Long-Term Nitrogen Deposition: Effects on Plant Diversity, Composition, Productivity and Stability. Year 1993 Aboveground biomass data

The purpose of this experiment is to measure how adding nitrogen over a long time will affect the number of species, the type of species present, the amount of annual growth, and the change from year to year in the growth of each species in a plant community which is also relieved of grazing by larg...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Format: Dataset
Language:unknown
Published: 1995
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10255/dryad.27365
http://metacat.lternet.edu/knb/metacat/knb-lter-cdr.799301.2/xml
id ftdryad:oai:v1.datadryad.org:10255/dryad.27365
record_format openpolar
institution Open Polar
collection Dryad Digital Repository (Duke University)
op_collection_id ftdryad
language unknown
topic Cedar Creek Natural History Area
Long Term
Ecology
Successional dynamics
Primary Productivity
Disturbance Patterns
Nutrient Budgets
Nutrient Cycles
Climatic Variation
Biodiversity
Ecosystem functioning
Nitrogen limitation
Fire Frequency
Plant Competition
MOSSES & LICHENS
MISCELLANEOUS LITTER
AGROPYRON REPENS
SCHIZACHYRIUM SCOPARIUM
PANICUM OLIGOSANTHES
PANICUM PERLONGUM
POA PRATENSIS
LESPEDEZA CAPITATA
AMBROSIA ARTEMISIIFOLIA ELATIOR
BERTEROA INCANA
MISCELLANEOUS HERBS
RUDBECKIA SEROTINA
PHYSALIS HETEROPHYLLA
AGROSTIS SCABRA
ACER NEGUNDO
ACHILLEA MILLEFOLIUM(LANULOSA)
ERIGERON CANADENSIS
ERIGERON STRIGOSUS
EUPHORBIA GLYPTOSPERMA
HEDEOMA HISPIDA
SILENE ANTIRRHINA
TRAGOPOGON DUBIUS (MAJOR)
ANEMONE CYLINDRICA
ARABIS SP
ASCLEPIAS SYRIACA
POLYGONUM CONVOLVULUS
LYCHNIS ALBA
FORB SEEDLINGS
FUNGI
CYPERUS SP
POTENTILLA RECTA
PRUNUS PENSYLVANICA
SETARIA LUTESCENS (GLAUCA)
PINUS STROBUS
ARABIS DIVARICARPA
CHENOPODIUM ALBUM
VERBASCUM THAPSUS
PANICUM PRAECOCIOUS
ARISTIDA BASIRAMEA
SOLIDAGO NEMORALIS
TRADESCANTIA OCCIDENTALIS
OENOTHERA BIENNIS
POLYGALA POLYGAMA
MISCELLANEOUS LEGUMES
SISYRINCHIUM CAMPESTRE
EQUISETUM LAEVIGATUM
SOLIDAGO RIGIDA
PHYSALIS VIRGINIANA
RUMEX ACETOSELLA
POLYGONUM TENUE
LEPIDIUM DENSIFLORUM
HIERACIUM LONGIPILUM
ANDROPOGON GERARDI
LIATRIS ASPERA
TRIFOLIUM SP
CAREX SP
GNAPHALIUM OBTUSIFOLIUM
ERAGROSTIS SPECTABILIS
LACTUCA SP
ROSA ARKANSANA
PRUNUS SP
RUBUS SP
AMBROSIA CORONOPIFOLIA
ARTEMISIA LUDOVICIANA
ASCLEPIAS TUBEROSA
ASTER AZUREUS
LITHOSPERMUM CAROLINIENSE
CAMPANULA ROTUNDIFOLIA
EUPHORBIA COROLLATA
SORGHASTRUM NUTANS
VIOLA PEDATIFIDA
OXYBAPHUS HIRSUTUS
LITHOSPERMUM CANESCENS
STIPA SPARTEA
LATHYRUS VENOSUS
HELIANTHEMUM BICKNELLII
PENSTEMON GRANDIFLORUS
ASTER ERICOIDES
SMILACINA RACEMOSA
