SPIDER 2 Tests - Response Of Typical Wall Panels To Debris And Fragment Impact

As part of the U.S. Department of Defense Explosives Safety Board (DDESB) Project ESKIMORE, the Science Panel Impact Debris Evaluation and Review (SPIDER) test program has been planned to develop improved predictions for the hazards inside an exposed site (ES) from fragments and debris. Data collect...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Crull, Michelle, Tatom, John W., Conway, Robert T.
Other Authors: ARMY ENGINEERING AND SUPPORT CENTER HUNTSVILLE AL
Format: Text
Language:English
Published: 2010
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.dtic.mil/docs/citations/ADA532107
http://oai.dtic.mil/oai/oai?&verb=getRecord&metadataPrefix=html&identifier=ADA532107
id ftdtic:ADA532107
record_format openpolar
spelling ftdtic:ADA532107 2023-05-15T16:06:40+02:00 SPIDER 2 Tests - Response Of Typical Wall Panels To Debris And Fragment Impact Crull, Michelle Tatom, John W. Conway, Robert T. ARMY ENGINEERING AND SUPPORT CENTER HUNTSVILLE AL 2010-07 text/html http://www.dtic.mil/docs/citations/ADA532107 http://oai.dtic.mil/oai/oai?&verb=getRecord&metadataPrefix=html&identifier=ADA532107 en eng http://www.dtic.mil/docs/citations/ADA532107 Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. DTIC Safety Engineering Structural Engineering and Building Technology Ammunition and Explosives *SAFETY *DEBRIS *WALLS *AMMUNITION FRAGMENTS SITES CONCRETE EXPLOSIVES PENETRATION CROSS SECTIONS BLAST RESISTANT SHELTERS SPALLATION PERFORATION DEFORMATION PANELS HAZARDS TEST AND EVALUATION SYMPOSIA BRIEFING CHARTS SPIDER(SCIENCE PANEL IMPACT DEBRIS EVALUATION AND REVIEW) ES(EXPOSED SITES) PES(POTENTIAL EXPLOSION SITES) PROJECT ESKIMORE STEEL FRAGMENTS BREACHING SPALLING Text 2010 ftdtic 2016-02-23T04:11:22Z As part of the U.S. Department of Defense Explosives Safety Board (DDESB) Project ESKIMORE, the Science Panel Impact Debris Evaluation and Review (SPIDER) test program has been planned to develop improved predictions for the hazards inside an exposed site (ES) from fragments and debris. Data collected includes the mass and velocity required for perforation of the test cross-section and characteristics of all debris produced inside the ES. The 2004 SPIDER 1 test program tested the hazard from high-angle debris striking typical roof sections at terminal velocity. Similarly, the 2009 SPIDER 2 test program conducted at Redstone Arsenal tested the effect of debris and fragments impacting wall cross-sections. The wall response (e.g. penetration, deformation, spalling, breaching, perforation) to variable masses and velocities of spherical steel and concrete impactors was determined. Impact velocity and residual velocity of perforating fragments and ES debris were measured for each test. A trajectory analysis was used to choose SPIDER 2 steel and concrete impactor characteristics consistent with the masses, initial potential explosion site (PES) debris velocities (< 3000 fps), and low launch angles (< 15 degrees) that can critically impact walls at 500 to 3000 ft from the PES. Primary steel fragments, with initial velocities of < 5000 fps, were also included in the trajectory analysis. See also ADM002313. Department of Defense Explosives Safety Board Seminar (34th) held in Portland, Oregon on 13-15 July 2010. Document contains briefing charts. The original document contains color images. Text eskimo* Defense Technical Information Center: DTIC Technical Reports database
institution Open Polar
collection Defense Technical Information Center: DTIC Technical Reports database
op_collection_id ftdtic
language English
topic Safety Engineering
Structural Engineering and Building Technology
Ammunition and Explosives
*SAFETY
*DEBRIS
*WALLS
*AMMUNITION FRAGMENTS
SITES
CONCRETE
EXPLOSIVES
PENETRATION
CROSS SECTIONS
BLAST RESISTANT SHELTERS
SPALLATION
PERFORATION
DEFORMATION
PANELS
HAZARDS
TEST AND EVALUATION
SYMPOSIA
BRIEFING CHARTS
SPIDER(SCIENCE PANEL IMPACT DEBRIS EVALUATION AND REVIEW)
ES(EXPOSED SITES)
PES(POTENTIAL EXPLOSION SITES)
PROJECT ESKIMORE
STEEL FRAGMENTS
BREACHING
SPALLING
spellingShingle Safety Engineering
Structural Engineering and Building Technology
Ammunition and Explosives
*SAFETY
*DEBRIS
*WALLS
*AMMUNITION FRAGMENTS
SITES
CONCRETE
EXPLOSIVES
PENETRATION
CROSS SECTIONS
BLAST RESISTANT SHELTERS
SPALLATION
PERFORATION
DEFORMATION
PANELS
HAZARDS
TEST AND EVALUATION
SYMPOSIA
BRIEFING CHARTS
SPIDER(SCIENCE PANEL IMPACT DEBRIS EVALUATION AND REVIEW)
ES(EXPOSED SITES)
PES(POTENTIAL EXPLOSION SITES)
PROJECT ESKIMORE
STEEL FRAGMENTS
BREACHING
SPALLING
Crull, Michelle
Tatom, John W.
