Greenlandic Waste Incineration Fly And Bottom Ash As Secondary Resource In Mortar

• Published in: International Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning
• Main Authors: Kirkelund, Gunvor Marie, Ottosen, Lisbeth M., Jensen, Pernille Erland, Goltermann, Per
• Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
• Language: English
• Published: 2016
• Subjects: Arctic; Bottom ash; Colour; Compressive strength; Concrete; Electrokinetic; Fly ash; Mortar; Setting time; Washing; Greenland; greenlandic
• Online Access: https://orbit.dtu.dk/en/publications/4b6b2987-8212-4b0c-9b46-1ece6e9f12b0; https://doi.org/10.2495/SDP-V11-N5-719-728; https://backend.orbit.dtu.dk/ws/files/126117416/GLflyAsh.pdf

Today, 900 tons incineration fly ash is shipped abroad annually from Greenland for deposits, whereas the 6,000 tons incineration bottom ash is deposited locally. These incineration ashes could be valuable in concrete production, where the cement has to be shipped to Greenland. For this purpose, the effects on compressive strengths of mortars by substituting cement or sand by raw, washed and electrodialytically treated fly ash or bottom ash were investigated. Parts of the experimental fly ash had been pre-treated by either washing with distilled water or electro-dialytically treated to remove salts and by the latter method, also heavy metals. Mortar samples were cast where cement (5%–20%) or sand (5%–10%) was replaced with fly ash or bottom ash, together with references without replacements. The compressive strengths were measured after 7, 14, 28 and 42 days. Replacing cement by fly ash resulted in lower compressive strength at 20% content of fly ash. At 5% replacement with raw fly ash a compressive strength similar to the reference was seen. However, using washed and electrodialytically treated ash lead to lower strengths. The lowest compressive strength was seen when replacing both sand with bottom ash and cement with fly ash. Based on the compressive strength tests, it is found that using Greenlandic incineration ashes in mortar as 5% cement replacement could consume all ash instead of disposals, and could thus turn the ashes into a local resource and simultaneously reduce the import of cement.