ARTEMISIA (CAUDATA) CAMPESTRIS
PETALOSTEMUM PURPUREUM
DELPHINIUM VIRESCENS
RANUNCULUS RHOMBOIDEUS
HELIANTHUS LAETIFLORUS
CALAMAGROSTIS CANADENSIS
JUNCUS SP
STACHYS PALUSTRIS
RHUS GLABRA
SOLIDAGO GRAMINIFOLIA
MISCELLANEOUS GRASSES
CREPIS TECTORUM
QUERCUS BOREALIS-ELLIPSOIDALIS
COREOPSIS PALMATA
ASCLEPIAS SP
COMANDRA RICHARDSIANA
LEERSIA ORYZOIDES
HELIANTHUS GIGANTEUS
VIOLA SAGITTATA
VERONICASTRUM VIRGINICUM
POTENTILLA ARGUTA
VIOLA SP
ASTER SIMPLEX
QUERCUS MACROCARPA
spellingShingle Cedar Creek Natural History Area
Long Term
Ecology
Successional dynamics
Primary Productivity
Disturbance Patterns
Nutrient Budgets
Nutrient Cycles
Climatic Variation
Biodiversity
Ecosystem functioning
Nitrogen limitation
Fire Frequency
Plant Competition
MOSSES & LICHENS
MISCELLANEOUS LITTER
AGROPYRON REPENS
SCHIZACHYRIUM SCOPARIUM
PANICUM OLIGOSANTHES
PANICUM PERLONGUM
POA PRATENSIS
LESPEDEZA CAPITATA
AMBROSIA ARTEMISIIFOLIA ELATIOR
BERTEROA INCANA
MISCELLANEOUS HERBS
RUDBECKIA SEROTINA
PHYSALIS HETEROPHYLLA
AGROSTIS SCABRA
ACER NEGUNDO
ACHILLEA MILLEFOLIUM(LANULOSA)
ERIGERON CANADENSIS
ERIGERON STRIGOSUS
EUPHORBIA GLYPTOSPERMA
HEDEOMA HISPIDA
SILENE ANTIRRHINA
TRAGOPOGON DUBIUS (MAJOR)
ANEMONE CYLINDRICA
ARABIS SP
ASCLEPIAS SYRIACA
POLYGONUM CONVOLVULUS
LYCHNIS ALBA
FORB SEEDLINGS
FUNGI
CYPERUS SP
POTENTILLA RECTA
PRUNUS PENSYLVANICA
SETARIA LUTESCENS (GLAUCA)
PINUS STROBUS
ARABIS DIVARICARPA
CHENOPODIUM ALBUM
VERBASCUM THAPSUS
PANICUM PRAECOCIOUS
ARISTIDA BASIRAMEA
SOLIDAGO NEMORALIS
TRADESCANTIA OCCIDENTALIS
OENOTHERA BIENNIS
POLYGALA POLYGAMA
MISCELLANEOUS LEGUMES
SISYRINCHIUM CAMPESTRE
EQUISETUM LAEVIGATUM
SOLIDAGO RIGIDA
PHYSALIS VIRGINIANA
RUMEX ACETOSELLA
POLYGONUM TENUE
LEPIDIUM DENSIFLORUM
HIERACIUM LONGIPILUM
ANDROPOGON GERARDI
LIATRIS ASPERA
TRIFOLIUM SP
CAREX SP
GNAPHALIUM OBTUSIFOLIUM
ERAGROSTIS SPECTABILIS
LACTUCA SP
ROSA ARKANSANA
PRUNUS SP
RUBUS SP
AMBROSIA CORONOPIFOLIA
ARTEMISIA LUDOVICIANA
ASCLEPIAS TUBEROSA
ASTER AZUREUS
LITHOSPERMUM CAROLINIENSE
CAMPANULA ROTUNDIFOLIA
EUPHORBIA COROLLATA
SORGHASTRUM NUTANS
VIOLA PEDATIFIDA
OXYBAPHUS HIRSUTUS
LITHOSPERMUM CANESCENS
STIPA SPARTEA
LATHYRUS VENOSUS
HELIANTHEMUM BICKNELLII
PENSTEMON GRANDIFLORUS
ASTER ERICOIDES
SMILACINA RACEMOSA
ARTEMISIA (CAUDATA) CAMPESTRIS
PETALOSTEMUM PURPUREUM
DELPHINIUM VIRESCENS
RANUNCULUS RHOMBOIDEUS
HELIANTHUS LAETIFLORUS
CALAMAGROSTIS CANADENSIS
JUNCUS SP
STACHYS PALUSTRIS
RHUS GLABRA
SOLIDAGO GRAMINIFOLIA
MISCELLANEOUS GRASSES
CREPIS TECTORUM
QUERCUS BOREALIS-ELLIPSOIDALIS
COREOPSIS PALMATA
ASCLEPIAS SP
COMANDRA RICHARDSIANA
LEERSIA ORYZOIDES
HELIANTHUS GIGANTEUS
VIOLA SAGITTATA
VERONICASTRUM VIRGINICUM
