How do PBL schemes in WRF describe summer and winter conditions at a high arctic site?

We compare 4 planetary boundary layer (PBL) schemes of Weather Research and Forecasting model for high Artic conditions, documented during summer and winter campaigns at Station Nord, Greenland. During March 2012, 22 radiosonds were launched at 00 and 12 UTC. During July-August 2011, 25 radiosondes...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Batchvarova, Ekaterina, Kirova, Hristina, Gryning, Sven-Erik, Skov, Henrik, Sørensen, Lise Lotte
Format: Conference Object
Language:English
Published: 2017
Subjects:
Online Access:https://orbit.dtu.dk/en/publications/61547e2e-bc83-40bc-a654-2b181a925bb4
https://backend.orbit.dtu.dk/ws/files/178152094/H18_084_Batchvarova.pdf
id ftdtupubl:oai:pure.atira.dk:publications/61547e2e-bc83-40bc-a654-2b181a925bb4
record_format openpolar
spelling ftdtupubl:oai:pure.atira.dk:publications/61547e2e-bc83-40bc-a654-2b181a925bb4 2023-05-15T14:25:56+02:00 How do PBL schemes in WRF describe summer and winter conditions at a high arctic site? Batchvarova, Ekaterina Kirova, Hristina Gryning, Sven-Erik Skov, Henrik Sørensen, Lise Lotte 2017 application/pdf https://orbit.dtu.dk/en/publications/61547e2e-bc83-40bc-a654-2b181a925bb4 https://backend.orbit.dtu.dk/ws/files/178152094/H18_084_Batchvarova.pdf eng eng info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess Batchvarova , E , Kirova , H , Gryning , S-E , Skov , H & Sørensen , L L 2017 , ' How do PBL schemes in WRF describe summer and winter conditions at a high arctic site? ' , Paper presented at 18th conference on Harmonisation within Atmospheric Dispersion Modelling for Regulatory Purposes, 2017 , Bologna , Italy , 09/10/2017 - 12/10/2017 . Atmospheric Science Pollution Modeling and Simulation Arctic site Planetary boundary layer Radiosoundings WRF model Atmospheric thermodynamics Boundary layers Wind Diurnal variability Horizontal resolution Planetary boundary layers Radio soundings Spatial resolution Weather research and forecasting models Weather forecasting conferenceObject 2017 ftdtupubl 2023-01-12T00:10:30Z We compare 4 planetary boundary layer (PBL) schemes of Weather Research and Forecasting model for high Artic conditions, documented during summer and winter campaigns at Station Nord, Greenland. During March 2012, 22 radiosonds were launched at 00 and 12 UTC. During July-August 2011, 25 radiosondes were launched at 00, 06, 12, and 18 UTC. The chosen PBL schemes are 3 TKE schemes: MYJ, MYNN and QNSE and non-local YSU. Comparison is performed between data from radiosoundings and corresponding in time model results up to different height from 100 m to 8000 m. Sensitivity of model to vertical and spatial resolution is examined with MYJ through 4 configurations combining 26 or 42 vertical levels and 4 km or 1.33 km horizontal grid step. Sensitivity to the resolution tests showed that increasing horizontal resolution from 4 km to 1.33 km did not improve model performance. Increasing the number of vertical layers lead to closer to observed profiles and slightly improved statistics by layers. Sensitivity to the lead time (24 h or 48 h) is examined with MYJ at 1.33 km grid step and 42 vertical layers. Quality of forecast for day 1 and day 2 is similar for the summer. Temperature and wind speed (WS) biases for the winter are with 1 K and 1 ms-1 larger for 48 h compared to 24 h lead time. The lack of diurnal variability during both campaigns is correctly simulated by all PBL schemes. The performed tests show that TKE schemes outperform YSU and as a whole MYNN gives the highest scores. Conference Object Arctic Arctic Greenland Technical University of Denmark: DTU Orbit Arctic Greenland Station Nord ENVELOPE(-16.663,-16.663,81.599,81.599)
institution Open Polar
collection Technical University of Denmark: DTU Orbit
op_collection_id ftdtupubl
language English
topic Atmospheric Science
Pollution
Modeling and Simulation
Arctic site
Planetary boundary layer
Radiosoundings
WRF model
Atmospheric thermodynamics
Boundary layers
Wind
Diurnal variability
Horizontal resolution
Planetary boundary layers
Radio soundings
Spatial resolution
Weather research and forecasting models
Weather forecasting
spellingShingle Atmospheric Science
Pollution
Modeling and Simulation
Arctic site
Planetary boundary layer
Radiosoundings
WRF model
Atmospheric thermodynamics
Boundary layers
Wind
Diurnal variability
Horizontal resolution
Planetary boundary layers
Radio soundings
Spatial resolution
Weather research and forecasting models
Weather forecasting
Batchvarova, Ekaterina
Kirova, Hristina
Gryning, Sven-Erik
Skov, Henrik
Sørensen, Lise Lotte
How do PBL schemes in WRF describe summer and winter conditions at a high arctic site?
