Reanalysis of Skylab S-194 L-band Data in View of Validating Sea Surface Roughness Corrections for Salinity Measurements from Space

Of the satellite radiometer sensors, there has been only one instrument that provides any heritage at L-band: the Skylab S-194 instrument that operated in the 1970s. From an analysis of S-194 brightness temperature (Tb) sensitivity to SSS, SST and wind speed, Lerner & Hollinger (1976) concluded...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Reul, Nicolas, Tenerelli, Joseph, Vandemark, Doug, Chapron, Bertrand
Other Authors: IFREMER CENTRE DE BREST PLOUZANE (FRANCE) LABORATOIRE D'OCEANOGRAPHIE SPATIALE
Format: Text
Language:English
Published: 2005
Subjects:
Cartography and Aerial Photography
Physical and Dynamic Oceanography
Cybernetics
Operations Research
*OCEAN SURFACE
*SURFACE ROUGHNESS
*SALINITY
SYMPOSIA
SATELLITE IMAGERY
L BAND
FRANCE
RADIOMETERS
COMPONENT REPORTS
FOREIGN REPORTS
BRIGHTNESS TEMPERATURE
SKYLAB(SATELLITE)
SEA SURFACE SALINITY
SEA SURFACE EMISSIVITY
SEA SURFACE TEMPERATURE
Bering Sea
Online Access:http://www.dtic.mil/docs/citations/ADA451491
http://oai.dtic.mil/oai/oai?&verb=getRecord&metadataPrefix=html&identifier=ADA451491
Description
Summary:Of the satellite radiometer sensors, there has been only one instrument that provides any heritage at L-band: the Skylab S-194 instrument that operated in the 1970s. From an analysis of S-194 brightness temperature (Tb) sensitivity to SSS, SST and wind speed, Lerner & Hollinger (1976) concluded that the wind speed dependence of L-band brightness temperature at nadir is about 0.16 K/knot. This is almost four times higher than what is predicted by recently developed sea surface emissivity models at L-band and twice the experimental value reported during the Bering Sea Experiments. To investigate the possible reasons for such discrepancies, two data sets acquired by the S-194 Skylab instrument from 1973-1974 missions are used in the present paper in conjunction with products from climate model reanalysis projects as ancillary data. The re-analyses shows that it is very likely that Lerner & Hollinger overpredicted the quasi-linear wind speed dependence of L-band sea surface emissivity at nadir by a factor of about 2, main discrepancies being due to different wind speed data used in the analysis. Still, we found that emissivity models for the foam free sea surface based on the small perturbation method underestimate the roughness impact at nadir by a factor of 2. Including the foam impact cannot explain all the differences. Presented at the International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (25th) (IGARSS 2005) held in Seoul, Korea on 25-29 Jul 2005. See also ADM001850, Proceedings of the IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, 2005. ISBN 0-7803-9051-2 (DVD ROM); 0-7803-9050-4(pbk).

Similar Items