POTENTILLA ARGUTA
VIOLA SP
ASTER SIMPLEX
QUERCUS MACROCARPA
Long-Term Nitrogen Deposition: Effects on Plant Diversity, Composition, Productivity and Stability. Year 1993 Aboveground biomass data
topic_facet Cedar Creek Natural History Area
Long Term
Ecology
Successional dynamics
Primary Productivity
Disturbance Patterns
Nutrient Budgets
Nutrient Cycles
Climatic Variation
Biodiversity
Ecosystem functioning
Nitrogen limitation
Fire Frequency
Plant Competition
MOSSES & LICHENS
MISCELLANEOUS LITTER
AGROPYRON REPENS
SCHIZACHYRIUM SCOPARIUM
PANICUM OLIGOSANTHES
PANICUM PERLONGUM
POA PRATENSIS
LESPEDEZA CAPITATA
AMBROSIA ARTEMISIIFOLIA ELATIOR
BERTEROA INCANA
MISCELLANEOUS HERBS
RUDBECKIA SEROTINA
PHYSALIS HETEROPHYLLA
AGROSTIS SCABRA
ACER NEGUNDO
ACHILLEA MILLEFOLIUM(LANULOSA)
ERIGERON CANADENSIS
ERIGERON STRIGOSUS
EUPHORBIA GLYPTOSPERMA
HEDEOMA HISPIDA
SILENE ANTIRRHINA
TRAGOPOGON DUBIUS (MAJOR)
ANEMONE CYLINDRICA
ARABIS SP
ASCLEPIAS SYRIACA
POLYGONUM CONVOLVULUS
LYCHNIS ALBA
FORB SEEDLINGS
FUNGI
CYPERUS SP
POTENTILLA RECTA
PRUNUS PENSYLVANICA
SETARIA LUTESCENS (GLAUCA)
PINUS STROBUS
ARABIS DIVARICARPA
CHENOPODIUM ALBUM
VERBASCUM THAPSUS
PANICUM PRAECOCIOUS
ARISTIDA BASIRAMEA
SOLIDAGO NEMORALIS
TRADESCANTIA OCCIDENTALIS
OENOTHERA BIENNIS
POLYGALA POLYGAMA
MISCELLANEOUS LEGUMES
SISYRINCHIUM CAMPESTRE
EQUISETUM LAEVIGATUM
SOLIDAGO RIGIDA
PHYSALIS VIRGINIANA
RUMEX ACETOSELLA
POLYGONUM TENUE
LEPIDIUM DENSIFLORUM
HIERACIUM LONGIPILUM
ANDROPOGON GERARDI
LIATRIS ASPERA
TRIFOLIUM SP
CAREX SP
GNAPHALIUM OBTUSIFOLIUM
ERAGROSTIS SPECTABILIS
LACTUCA SP
ROSA ARKANSANA
PRUNUS SP
RUBUS SP
AMBROSIA CORONOPIFOLIA
ARTEMISIA LUDOVICIANA
ASCLEPIAS TUBEROSA
ASTER AZUREUS
LITHOSPERMUM CAROLINIENSE
CAMPANULA ROTUNDIFOLIA
EUPHORBIA COROLLATA
SORGHASTRUM NUTANS
VIOLA PEDATIFIDA
OXYBAPHUS HIRSUTUS
LITHOSPERMUM CANESCENS
STIPA SPARTEA
LATHYRUS VENOSUS
HELIANTHEMUM BICKNELLII
PENSTEMON GRANDIFLORUS
ASTER ERICOIDES
SMILACINA RACEMOSA
ARTEMISIA (CAUDATA) CAMPESTRIS
PETALOSTEMUM PURPUREUM
DELPHINIUM VIRESCENS
RANUNCULUS RHOMBOIDEUS
HELIANTHUS LAETIFLORUS
CALAMAGROSTIS CANADENSIS
JUNCUS SP
STACHYS PALUSTRIS
RHUS GLABRA
SOLIDAGO GRAMINIFOLIA
MISCELLANEOUS GRASSES
CREPIS TECTORUM
QUERCUS BOREALIS-ELLIPSOIDALIS
COREOPSIS PALMATA
ASCLEPIAS SP
COMANDRA RICHARDSIANA
LEERSIA ORYZOIDES
HELIANTHUS GIGANTEUS
VIOLA SAGITTATA
VERONICASTRUM VIRGINICUM
POTENTILLA ARGUTA
VIOLA SP
ASTER SIMPLEX
QUERCUS MACROCARPA