topic_facet Atmospheric Science
Pollution
Modeling and Simulation
Arctic site
Planetary boundary layer
Radiosoundings
WRF model
Atmospheric thermodynamics
Boundary layers
Wind
Diurnal variability
Horizontal resolution
Planetary boundary layers
Radio soundings
Spatial resolution
Weather research and forecasting models
Weather forecasting
description We compare 4 planetary boundary layer (PBL) schemes of Weather Research and Forecasting model for high Artic conditions, documented during summer and winter campaigns at Station Nord, Greenland. During March 2012, 22 radiosonds were launched at 00 and 12 UTC. During July-August 2011, 25 radiosondes were launched at 00, 06, 12, and 18 UTC. The chosen PBL schemes are 3 TKE schemes: MYJ, MYNN and QNSE and non-local YSU. Comparison is performed between data from radiosoundings and corresponding in time model results up to different height from 100 m to 8000 m. Sensitivity of model to vertical and spatial resolution is examined with MYJ through 4 configurations combining 26 or 42 vertical levels and 4 km or 1.33 km horizontal grid step. Sensitivity to the resolution tests showed that increasing horizontal resolution from 4 km to 1.33 km did not improve model performance. Increasing the number of vertical layers lead to closer to observed profiles and slightly improved statistics by layers. Sensitivity to the lead time (24 h or 48 h) is examined with MYJ at 1.33 km grid step and 42 vertical layers. Quality of forecast for day 1 and day 2 is similar for the summer. Temperature and wind speed (WS) biases for the winter are with 1 K and 1 ms-1 larger for 48 h compared to 24 h lead time. The lack of diurnal variability during both campaigns is correctly simulated by all PBL schemes. The performed tests show that TKE schemes outperform YSU and as a whole MYNN gives the highest scores.
format Conference Object
author Batchvarova, Ekaterina
Kirova, Hristina
Gryning, Sven-Erik
Skov, Henrik
Sørensen, Lise Lotte
author_facet Batchvarova, Ekaterina
Kirova, Hristina
Gryning, Sven-Erik
Skov, Henrik
Sørensen, Lise Lotte
author_sort Batchvarova, Ekaterina
title How do PBL schemes in WRF describe summer and winter conditions at a high arctic site?
title_short How do PBL schemes in WRF describe summer and winter conditions at a high arctic site?
title_full How do PBL schemes in WRF describe summer and winter conditions at a high arctic site?
title_fullStr How do PBL schemes in WRF describe summer and winter conditions at a high arctic site?
title_full_unstemmed How do PBL schemes in WRF describe summer and winter conditions at a high arctic site?
title_sort how do pbl schemes in wrf describe summer and winter conditions at a high arctic site?
publishDate 2017
url https://orbit.dtu.dk/en/publications/61547e2e-bc83-40bc-a654-2b181a925bb4
https://backend.orbit.dtu.dk/ws/files/178152094/H18_084_Batchvarova.pdf
long_lat ENVELOPE(-16.663,-16.663,81.599,81.599)
geographic Arctic
Greenland
Station Nord
geographic_facet Arctic
Greenland
Station Nord
genre Arctic
Arctic
Greenland
genre_facet Arctic
Arctic
Greenland
op_source Batchvarova , E , Kirova , H , Gryning , S-E , Skov , H & Sørensen , L L 2017 , ' How do PBL schemes in WRF describe summer and winter conditions at a high arctic site? ' , Paper presented at 18th conference on Harmonisation within Atmospheric Dispersion Modelling for Regulatory Purposes, 2017 , Bologna , Italy , 09/10/2017 - 12/10/2017 .
op_rights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
_version_ 1766298432943685632