Evaluation of Resonant Column Dynamic Testing Devices.

Resonant column tests were performed by six participants in a program designed to evaluate results from various devices. The participants were Dr. V. P. Drnevich, Dr. B. O. Hardin, Dr. R. D. Woods, Shannon and Wilson, Inc., the U.S. Army Engineer Cold Regions Research and Engineering Laboratory, and...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Skoglund,George R., Marcuson,William F. , III, Cunny,Robert W.
Other Authors: ARMY ENGINEER WATERWAYS EXPERIMENT STATION VICKSBURG MISS
Format: Text
Language:English
Published: 1975
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.dtic.mil/docs/citations/ADA005554
http://oai.dtic.mil/oai/oai?&verb=getRecord&metadataPrefix=html&identifier=ADA005554
id ftdtic:ADA005554
record_format openpolar
spelling ftdtic:ADA005554 2023-05-15T15:55:48+02:00 Evaluation of Resonant Column Dynamic Testing Devices. Skoglund,George R. Marcuson,William F. , III Cunny,Robert W. ARMY ENGINEER WATERWAYS EXPERIMENT STATION VICKSBURG MISS 1975-02 text/html http://www.dtic.mil/docs/citations/ADA005554 http://oai.dtic.mil/oai/oai?&verb=getRecord&metadataPrefix=html&identifier=ADA005554 en eng http://www.dtic.mil/docs/citations/ADA005554 APPROVED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE DTIC AND NTIS Soil Mechanics Structural Engineering and Building Technology Test Facilities Equipment and Methods *SOILS *COLUMNS(SUPPORTS) DYNAMIC RESPONSE RESONANT FREQUENCY DYNAMIC LOADS DYNAMIC TESTS TEST FIXTURES VIBRATIONAL SPECTRA *Soil structure interactions Text 1975 ftdtic 2016-02-20T09:10:38Z Resonant column tests were performed by six participants in a program designed to evaluate results from various devices. The participants were Dr. V. P. Drnevich, Dr. B. O. Hardin, Dr. R. D. Woods, Shannon and Wilson, Inc., the U.S. Army Engineer Cold Regions Research and Engineering Laboratory, and the U.S. Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station. Tests were performed on fine sand and clayey silt. Each participant was given more or less identical samples of material and specific instructions intended to keep the test conditions as near identical as possible. Differences in shear and compression miduli ranged from minus 19 to plus 32 percent of the average. These differences could be explained largely by differences in unit weight and specimen preparation techniques. No systematic differences were noted because of differences apparatus used. Text Cold Regions Research and Engineering Laboratory Defense Technical Information Center: DTIC Technical Reports database
institution Open Polar
collection Defense Technical Information Center: DTIC Technical Reports database
op_collection_id ftdtic
language English
topic Soil Mechanics
Structural Engineering and Building Technology
Test Facilities
Equipment and Methods
*SOILS
*COLUMNS(SUPPORTS)
DYNAMIC RESPONSE
RESONANT FREQUENCY
DYNAMIC LOADS
DYNAMIC TESTS
TEST FIXTURES
VIBRATIONAL SPECTRA
*Soil structure interactions
spellingShingle Soil Mechanics
Structural Engineering and Building Technology
Test Facilities
Equipment and Methods
*SOILS
*COLUMNS(SUPPORTS)
DYNAMIC RESPONSE
RESONANT FREQUENCY
DYNAMIC LOADS
DYNAMIC TESTS
TEST FIXTURES
VIBRATIONAL SPECTRA
*Soil structure interactions
Skoglund,George R.
Marcuson,William F. , III
Cunny,Robert W.
Evaluation of Resonant Column Dynamic Testing Devices.
topic_facet Soil Mechanics
Structural Engineering and Building Technology
Test Facilities
Equipment and Methods
*SOILS
*COLUMNS(SUPPORTS)
DYNAMIC RESPONSE
RESONANT FREQUENCY
DYNAMIC LOADS
DYNAMIC TESTS
TEST FIXTURES
VIBRATIONAL SPECTRA
*Soil structure interactions
description Resonant column tests were performed by six participants in a program designed to evaluate results from various devices. The participants were Dr. V. P. Drnevich, Dr. B. O. Hardin, Dr. R. D. Woods, Shannon and Wilson, Inc., the U.S. Army Engineer Cold Regions Research and Engineering Laboratory, and the U.S. Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station. Tests were performed on fine sand and clayey silt. Each participant was given more or less identical samples of material and specific instructions intended to keep the test conditions as near identical as possible. Differences in shear and compression miduli ranged from minus 19 to plus 32 percent of the average. These differences could be explained largely by differences in unit weight and specimen preparation techniques. No systematic differences were noted because of differences apparatus used.
author2 ARMY ENGINEER WATERWAYS EXPERIMENT STATION VICKSBURG MISS
format Text
author Skoglund,George R.
Marcuson,William F. , III
Cunny,Robert W.
author_facet Skoglund,George R.
Marcuson,William F. , III
Cunny,Robert W.
author_sort Skoglund,George R.
title Evaluation of Resonant Column Dynamic Testing Devices.
title_short Evaluation of Resonant Column Dynamic Testing Devices.
title_full Evaluation of Resonant Column Dynamic Testing Devices.
title_fullStr Evaluation of Resonant Column Dynamic Testing Devices.
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of Resonant Column Dynamic Testing Devices.
title_sort evaluation of resonant column dynamic testing devices.
publishDate 1975
url http://www.dtic.mil/docs/citations/ADA005554
http://oai.dtic.mil/oai/oai?&verb=getRecord&metadataPrefix=html&identifier=ADA005554
genre Cold Regions Research and Engineering Laboratory
genre_facet Cold Regions Research and Engineering Laboratory
op_source DTIC AND NTIS
op_relation http://www.dtic.mil/docs/citations/ADA005554
op_rights APPROVED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
_version_ 1766391296126091264