description The purpose of this experiment is to measure how adding nitrogen over a long time will affect the number of species, the type of species present, the amount of annual growth, and the change from year to year in the growth of each species in a plant community which is also relieved of grazing by large and small mammals. The experiment is being conducted within fields (A, B, C, and D) which were initially low in soil nutrients. There are 8 different levels of nitrogen addition with other nutrients added to ensure that nitrogen remains the limiting nutrient, and a control which receives no nutrients. There are 6 replicates of the 9 treatments in fields A, B, and C and 5 replicates in field D. The treatments were randomly assigned to the plots. In fields A, B, and C the plots are in 6 by 9 grid and are 4 by 4 meters in size with 1 meter aisles between plots. In field D the plots are 1.5 by 4 meters and are placed in a 3 by 17 grid. The plots are enclosed by a fence to keep out mammalian herbivores. Gophers are trapped and removed as they appear. Nitrogen fertilizer (NH4NO3) is applied twice per year, once in early May and once in late June. This experiment was begun in 1982 by David Tilman.
format Dataset
title Long-Term Nitrogen Deposition: Effects on Plant Diversity, Composition, Productivity and Stability. Year 1993 Aboveground biomass data
title_short Long-Term Nitrogen Deposition: Effects on Plant Diversity, Composition, Productivity and Stability. Year 1993 Aboveground biomass data
title_full Long-Term Nitrogen Deposition: Effects on Plant Diversity, Composition, Productivity and Stability. Year 1993 Aboveground biomass data
title_fullStr Long-Term Nitrogen Deposition: Effects on Plant Diversity, Composition, Productivity and Stability. Year 1993 Aboveground biomass data
title_full_unstemmed Long-Term Nitrogen Deposition: Effects on Plant Diversity, Composition, Productivity and Stability. Year 1993 Aboveground biomass data
title_sort long-term nitrogen deposition: effects on plant diversity, composition, productivity and stability. year 1993 aboveground biomass data
publishDate 1995
url http://hdl.handle.net/10255/dryad.27365
http://metacat.lternet.edu/knb/metacat/knb-lter-cdr.799301.2/xml
op_coverage The Cedar Creek Natural History Area is located in Anoka and Isanti counties, approximately 30 miles north of Saint Paul, MN. CCNHA lies at the boundary between prairie and forest. It is a mosaic of uplands dominated by oak savanna, prairie, hardwood forest, pine forests,and abandoned agricultural fields and of lowlands comprised of ash and cedar swamps, acid bogs, marshes, and sedge meadows. Large tracts of the pre-agricultural ecosystems of the region are preserved within its boundaries, as is a successional chronosequence of more than 80 old fields of known history.
