Re-evaluation of the NORSAR Detection and Location Capabilities

Analysis on a regional basis of the NORSAR seismic bulletin data for the three years from April 1972 to March 1975 shows that there has been no significant temporal change in the detectability during this time period. The detectability has been examined using the least squares cumulative method, the...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Berteussen, K A, Bungum, H, Ringdal, F
Other Authors: ROYAL NORWEGIAN COUNCIL FOR SCIENTIFIC AND INDUSTRIAL RESEARCH KJELLER
Format: Text
Language:English
Published: 1976
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.dtic.mil/docs/citations/ADA029723
http://oai.dtic.mil/oai/oai?&verb=getRecord&metadataPrefix=html&identifier=ADA029723
id ftdtic:ADA029723
record_format openpolar
spelling ftdtic:ADA029723 2023-05-15T16:59:00+02:00 Re-evaluation of the NORSAR Detection and Location Capabilities Berteussen, K A Bungum, H Ringdal, F ROYAL NORWEGIAN COUNCIL FOR SCIENTIFIC AND INDUSTRIAL RESEARCH KJELLER 1976-06-20 text/html http://www.dtic.mil/docs/citations/ADA029723 http://oai.dtic.mil/oai/oai?&verb=getRecord&metadataPrefix=html&identifier=ADA029723 en eng http://www.dtic.mil/docs/citations/ADA029723 Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. DTIC AND NTIS Seismology Seismic Detection and Detectors *SEISMIC ARRAYS *SEISMOLOGY DETECTION EARTHQUAKES JAPAN KAMCHATKA PENINSULA NORWAY NUMERICAL METHODS AND PROCEDURES SEISMIC DATA SEISMOLOGICAL STATIONS Norsar(Norwegian Seismic Array) Norwegian seismic array Kuriles Text 1976 ftdtic 2016-02-24T11:28:22Z Analysis on a regional basis of the NORSAR seismic bulletin data for the three years from April 1972 to March 1975 shows that there has been no significant temporal change in the detectability during this time period. The detectability has been examined using the least squares cumulative method, the least squares incremental method and the Lacoss-Kelly incremental method. The results are fairly consistent, although the incremental methods as expected give higher thresholds; for example, for the Japan-Kuriles-Kamchatka region the three methods give, for the 90% detectability, values at NORSAR magnitudes 3.8, 3.9 and 4.0, respectively. The b- values have also been estimated using a weighted least squares method and the Utsu method, and the median of the b- values from the five techniques are for all regions in the range 0.7 to 1.1, with some regional variations. An extensive comparison with PDE solutions from USGS shows that norsar generally reports somewhat smaller magnitudes. The event locations as published by NORSAR since the beginning of 1973 are generally better than before. For the best regions the median location defference between NORSAR and USGS estimates is about 100 km, and very few regions show any significant differnece between the average distances and azimuths as reported by the two institutions. Text Kamchatka Kamchatka Peninsula Defense Technical Information Center: DTIC Technical Reports database Kamchatka Peninsula ENVELOPE(160.000,160.000,56.000,56.000) Norway
institution Open Polar
collection Defense Technical Information Center: DTIC Technical Reports database
op_collection_id ftdtic
language English
topic Seismology
Seismic Detection and Detectors
*SEISMIC ARRAYS
*SEISMOLOGY
DETECTION
EARTHQUAKES
JAPAN
KAMCHATKA PENINSULA
NORWAY
NUMERICAL METHODS AND PROCEDURES
SEISMIC DATA
SEISMOLOGICAL STATIONS
Norsar(Norwegian Seismic Array)
Norwegian seismic array
Kuriles
spellingShingle Seismology
Seismic Detection and Detectors
*SEISMIC ARRAYS
*SEISMOLOGY
DETECTION
EARTHQUAKES
JAPAN
KAMCHATKA PENINSULA
NORWAY
NUMERICAL METHODS AND PROCEDURES
SEISMIC DATA
SEISMOLOGICAL STATIONS
Norsar(Norwegian Seismic Array)
Norwegian seismic array
Kuriles
Berteussen, K A
Bungum, H
Ringdal, F
Re-evaluation of the NORSAR Detection and Location Capabilities
topic_facet Seismology
Seismic Detection and Detectors
*SEISMIC ARRAYS
*SEISMOLOGY
DETECTION
EARTHQUAKES
JAPAN
KAMCHATKA PENINSULA
NORWAY
NUMERICAL METHODS AND PROCEDURES
SEISMIC DATA
SEISMOLOGICAL STATIONS
Norsar(Norwegian Seismic Array)
Norwegian seismic array
Kuriles
description Analysis on a regional basis of the NORSAR seismic bulletin data for the three years from April 1972 to March 1975 shows that there has been no significant temporal change in the detectability during this time period. The detectability has been examined using the least squares cumulative method, the least squares incremental method and the Lacoss-Kelly incremental method. The results are fairly consistent, although the incremental methods as expected give higher thresholds; for example, for the Japan-Kuriles-Kamchatka region the three methods give, for the 90% detectability, values at NORSAR magnitudes 3.8, 3.9 and 4.0, respectively. The b- values have also been estimated using a weighted least squares method and the Utsu method, and the median of the b- values from the five techniques are for all regions in the range 0.7 to 1.1, with some regional variations. An extensive comparison with PDE solutions from USGS shows that norsar generally reports somewhat smaller magnitudes. The event locations as published by NORSAR since the beginning of 1973 are generally better than before. For the best regions the median location defference between NORSAR and USGS estimates is about 100 km, and very few regions show any significant differnece between the average distances and azimuths as reported by the two institutions.
author2 ROYAL NORWEGIAN COUNCIL FOR SCIENTIFIC AND INDUSTRIAL RESEARCH KJELLER
format Text
author Berteussen, K A
Bungum, H
Ringdal, F
author_facet Berteussen, K A
Bungum, H
Ringdal, F
author_sort Berteussen, K A
title Re-evaluation of the NORSAR Detection and Location Capabilities
title_short Re-evaluation of the NORSAR Detection and Location Capabilities
title_full Re-evaluation of the NORSAR Detection and Location Capabilities
title_fullStr Re-evaluation of the NORSAR Detection and Location Capabilities
title_full_unstemmed Re-evaluation of the NORSAR Detection and Location Capabilities
title_sort re-evaluation of the norsar detection and location capabilities
publishDate 1976
url http://www.dtic.mil/docs/citations/ADA029723
http://oai.dtic.mil/oai/oai?&verb=getRecord&metadataPrefix=html&identifier=ADA029723
long_lat ENVELOPE(160.000,160.000,56.000,56.000)
geographic Kamchatka Peninsula
Norway
geographic_facet Kamchatka Peninsula
Norway
genre Kamchatka
Kamchatka Peninsula
genre_facet Kamchatka
Kamchatka Peninsula
op_source DTIC AND NTIS
op_relation http://www.dtic.mil/docs/citations/ADA029723
op_rights Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.
_version_ 1766051159503536128