International perceptions of an integrated, multi-sectoral, ecosystem approach to management:Editor’s Choice

The Ecosystem Approach to Management (EAM) has emerged over the past decades, largely to promote biodiversity conservation, and more recently sectoral tradeoffs in the management of marine ecosystems. To ascertain the state of practice of EAM operationalization, a workshop was held, which included a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:ICES Journal of Marine Science
Main Authors: Marshak, Anthony R., Link, Jason S., Shuford, Rebecca, Monaco, Mark E., Johannesen, Ellen, Bianchi, Gabriella, Anderson, M. Robin, Olsen, Erik, Smith, David C., Schmidt, Jörn O., Dickey-Collas, Mark
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: 2017
Subjects:
SEA
Online Access:https://orbit.dtu.dk/en/publications/2dad2789-57ec-480e-b243-20e13600c7ef
https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsw214
https://backend.orbit.dtu.dk/ws/files/130966367/Publishers_version.pdf
id ftdtupubl:oai:pure.atira.dk:publications/2dad2789-57ec-480e-b243-20e13600c7ef
record_format openpolar
spelling ftdtupubl:oai:pure.atira.dk:publications/2dad2789-57ec-480e-b243-20e13600c7ef 2024-09-15T18:23:39+00:00 International perceptions of an integrated, multi-sectoral, ecosystem approach to management:Editor’s Choice Marshak, Anthony R. Link, Jason S. Shuford, Rebecca Monaco, Mark E. Johannesen, Ellen Bianchi, Gabriella Anderson, M. Robin Olsen, Erik Smith, David C. Schmidt, Jörn O. Dickey-Collas, Mark 2017 application/pdf https://orbit.dtu.dk/en/publications/2dad2789-57ec-480e-b243-20e13600c7ef https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsw214 https://backend.orbit.dtu.dk/ws/files/130966367/Publishers_version.pdf eng eng https://orbit.dtu.dk/en/publications/2dad2789-57ec-480e-b243-20e13600c7ef info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess Marshak , A R , Link , J S , Shuford , R , Monaco , M E , Johannesen , E , Bianchi , G , Anderson , M R , Olsen , E , Smith , D C , Schmidt , J O & Dickey-Collas , M 2017 , ' International perceptions of an integrated, multi-sectoral, ecosystem approach to management : Editor’s Choice ' , ICES Journal of Marine Science , vol. 74 , no. 1 , pp. 414-420 . https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsw214 FISHERIES MARINE OCEANOGRAPHY FISHERIES MANAGEMENT IMPLEMENTATION PROGRESS MYTHS SEA ecosystem approach to management ecosystem-based management multisector ocean use sector tradeoffs /dk/atira/pure/sustainabledevelopmentgoals/life_below_water name=SDG 14 - Life Below Water article 2017 ftdtupubl https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsw214 2024-07-15T23:49:10Z The Ecosystem Approach to Management (EAM) has emerged over the past decades, largely to promote biodiversity conservation, and more recently sectoral tradeoffs in the management of marine ecosystems. To ascertain the state of practice of EAM operationalization, a workshop was held, which included a pre-workshop online survey. The survey gauged international participants' perspectives regarding capacity, knowledge, and application of EAM. When asked about the subject, most survey respondents had a general understanding of EAM, and provided a clear definition. Major perceived challenges to EAM objectives by those surveyed included limited knowledge, conflicting interests, insufficient communication, and limited organizational legal frameworks or governance structures. Of those directly involved in an ecosystem approach, the majority responded that processes were in place or developed for application of integrated knowledge toward assessing key issues within their respective sectors (i. e. fisheries, conservation, energy), and that capacity was generally high. Our results show that most respondents, irrespective of sector or geography, see value in considering an integrated, broader ecosystem approach as they manage their sector. Although many participants were from the North Atlantic region, our results suggest that much of the international community is converging toward continued understanding of broad-scale, integrated approaches to marine resource management. Article in Journal/Newspaper North Atlantic Technical University of Denmark: DTU Orbit ICES Journal of Marine Science 74 1 414 420
institution Open Polar
collection Technical University of Denmark: DTU Orbit
op_collection_id ftdtupubl
language English
topic FISHERIES
MARINE
OCEANOGRAPHY
FISHERIES MANAGEMENT
IMPLEMENTATION
PROGRESS
MYTHS
SEA
ecosystem approach to management
ecosystem-based management
multisector
ocean use
sector tradeoffs
/dk/atira/pure/sustainabledevelopmentgoals/life_below_water
name=SDG 14 - Life Below Water
spellingShingle FISHERIES
MARINE
OCEANOGRAPHY
FISHERIES MANAGEMENT
IMPLEMENTATION
PROGRESS
MYTHS
SEA
ecosystem approach to management
ecosystem-based management
multisector
ocean use
sector tradeoffs
/dk/atira/pure/sustainabledevelopmentgoals/life_below_water
name=SDG 14 - Life Below Water
Marshak, Anthony R.