-93.22445 W -93.16289 E 45.44138 N 45.384865 S
1982 to 2006
1993
long_lat ENVELOPE(-129.954,-129.954,54.598,54.598)
ENVELOPE(62.500,62.500,-67.567,-67.567)
ENVELOPE(-60.515,-60.515,-62.932,-62.932)
ENVELOPE(-57.715,-57.715,51.467,51.467)
geographic Cedar Creek
Giganteus
Recta
Saint-Paul
geographic_facet Cedar Creek
Giganteus
Recta
Saint-Paul
genre Campanula rotundifolia
genre_facet Campanula rotundifolia
op_relation http://metacat.lternet.edu/knb/metacat/knb-lter-cdr.799301.2/xml
knb-lter-cdr.799301.2
http://hdl.handle.net/10255/dryad.27365
op_rights Code of Ethics and Rules for Use of Cedar Creek LTER and Related DataAs a condition for access to data provided by researchers of the Cedar Creek LTER, I, the data user, agrees to abide by the following code of ethics.I agree to notify the Cedar Creek LTER scientists who gathered data if I would like to use those data in any publication. I acknowledge that these data were gathered by Cedar Creek scientists because they had already perceived the importance of these data for a variety of scientific and societal issues. I will provide them with formal recognition that, at their discretion, may include co-authorship or acknowledgements on publications. I realize that the researchers who gathered these data may be using them for scientific analyses, papers or publications that are currently planned or in preparation, and that such activities have precedence over any that I might wish to prepare. In this case, my preparation of any work may be delayed, at the option of the Cedar Creek researchers involved, until their work is completed. Because it may be possible to misinterpret a data set if it is taken out of context, I will seek the assistance and opinion of those Cedar Creek researchers involved in the design of a study and the collection of the data as I analyze the data. Moreover, I realize that this computer data set is not complete, and it may contain errors. The complete data set includes extensive written documentation, which should be referenced to reduce the chance of errors in data and errors of interpretation.
_version_ 1766383857079156736
spelling ftdryad:oai:v1.datadryad.org:10255/dryad.27365 2023-05-15T15:48:45+02:00 Long-Term Nitrogen Deposition: Effects on Plant Diversity, Composition, Productivity and Stability. Year 1993 Aboveground biomass data The Cedar Creek Natural History Area is located in Anoka and Isanti counties, approximately 30 miles north of Saint Paul, MN. CCNHA lies at the boundary between prairie and forest. It is a mosaic of uplands dominated by oak savanna, prairie, hardwood forest, pine forests,and abandoned agricultural fields and of lowlands comprised of ash and cedar swamps, acid bogs, marshes, and sedge meadows. Large tracts of the pre-agricultural ecosystems of the region are preserved within its boundaries, as is a successional chronosequence of more than 80 old fields of known history. -93.22445 W -93.16289 E 45.44138 N 45.384865 S 1982 to 2006 1993 1995 text/plain http://hdl.handle.net/10255/dryad.27365 http://metacat.lternet.edu/knb/metacat/knb-lter-cdr.799301.2/xml unknown http://metacat.lternet.edu/knb/metacat/knb-lter-cdr.799301.2/xml knb-lter-cdr.799301.2 http://hdl.handle.net/10255/dryad.27365 