Comparative Analysis of the U.S.S.R. Construction Codes and the U.S. Army Technical Manual for Design of Foundations on Permafrost

A comparative study was made of design criteria and analytical methods for footings and pile foundations on permafrost employed in U.S.S.R. Design Code SNiP II-18-76 (1977) and U.S. Army Cold Regions Research and Engineering Laboratory Special Report 80-34. The absence of adequate constitutive equat...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Fish,Anatoly M
Other Authors: MASSACHUSETTS INST OF TECH CAMBRIDGE DEPT OF CIVIL ENGINEERING
Format: Text
Language:English
Published: 1982
Subjects:
Ice
Online Access:http://www.dtic.mil/docs/citations/ADA116234
http://oai.dtic.mil/oai/oai?&verb=getRecord&metadataPrefix=html&identifier=ADA116234
id ftdtic:ADA116234
record_format openpolar
spelling ftdtic:ADA116234 2023-05-15T15:55:48+02:00 Comparative Analysis of the U.S.S.R. Construction Codes and the U.S. Army Technical Manual for Design of Foundations on Permafrost Fish,Anatoly M MASSACHUSETTS INST OF TECH CAMBRIDGE DEPT OF CIVIL ENGINEERING 1982-05 text/html http://www.dtic.mil/docs/citations/ADA116234 http://oai.dtic.mil/oai/oai?&verb=getRecord&metadataPrefix=html&identifier=ADA116234 en eng http://www.dtic.mil/docs/citations/ADA116234 APPROVED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE DTIC AND NTIS Snow Ice and Permafrost Structural Engineering and Building Technology *Foundations(Structures) *Permafrost Pile structures Soils Freezing Bearing strength Loads(Forces) Construction Standards United States USSR Comparison Footings Text 1982 ftdtic 2016-02-19T08:09:09Z A comparative study was made of design criteria and analytical methods for footings and pile foundations on permafrost employed in U.S.S.R. Design Code SNiP II-18-76 (1977) and U.S. Army Cold Regions Research and Engineering Laboratory Special Report 80-34. The absence of adequate constitutive equations for frozen soils and of rigorous solutions of the boundary problems has made it necessary to incorporate (explicity or implicity) various safety factors in the foundation analyses. From the review it is concluded that the principal difference between these practices is in the assessment and application of appropriate values of safety factors, which leads to a substantial discrepancy in the dimensions and cost of footings and pile foundations in permafrost. See also Rept. no. CRREL-SR-80-34, AD-A090 324. Text Cold Regions Research and Engineering Laboratory Ice permafrost Defense Technical Information Center: DTIC Technical Reports database
institution Open Polar
collection Defense Technical Information Center: DTIC Technical Reports database
op_collection_id ftdtic
language English
topic Snow
Ice and Permafrost
Structural Engineering and Building Technology
*Foundations(Structures)
*Permafrost
Pile structures
Soils
Freezing
Bearing strength
Loads(Forces)
Construction
Standards
United States
USSR
Comparison
Footings
spellingShingle Snow
Ice and Permafrost
Structural Engineering and Building Technology
*Foundations(Structures)
*Permafrost
Pile structures
Soils
Freezing
Bearing strength
Loads(Forces)
Construction
Standards
United States
USSR
Comparison
Footings
Fish,Anatoly M
Comparative Analysis of the U.S.S.R. Construction Codes and the U.S. Army Technical Manual for Design of Foundations on Permafrost
topic_facet Snow
Ice and Permafrost
Structural Engineering and Building Technology
*Foundations(Structures)
*Permafrost
Pile structures
Soils
Freezing
Bearing strength
Loads(Forces)
Construction
Standards
United States
USSR
Comparison
Footings
description A comparative study was made of design criteria and analytical methods for footings and pile foundations on permafrost employed in U.S.S.R. Design Code SNiP II-18-76 (1977) and U.S. Army Cold Regions Research and Engineering Laboratory Special Report 80-34. The absence of adequate constitutive equations for frozen soils and of rigorous solutions of the boundary problems has made it necessary to incorporate (explicity or implicity) various safety factors in the foundation analyses. From the review it is concluded that the principal difference between these practices is in the assessment and application of appropriate values of safety factors, which leads to a substantial discrepancy in the dimensions and cost of footings and pile foundations in permafrost. See also Rept. no. CRREL-SR-80-34, AD-A090 324.
author2 MASSACHUSETTS INST OF TECH CAMBRIDGE DEPT OF CIVIL ENGINEERING
format Text
author Fish,Anatoly M
author_facet Fish,Anatoly M
author_sort Fish,Anatoly M
title Comparative Analysis of the U.S.S.R. Construction Codes and the U.S. Army Technical Manual for Design of Foundations on Permafrost
title_short Comparative Analysis of the U.S.S.R. Construction Codes and the U.S. Army Technical Manual for Design of Foundations on Permafrost
title_full Comparative Analysis of the U.S.S.R. Construction Codes and the U.S. Army Technical Manual for Design of Foundations on Permafrost
title_fullStr Comparative Analysis of the U.S.S.R. Construction Codes and the U.S. Army Technical Manual for Design of Foundations on Permafrost
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Analysis of the U.S.S.R. Construction Codes and the U.S. Army Technical Manual for Design of Foundations on Permafrost
title_sort comparative analysis of the u.s.s.r. construction codes and the u.s. army technical manual for design of foundations on permafrost
publishDate 1982
url http://www.dtic.mil/docs/citations/ADA116234
http://oai.dtic.mil/oai/oai?&verb=getRecord&metadataPrefix=html&identifier=ADA116234
genre Cold Regions Research and Engineering Laboratory
Ice
permafrost
genre_facet Cold Regions Research and Engineering Laboratory
Ice
permafrost
op_source DTIC AND NTIS
op_relation http://www.dtic.mil/docs/citations/ADA116234
op_rights APPROVED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
_version_ 1766391298265186304