiny Against the MMPA: A Look at Alaska SB 60
title_full Mutiny Against the MMPA: A Look at Alaska SB 60
title_fullStr Mutiny Against the MMPA: A Look at Alaska SB 60
title_full_unstemmed Mutiny Against the MMPA: A Look at Alaska SB 60
title_sort mutiny against the mmpa: a look at alaska sb 60
publisher Duke University School of Law
publishDate 2013
url https://scholarship.law.duke.edu/alr/vol30/iss2/4
https://scholarship.law.duke.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1366&context=alr
genre Alaska law review
Alaska
genre_facet Alaska law review
Alaska
op_source Alaska Law Review
op_relation https://scholarship.law.duke.edu/alr/vol30/iss2/4
https://scholarship.law.duke.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1366&context=alr
_version_ 1766125683002572800