Improving the accuracy and reliability of MWD/magnetic-Wellbore-Directional surveying in the barents sea

The years ahead will see increased petroleum-related activity in the Barents Sea, with operations far off the coast of Norway. The region is at high geomagnetic latitude in the auroral zone, and therefore, directional drilling by use of magnetic reference will experience enlarged azimuth uncertainty...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:SPE Drilling & Completion
Main Authors: Edvardsen, I., Nyrnes, E., Johnsen, M. G., L. Hansen, T., P. Løvhaug, U., Matzka, Jürgen
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: 2014
Subjects:
Online Access:https://orbit.dtu.dk/en/publications/3175128e-f929-4f3f-a85a-224c0f3574d9
https://doi.org/10.2118/166226-pa
id ftdtupubl:oai:pure.atira.dk:publications/3175128e-f929-4f3f-a85a-224c0f3574d9
record_format openpolar
spelling ftdtupubl:oai:pure.atira.dk:publications/3175128e-f929-4f3f-a85a-224c0f3574d9 2024-04-28T08:12:31+00:00 Improving the accuracy and reliability of MWD/magnetic-Wellbore-Directional surveying in the barents sea Edvardsen, I. Nyrnes, E. Johnsen, M. G. L. Hansen, T. P. Løvhaug, U. Matzka, Jürgen 2014 https://orbit.dtu.dk/en/publications/3175128e-f929-4f3f-a85a-224c0f3574d9 https://doi.org/10.2118/166226-pa eng eng https://orbit.dtu.dk/en/publications/3175128e-f929-4f3f-a85a-224c0f3574d9 info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess Edvardsen , I , Nyrnes , E , Johnsen , M G , L. Hansen , T , P. Løvhaug , U & Matzka , J 2014 , ' Improving the accuracy and reliability of MWD/magnetic-Wellbore-Directional surveying in the barents sea ' , S P E Drilling & Completion , vol. 29 , no. 2 , pp. 215-225 . https://doi.org/10.2118/166226-pa Energy Engineering and Power Technology Mechanical Engineering Bottom-hole assembly Directional drilling Drilling equipment Drills Geomagnetism Interference suppression Ionosphere Magnetic materials Offshore gas fields Oil field equipment Oil fields Surveys Continental shelves Efficient managements Magnetic disturbance Magnetic interference Magnetic monitoring Non-magnetic steel Offshore oil and gas fields Oil and gas fields Offshore oil wells accuracy assessment borehole drill bit drilling geomagnetic field magnetic method reliability analysis surveying well technology Arctic Ocean Barents Sea Norway article 2014 ftdtupubl https://doi.org/10.2118/166226-pa 2024-04-10T14:30:09Z The years ahead will see increased petroleum-related activity in the Barents Sea, with operations far off the coast of Norway. The region is at high geomagnetic latitude in the auroral zone, and therefore, directional drilling by use of magnetic reference will experience enlarged azimuth uncertainty compared with operations in the Norwegian and North Seas. Two main contributors to azimuth uncertainty are magnetic disturbances from electric currents in the ionosphere and axial magnetic interference from the drillstring. The former is more frequent in the Barents Sea than farther south, and the effect of the latter is increased because of diminished value of the magnetic horizontal component. Wellbore directional surveying for operations on the continental shelf in the North Sea and the Norwegian Sea rely on wellestablishedprocedures for near-real-time magnetic monitoring by use of onshore magnetic-reference stations. The different land and sea configuration, distant offshore oil and gas fields, higher geomagnetic latitude, and different behavior of the magnetic field require the procedures to be reassessed before being applied to the Barents Sea. To reduce drilling delays, procedures must be implemented to enable efficient management of magnetic disturbances.In some areas of the Barents Sea, the management requires new equipment to be developed and tested before drilling, such as seabed magnetometer stations. One simple way to reduce drillstring interference is increasing the amount of nonmagnetic steel in the bottomhole assembly (BHA). To maintain azimuth uncertaintyat an acceptable level in northern areas, it is crucial that wellbore-directional-surveying requirements are given high priority and considered early during well planning. During the development phase of an oil and gas field, the planned wells must be assigned adequate positional-uncertainty models and, if possible, be designed in a direction that minimizes the wellbore directional uncertainty. ©2014 Society of Petroleum Engineers. Article in Journal/Newspaper Arctic Arctic Ocean Barents Sea Norwegian Sea Technical University of Denmark: DTU Orbit SPE Drilling & Completion 29 02 215 225
institution Open Polar
collection Technical University of Denmark: DTU Orbit
op_collection_id ftdtupubl
language English
topic Energy Engineering and Power Technology
Mechanical Engineering
Bottom-hole assembly
Directional drilling
Drilling equipment
Drills
Geomagnetism
Interference suppression
Ionosphere
Magnetic materials
Offshore gas fields
Oil field equipment
Oil fields
Surveys
Continental shelves
Efficient managements
Magnetic disturbance
Magnetic interference
Magnetic monitoring
Non-magnetic steel
Offshore oil and gas fields
Oil and gas fields
Offshore oil wells
accuracy assessment
borehole
drill bit
drilling
geomagnetic field
magnetic method
reliability analysis
surveying
well technology
Arctic Ocean
Barents Sea
Norway
spellingShingle Energy Engineering and Power Technology
Mechanical Engineering
Bottom-hole assembly
Directional drilling
Drilling equipment
Drills
Geomagnetism
Interference suppression
Ionosphere
Magnetic materials
Offshore gas fields
Oil field equipment
Oil fields
Surveys
Continental shelves
Efficient managements
Magnetic disturbance
Magnetic interference
Magnetic monitoring
Non-magnetic steel
Offshore oil and gas fields
Oil and gas fields
Offshore oil wells
accuracy assessment
borehole
drill bit
drilling
geomagnetic field
magnetic method
reliability analysis
surveying
well technology
Arctic Ocean
Barents Sea
Norway
Edvardsen, I.
