State of Alaska v. Native Village of Tanana: Enhancing Tribal Power by Affirming Concurrent Tribal Jurisdiction to Initiate ICWA Defined Child Custody Proceedings, Both Inside and Outside of Indian Country

This Article provides an overview of the significant cases that have defined state-tribal relations in Alaska as related to Indian child proceedings and further discusses various policies that have been implemented over time. After outlining these cases and shifting policies, the Article examines th...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Kendall-Miller, Heather
Format: Text
Language:unknown
Published: Duke University School of Law 2011
Subjects:
Family Law
Indigenous
Indian
and Aboriginal Law
Alaska law review
Alaska
Online Access:https://scholarship.law.duke.edu/alr/vol28/iss2/1
https://scholarship.law.duke.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1017&context=alr
id ftdukeunivlaw:oai:scholarship.law.duke.edu:alr-1017
record_format openpolar
spelling ftdukeunivlaw:oai:scholarship.law.duke.edu:alr-1017 2023-05-15T13:08:50+02:00 State of Alaska v. Native Village of Tanana: Enhancing Tribal Power by Affirming Concurrent Tribal Jurisdiction to Initiate ICWA Defined Child Custody Proceedings, Both Inside and Outside of Indian Country Kendall-Miller, Heather 2011-12-01T08:00:00Z application/pdf https://scholarship.law.duke.edu/alr/vol28/iss2/1 https://scholarship.law.duke.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1017&context=alr unknown Duke University School of Law https://scholarship.law.duke.edu/alr/vol28/iss2/1 https://scholarship.law.duke.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1017&context=alr Alaska Law Review Family Law Indigenous Indian and Aboriginal Law text 2011 ftdukeunivlaw 2023-01-23T21:06:29Z This Article provides an overview of the significant cases that have defined state-tribal relations in Alaska as related to Indian child proceedings and further discusses various policies that have been implemented over time. After outlining these cases and shifting policies, the Article examines the current state of the law in Alaska with a focus on State v. Native Village of Tanana, which clarified confusion regarding the inherent jurisdiction held by federally recognized Alaska Native tribes to initiate the Indian Child Welfare Act (ICWA)-defined child custody proceedings. Finally, the Article discusses those jurisdictional questions left unresolved by Tanana to be decided at a later time under specific factual circumstances. Text Alaska law review Alaska Duke Law School Scholarship Repository Indian
institution Open Polar
collection Duke Law School Scholarship Repository
op_collection_id ftdukeunivlaw
language unknown
topic Family Law
Indigenous
Indian
and Aboriginal Law
spellingShingle Family Law
Indigenous
Indian
and Aboriginal Law
Kendall-Miller, Heather
State of Alaska v. Native Village of Tanana: Enhancing Tribal Power by Affirming Concurrent Tribal Jurisdiction to Initiate ICWA Defined Child Custody Proceedings, Both Inside and Outside of Indian Country
topic_facet Family Law
Indigenous
Indian
and Aboriginal Law
description This Article provides an overview of the significant cases that have defined state-tribal relations in Alaska as related to Indian child proceedings and further discusses various policies that have been implemented over time. After outlining these cases and shifting policies, the Article examines the current state of the law in Alaska with a focus on State v. Native Village of Tanana, which clarified confusion regarding the inherent jurisdiction held by federally recognized Alaska Native tribes to initiate the Indian Child Welfare Act (ICWA)-defined child custody proceedings. Finally, the Article discusses those jurisdictional questions left unresolved by Tanana to be decided at a later time under specific factual circumstances.
format Text
author Kendall-Miller, Heather
author_facet Kendall-Miller, Heather
author_sort Kendall-Miller, Heather
title State of Alaska v. Native Village of Tanana: Enhancing Tribal Power by Affirming Concurrent Tribal Jurisdiction to Initiate ICWA Defined Child Custody Proceedings, Both Inside and Outside of Indian Country
title_short State of Alaska v. Native Village of Tanana: Enhancing Tribal Power by Affirming Concurrent Tribal Jurisdiction to Initiate ICWA Defined Child Custody Proceedings, Both Inside and Outside of Indian Country
title_full State of Alaska v. Native Village of Tanana: Enhancing Tribal Power by Affirming Concurrent Tribal Jurisdiction to Initiate ICWA Defined Child Custody Proceedings, Both Inside and Outside of Indian Country
title_fullStr State of Alaska v. Native Village of Tanana: Enhancing Tribal Power by Affirming Concurrent Tribal Jurisdiction to Initiate ICWA Defined Child Custody Proceedings, Both Inside and Outside of Indian Country
title_full_unstemmed State of Alaska v. Native Village of Tanana: Enhancing Tribal Power by Affirming Concurrent Tribal Jurisdiction to Initiate ICWA Defined Child Custody Proceedings, Both Inside and Outside of Indian Country
title_sort state of alaska v. native village of tanana: enhancing tribal power by affirming concurrent tribal jurisdiction to initiate icwa defined child custody proceedings, both inside and outside of indian country
publisher Duke University School of Law
publishDate 2011
url https://scholarship.law.duke.edu/alr/vol28/iss2/1
https://scholarship.law.duke.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1017&context=alr
geographic Indian
geographic_facet Indian
genre Alaska law review
Alaska
genre_facet Alaska law review
Alaska
op_source Alaska Law Review
op_relation https://scholarship.law.duke.edu/alr/vol28/iss2/1
https://scholarship.law.duke.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1017&context=alr
_version_ 1766131872624017408

Similar Items