Link, Jason S.
Shuford, Rebecca
Monaco, Mark E.
Johannesen, Ellen
Bianchi, Gabriella
Anderson, M. Robin
Olsen, Erik
Smith, David C.
Schmidt, Jörn O.
Dickey-Collas, Mark
International perceptions of an integrated, multi-sectoral, ecosystem approach to management:Editor’s Choice
topic_facet FISHERIES
MARINE
OCEANOGRAPHY
FISHERIES MANAGEMENT
IMPLEMENTATION
PROGRESS
MYTHS
SEA
ecosystem approach to management
ecosystem-based management
multisector
ocean use
sector tradeoffs
/dk/atira/pure/sustainabledevelopmentgoals/life_below_water
name=SDG 14 - Life Below Water
description The Ecosystem Approach to Management (EAM) has emerged over the past decades, largely to promote biodiversity conservation, and more recently sectoral tradeoffs in the management of marine ecosystems. To ascertain the state of practice of EAM operationalization, a workshop was held, which included a pre-workshop online survey. The survey gauged international participants' perspectives regarding capacity, knowledge, and application of EAM. When asked about the subject, most survey respondents had a general understanding of EAM, and provided a clear definition. Major perceived challenges to EAM objectives by those surveyed included limited knowledge, conflicting interests, insufficient communication, and limited organizational legal frameworks or governance structures. Of those directly involved in an ecosystem approach, the majority responded that processes were in place or developed for application of integrated knowledge toward assessing key issues within their respective sectors (i. e. fisheries, conservation, energy), and that capacity was generally high. Our results show that most respondents, irrespective of sector or geography, see value in considering an integrated, broader ecosystem approach as they manage their sector. Although many participants were from the North Atlantic region, our results suggest that much of the international community is converging toward continued understanding of broad-scale, integrated approaches to marine resource management.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Marshak, Anthony R.
Link, Jason S.
Shuford, Rebecca
Monaco, Mark E.
Johannesen, Ellen
Bianchi, Gabriella
Anderson, M. Robin
Olsen, Erik
Smith, David C.
Schmidt, Jörn O.
Dickey-Collas, Mark
author_facet Marshak, Anthony R.
Link, Jason S.
Shuford, Rebecca
Monaco, Mark E.
Johannesen, Ellen
Bianchi, Gabriella
Anderson, M. Robin
Olsen, Erik
Smith, David C.
Schmidt, Jörn O.
Dickey-Collas, Mark
author_sort Marshak, Anthony R.
title International perceptions of an integrated, multi-sectoral, ecosystem approach to management:Editor’s Choice
title_short International perceptions of an integrated, multi-sectoral, ecosystem approach to management:Editor’s Choice
title_full International perceptions of an integrated, multi-sectoral, ecosystem approach to management:Editor’s Choice
title_fullStr International perceptions of an integrated, multi-sectoral, ecosystem approach to management:Editor’s Choice
title_full_unstemmed International perceptions of an integrated, multi-sectoral, ecosystem approach to management:Editor’s Choice
title_sort international perceptions of an integrated, multi-sectoral, ecosystem approach to management:editor’s choice
publishDate 2017
url https://orbit.dtu.dk/en/publications/2dad2789-57ec-480e-b243-20e13600c7ef
https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsw214
https://backend.orbit.dtu.dk/ws/files/130966367/Publishers_version.pdf
genre North Atlantic
genre_facet North Atlantic
op_source Marshak , A R , Link , J S , Shuford , R , Monaco , M E , Johannesen , E , Bianchi , G , Anderson , M R , Olsen , E , Smith , D C , Schmidt , J O & Dickey-Collas , M 2017 , ' International perceptions of an integrated, multi-sectoral, ecosystem approach to management : Editor’s Choice ' , ICES Journal of Marine Science , vol. 74 , no. 1 , pp. 414-420 . https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsw214
op_relation https://orbit.dtu.dk/en/publications/2dad2789-57ec-480e-b243-20e13600c7ef
op_rights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsw214
container_title ICES Journal of Marine Science
container_volume 74
container_issue 1
container_start_page 414
op_container_end_page 420
_version_ 1810463889365663744