Conway, Robert T.
SPIDER 2 Tests - Response Of Typical Wall Panels To Debris And Fragment Impact
topic_facet Safety Engineering
Structural Engineering and Building Technology
Ammunition and Explosives
*SAFETY
*DEBRIS
*WALLS
*AMMUNITION FRAGMENTS
SITES
CONCRETE
EXPLOSIVES
PENETRATION
CROSS SECTIONS
BLAST RESISTANT SHELTERS
SPALLATION
PERFORATION
DEFORMATION
PANELS
HAZARDS
TEST AND EVALUATION
SYMPOSIA
BRIEFING CHARTS
SPIDER(SCIENCE PANEL IMPACT DEBRIS EVALUATION AND REVIEW)
ES(EXPOSED SITES)
PES(POTENTIAL EXPLOSION SITES)
PROJECT ESKIMORE
STEEL FRAGMENTS
BREACHING
SPALLING
description As part of the U.S. Department of Defense Explosives Safety Board (DDESB) Project ESKIMORE, the Science Panel Impact Debris Evaluation and Review (SPIDER) test program has been planned to develop improved predictions for the hazards inside an exposed site (ES) from fragments and debris. Data collected includes the mass and velocity required for perforation of the test cross-section and characteristics of all debris produced inside the ES. The 2004 SPIDER 1 test program tested the hazard from high-angle debris striking typical roof sections at terminal velocity. Similarly, the 2009 SPIDER 2 test program conducted at Redstone Arsenal tested the effect of debris and fragments impacting wall cross-sections. The wall response (e.g. penetration, deformation, spalling, breaching, perforation) to variable masses and velocities of spherical steel and concrete impactors was determined. Impact velocity and residual velocity of perforating fragments and ES debris were measured for each test. A trajectory analysis was used to choose SPIDER 2 steel and concrete impactor characteristics consistent with the masses, initial potential explosion site (PES) debris velocities (< 3000 fps), and low launch angles (< 15 degrees) that can critically impact walls at 500 to 3000 ft from the PES. Primary steel fragments, with initial velocities of < 5000 fps, were also included in the trajectory analysis. See also ADM002313. Department of Defense Explosives Safety Board Seminar (34th) held in Portland, Oregon on 13-15 July 2010. Document contains briefing charts. The original document contains color images.
author2 ARMY ENGINEERING AND SUPPORT CENTER HUNTSVILLE AL
format Text
author Crull, Michelle
Tatom, John W.
Conway, Robert T.
author_facet Crull, Michelle
Tatom, John W.
Conway, Robert T.
author_sort Crull, Michelle
title SPIDER 2 Tests - Response Of Typical Wall Panels To Debris And Fragment Impact
title_short SPIDER 2 Tests - Response Of Typical Wall Panels To Debris And Fragment Impact
title_full SPIDER 2 Tests - Response Of Typical Wall Panels To Debris And Fragment Impact
title_fullStr SPIDER 2 Tests - Response Of Typical Wall Panels To Debris And Fragment Impact
title_full_unstemmed SPIDER 2 Tests - Response Of Typical Wall Panels To Debris And Fragment Impact
title_sort spider 2 tests - response of typical wall panels to debris and fragment impact
publishDate 2010
url http://www.dtic.mil/docs/citations/ADA532107
http://oai.dtic.mil/oai/oai?&verb=getRecord&metadataPrefix=html&identifier=ADA532107
genre eskimo*
genre_facet eskimo*
op_source DTIC
op_relation http://www.dtic.mil/docs/citations/ADA532107
op_rights Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.
_version_ 1766402664447344640