Impulse Radar Sounding of Level First-Year Sea Ice from an Icebreaker.

During the weeks of May 1984, a CRREL impulse radar system was used onboard the R V Polarstern to measure the thickness of level first-year sea ice. The purpose was to determine the onboard performance of the radar system and, if possible, provide ice thickness information to researchers conducting...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Martinson,Carl R.
Other Authors: COLD REGIONS RESEARCH AND ENGINEERING LAB HANOVER NH
Format: Text
Language:English
Published: 1985
Subjects:
Ice
Online Access:http://www.dtic.mil/docs/citations/ADA163229
http://oai.dtic.mil/oai/oai?&verb=getRecord&metadataPrefix=html&identifier=ADA163229
id ftdtic:ADA163229
record_format openpolar
spelling ftdtic:ADA163229 2023-05-15T16:37:15+02:00 Impulse Radar Sounding of Level First-Year Sea Ice from an Icebreaker. Martinson,Carl R. COLD REGIONS RESEARCH AND ENGINEERING LAB HANOVER NH 1985-11 text/html http://www.dtic.mil/docs/citations/ADA163229 http://oai.dtic.mil/oai/oai?&verb=getRecord&metadataPrefix=html&identifier=ADA163229 en eng http://www.dtic.mil/docs/citations/ADA163229 APPROVED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE DTIC AND NTIS Snow Ice and Permafrost Active & Passive Radar Detection & Equipment *RADAR *SEA ICE THICKNESS SHIPBOARD RADAR EQUIPMENT RADAR ANTENNAS ULTRAHIGH FREQUENCY RESEARCH SHIPS SOUNDING PE61101A AS91D Text 1985 ftdtic 2016-02-21T01:22:05Z During the weeks of May 1984, a CRREL impulse radar system was used onboard the R V Polarstern to measure the thickness of level first-year sea ice. The purpose was to determine the onboard performance of the radar system and, if possible, provide ice thickness information to researchers conducting other tests. Radar data were compared with ice thickness determined by drilling, indicating that radar soundings could be a viable means of collecting ice thickness information, A lack of adequate coordination between the two measurements methods prevented a point-by-point comparison of ice thicknesses; the comparisons were based on averages for particular test runs. The differences of the averages for the two measuring methods ranged from 0.03 m to 0.22 m with a mean variation in the differences of 0.13 m fore eight runs. There may have been some interference from the ship's hull during data collection because of the location of the antenna. However, an unidentified signal in some of the data does not appear to obscure a valid return from the bottom of the ice sheet. (Author) Errata sheet inserted. Text Ice Ice Sheet permafrost Sea ice Defense Technical Information Center: DTIC Technical Reports database
institution Open Polar
collection Defense Technical Information Center: DTIC Technical Reports database
op_collection_id ftdtic
language English
topic Snow
Ice and Permafrost
Active & Passive Radar Detection & Equipment
*RADAR
*SEA ICE
THICKNESS
SHIPBOARD
RADAR EQUIPMENT
RADAR ANTENNAS
ULTRAHIGH FREQUENCY
RESEARCH SHIPS
SOUNDING
PE61101A
AS91D
spellingShingle Snow
Ice and Permafrost
Active & Passive Radar Detection & Equipment
*RADAR
*SEA ICE
THICKNESS
SHIPBOARD
RADAR EQUIPMENT
RADAR ANTENNAS
ULTRAHIGH FREQUENCY
RESEARCH SHIPS
SOUNDING
PE61101A
AS91D
Martinson,Carl R.
Impulse Radar Sounding of Level First-Year Sea Ice from an Icebreaker.
topic_facet Snow
Ice and Permafrost
Active & Passive Radar Detection & Equipment
*RADAR
*SEA ICE
THICKNESS
SHIPBOARD
RADAR EQUIPMENT
RADAR ANTENNAS
ULTRAHIGH FREQUENCY
RESEARCH SHIPS
SOUNDING
PE61101A
AS91D
description During the weeks of May 1984, a CRREL impulse radar system was used onboard the R V Polarstern to measure the thickness of level first-year sea ice. The purpose was to determine the onboard performance of the radar system and, if possible, provide ice thickness information to researchers conducting other tests. Radar data were compared with ice thickness determined by drilling, indicating that radar soundings could be a viable means of collecting ice thickness information, A lack of adequate coordination between the two measurements methods prevented a point-by-point comparison of ice thicknesses; the comparisons were based on averages for particular test runs. The differences of the averages for the two measuring methods ranged from 0.03 m to 0.22 m with a mean variation in the differences of 0.13 m fore eight runs. There may have been some interference from the ship's hull during data collection because of the location of the antenna. However, an unidentified signal in some of the data does not appear to obscure a valid return from the bottom of the ice sheet. (Author) Errata sheet inserted.
author2 COLD REGIONS RESEARCH AND ENGINEERING LAB HANOVER NH
format Text
author Martinson,Carl R.
author_facet Martinson,Carl R.
author_sort Martinson,Carl R.
title Impulse Radar Sounding of Level First-Year Sea Ice from an Icebreaker.
title_short Impulse Radar Sounding of Level First-Year Sea Ice from an Icebreaker.
title_full Impulse Radar Sounding of Level First-Year Sea Ice from an Icebreaker.
title_fullStr Impulse Radar Sounding of Level First-Year Sea Ice from an Icebreaker.
title_full_unstemmed Impulse Radar Sounding of Level First-Year Sea Ice from an Icebreaker.
title_sort impulse radar sounding of level first-year sea ice from an icebreaker.
publishDate 1985
url http://www.dtic.mil/docs/citations/ADA163229
http://oai.dtic.mil/oai/oai?&verb=getRecord&metadataPrefix=html&identifier=ADA163229
genre Ice
Ice Sheet
permafrost
Sea ice
genre_facet Ice
Ice Sheet
permafrost
Sea ice
op_source DTIC AND NTIS
op_relation http://www.dtic.mil/docs/citations/ADA163229
op_rights APPROVED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
_version_ 1766027546634223616