Data from: Genetic connectivity for two bear species at wildlife crossing structures in Banff National Park

Roads can fragment and isolate wildlife populations, which will eventually decrease genetic diversity within populations. Wildlife crossing structures may counteract these impacts, but most crossings are relatively new, and there is little evidence that they facilitate gene flow. We conducted a thre...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sawaya, Michael A., Kalinowski, Steven T., Clevenger, Anthony P.
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:unknown
Published: 2014
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10255/dryad.59502
https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.5q3b3
id ftdryad:oai:v1.datadryad.org:10255/dryad.59502
record_format openpolar
spelling ftdryad:oai:v1.datadryad.org:10255/dryad.59502 2023-05-15T18:42:07+02:00 Data from: Genetic connectivity for two bear species at wildlife crossing structures in Banff National Park Sawaya, Michael A. Kalinowski, Steven T. Clevenger, Anthony P. Banff National Park 2014-12-15T15:22:59Z http://hdl.handle.net/10255/dryad.59502 https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.5q3b3 unknown doi:10.5061/dryad.5q3b3/1 doi:10.1098/rspb.2013.1705 PMID:24552834 doi:10.5061/dryad.5q3b3 http://hdl.handle.net/10255/dryad.59502 connectivity gene flow fragmentation road ursid wildlife crossing structure Article 2014 ftdryad https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.5q3b3 https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.5q3b3/1 https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2013.1705 2020-01-01T15:06:27Z Roads can fragment and isolate wildlife populations, which will eventually decrease genetic diversity within populations. Wildlife crossing structures may counteract these impacts, but most crossings are relatively new, and there is little evidence that they facilitate gene flow. We conducted a three-year research project in Banff National Park, Alberta, to evaluate the effectiveness of wildlife crossings to provide genetic connectivity. Our main objective was to determine how the Trans-Canada Highway and crossing structures along it affect gene flow in grizzly (Ursus arctos) and black bears (Ursus americanus). We compared genetic data generated from wildlife crossings with data collected from greater bear populations. We detected a genetic discontinuity at the highway in grizzly bears but not in black bears. We assigned grizzly bears that used crossings to populations north and south of the highway, providing evidence of bidirectional gene flow and genetic admixture. Parentage tests showed that 47% of black bears and 27% of grizzly bears that used crossings successfully bred, including multiple males and females of both species. Differentiating between dispersal and gene flow is difficult, but we documented gene flow by showing migration, reproduction and genetic admixture. We conclude that wildlife crossings allow sufficient gene flow to prevent genetic isolation. Article in Journal/Newspaper Ursus arctos Dryad Digital Repository (Duke University) Canada
institution Open Polar
collection Dryad Digital Repository (Duke University)
op_collection_id ftdryad
language unknown
topic connectivity
gene flow
fragmentation
road
ursid
wildlife crossing structure
spellingShingle connectivity
gene flow
fragmentation
road
ursid
wildlife crossing structure
Sawaya, Michael A.
Kalinowski, Steven T.
Clevenger, Anthony P.
Data from: Genetic connectivity for two bear species at wildlife crossing structures in Banff National Park
topic_facet connectivity
gene flow
fragmentation
road
ursid
wildlife crossing structure
description Roads can fragment and isolate wildlife populations, which will eventually decrease genetic diversity within populations. Wildlife crossing structures may counteract these impacts, but most crossings are relatively new, and there is little evidence that they facilitate gene flow. We conducted a three-year research project in Banff National Park, Alberta, to evaluate the effectiveness of wildlife crossings to provide genetic connectivity. Our main objective was to determine how the Trans-Canada Highway and crossing structures along it affect gene flow in grizzly (Ursus arctos) and black bears (Ursus americanus). We compared genetic data generated from wildlife crossings with data collected from greater bear populations. We detected a genetic discontinuity at the highway in grizzly bears but not in black bears. We assigned grizzly bears that used crossings to populations north and south of the highway, providing evidence of bidirectional gene flow and genetic admixture. Parentage tests showed that 47% of black bears and 27% of grizzly bears that used crossings successfully bred, including multiple males and females of both species. Differentiating between dispersal and gene flow is difficult, but we documented gene flow by showing migration, reproduction and genetic admixture. We conclude that wildlife crossings allow sufficient gene flow to prevent genetic isolation.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Sawaya, Michael A.
Kalinowski, Steven T.
Clevenger, Anthony P.
author_facet Sawaya, Michael A.
Kalinowski, Steven T.
Clevenger, Anthony P.
author_sort Sawaya, Michael A.
title Data from: Genetic connectivity for two bear species at wildlife crossing structures in Banff National Park
title_short Data from: Genetic connectivity for two bear species at wildlife crossing structures in Banff National Park
title_full Data from: Genetic connectivity for two bear species at wildlife crossing structures in Banff National Park
title_fullStr Data from: Genetic connectivity for two bear species at wildlife crossing structures in Banff National Park
title_full_unstemmed Data from: Genetic connectivity for two bear species at wildlife crossing structures in Banff National Park
title_sort data from: genetic connectivity for two bear species at wildlife crossing structures in banff national park
publishDate 2014
url http://hdl.handle.net/10255/dryad.59502
https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.5q3b3
op_coverage Banff National Park
geographic Canada
geographic_facet Canada
genre Ursus arctos
genre_facet Ursus arctos
op_relation doi:10.5061/dryad.5q3b3/1
doi:10.1098/rspb.2013.1705
PMID:24552834
doi:10.5061/dryad.5q3b3
http://hdl.handle.net/10255/dryad.59502
op_doi https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.5q3b3
https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.5q3b3/1
https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2013.1705
_version_ 1766231731967361024