Nyrnes, E.
Johnsen, M. G.
L. Hansen, T.
P. Løvhaug, U.
Matzka, Jürgen
Improving the accuracy and reliability of MWD/magnetic-Wellbore-Directional surveying in the barents sea
topic_facet Energy Engineering and Power Technology
Mechanical Engineering
Bottom-hole assembly
Directional drilling
Drilling equipment
Drills
Geomagnetism
Interference suppression
Ionosphere
Magnetic materials
Offshore gas fields
Oil field equipment
Oil fields
Surveys
Continental shelves
Efficient managements
Magnetic disturbance
Magnetic interference
Magnetic monitoring
Non-magnetic steel
Offshore oil and gas fields
Oil and gas fields
Offshore oil wells
accuracy assessment
borehole
drill bit
drilling
geomagnetic field
magnetic method
reliability analysis
surveying
well technology
Arctic Ocean
Barents Sea
Norway
description The years ahead will see increased petroleum-related activity in the Barents Sea, with operations far off the coast of Norway. The region is at high geomagnetic latitude in the auroral zone, and therefore, directional drilling by use of magnetic reference will experience enlarged azimuth uncertainty compared with operations in the Norwegian and North Seas. Two main contributors to azimuth uncertainty are magnetic disturbances from electric currents in the ionosphere and axial magnetic interference from the drillstring. The former is more frequent in the Barents Sea than farther south, and the effect of the latter is increased because of diminished value of the magnetic horizontal component. Wellbore directional surveying for operations on the continental shelf in the North Sea and the Norwegian Sea rely on wellestablishedprocedures for near-real-time magnetic monitoring by use of onshore magnetic-reference stations. The different land and sea configuration, distant offshore oil and gas fields, higher geomagnetic latitude, and different behavior of the magnetic field require the procedures to be reassessed before being applied to the Barents Sea. To reduce drilling delays, procedures must be implemented to enable efficient management of magnetic disturbances.In some areas of the Barents Sea, the management requires new equipment to be developed and tested before drilling, such as seabed magnetometer stations. One simple way to reduce drillstring interference is increasing the amount of nonmagnetic steel in the bottomhole assembly (BHA). To maintain azimuth uncertaintyat an acceptable level in northern areas, it is crucial that wellbore-directional-surveying requirements are given high priority and considered early during well planning. During the development phase of an oil and gas field, the planned wells must be assigned adequate positional-uncertainty models and, if possible, be designed in a direction that minimizes the wellbore directional uncertainty. ©2014 Society of Petroleum Engineers.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Edvardsen, I.
Nyrnes, E.
Johnsen, M. G.
L. Hansen, T.
P. Løvhaug, U.
Matzka, Jürgen
author_facet Edvardsen, I.
Nyrnes, E.
Johnsen, M. G.
L. Hansen, T.
P. Løvhaug, U.
Matzka, Jürgen
author_sort Edvardsen, I.
title Improving the accuracy and reliability of MWD/magnetic-Wellbore-Directional surveying in the barents sea
title_short Improving the accuracy and reliability of MWD/magnetic-Wellbore-Directional surveying in the barents sea
title_full Improving the accuracy and reliability of MWD/magnetic-Wellbore-Directional surveying in the barents sea
title_fullStr Improving the accuracy and reliability of MWD/magnetic-Wellbore-Directional surveying in the barents sea
title_full_unstemmed Improving the accuracy and reliability of MWD/magnetic-Wellbore-Directional surveying in the barents sea
title_sort improving the accuracy and reliability of mwd/magnetic-wellbore-directional surveying in the barents sea
publishDate 2014
url https://orbit.dtu.dk/en/publications/3175128e-f929-4f3f-a85a-224c0f3574d9
https://doi.org/10.2118/166226-pa
genre Arctic
Arctic Ocean
Barents Sea
Norwegian Sea
genre_facet Arctic
Arctic Ocean
Barents Sea
Norwegian Sea
op_source Edvardsen , I , Nyrnes , E , Johnsen , M G , L. Hansen , T , P. Løvhaug , U & Matzka , J 2014 , ' Improving the accuracy and reliability of MWD/magnetic-Wellbore-Directional surveying in the barents sea ' , S P E Drilling & Completion , vol. 29 , no. 2 , pp. 215-225 . https://doi.org/10.2118/166226-pa
op_relation https://orbit.dtu.dk/en/publications/3175128e-f929-4f3f-a85a-224c0f3574d9
op_rights info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess
op_doi https://doi.org/10.2118/166226-pa
container_title SPE Drilling & Completion
container_volume 29
container_issue 02
container_start_page 215
op_container_end_page 225
_version_ 1797579363252699136