Code of Ethics and Rules for Use of Cedar Creek LTER and Related DataAs a condition for access to data provided by researchers of the Cedar Creek LTER, I, the data user, agrees to abide by the following code of ethics.I agree to notify the Cedar Creek LTER scientists who gathered data if I would like to use those data in any publication. I acknowledge that these data were gathered by Cedar Creek scientists because they had already perceived the importance of these data for a variety of scientific and societal issues. I will provide them with formal recognition that, at their discretion, may include co-authorship or acknowledgements on publications. I realize that the researchers who gathered these data may be using them for scientific analyses, papers or publications that are currently planned or in preparation, and that such activities have precedence over any that I might wish to prepare. In this case, my preparation of any work may be delayed, at the option of the Cedar Creek researchers involved, until their work is completed. Because it may be possible to misinterpret a data set if it is taken out of context, I will seek the assistance and opinion of those Cedar Creek researchers involved in the design of a study and the collection of the data as I analyze the data. Moreover, I realize that this computer data set is not complete, and it may contain errors. The complete data set includes extensive written documentation, which should be referenced to reduce the chance of errors in data and errors of interpretation. Cedar Creek Natural History Area Long Term Ecology Successional dynamics Primary Productivity Disturbance Patterns Nutrient Budgets Nutrient Cycles Climatic Variation Biodiversity Ecosystem functioning Nitrogen limitation Fire Frequency Plant Competition MOSSES & LICHENS MISCELLANEOUS LITTER AGROPYRON REPENS SCHIZACHYRIUM SCOPARIUM PANICUM OLIGOSANTHES PANICUM PERLONGUM POA PRATENSIS LESPEDEZA CAPITATA AMBROSIA ARTEMISIIFOLIA ELATIOR BERTEROA INCANA MISCELLANEOUS HERBS RUDBECKIA SEROTINA PHYSALIS HETEROPHYLLA AGROSTIS SCABRA ACER NEGUNDO ACHILLEA MILLEFOLIUM(LANULOSA) ERIGERON CANADENSIS ERIGERON STRIGOSUS EUPHORBIA GLYPTOSPERMA HEDEOMA HISPIDA SILENE ANTIRRHINA TRAGOPOGON DUBIUS (MAJOR) ANEMONE CYLINDRICA ARABIS SP ASCLEPIAS SYRIACA POLYGONUM CONVOLVULUS LYCHNIS ALBA FORB SEEDLINGS FUNGI CYPERUS SP POTENTILLA RECTA PRUNUS PENSYLVANICA SETARIA LUTESCENS (GLAUCA) PINUS STROBUS ARABIS DIVARICARPA CHENOPODIUM ALBUM VERBASCUM THAPSUS PANICUM PRAECOCIOUS ARISTIDA BASIRAMEA SOLIDAGO NEMORALIS TRADESCANTIA OCCIDENTALIS OENOTHERA BIENNIS POLYGALA POLYGAMA MISCELLANEOUS LEGUMES SISYRINCHIUM CAMPESTRE EQUISETUM LAEVIGATUM SOLIDAGO RIGIDA PHYSALIS VIRGINIANA RUMEX ACETOSELLA POLYGONUM TENUE LEPIDIUM DENSIFLORUM HIERACIUM LONGIPILUM ANDROPOGON GERARDI LIATRIS ASPERA TRIFOLIUM SP CAREX SP GNAPHALIUM OBTUSIFOLIUM ERAGROSTIS SPECTABILIS LACTUCA SP ROSA ARKANSANA PRUNUS SP RUBUS SP AMBROSIA CORONOPIFOLIA ARTEMISIA LUDOVICIANA ASCLEPIAS TUBEROSA ASTER AZUREUS LITHOSPERMUM CAROLINIENSE CAMPANULA ROTUNDIFOLIA EUPHORBIA COROLLATA SORGHASTRUM NUTANS VIOLA PEDATIFIDA OXYBAPHUS HIRSUTUS LITHOSPERMUM CANESCENS STIPA SPARTEA LATHYRUS VENOSUS HELIANTHEMUM BICKNELLII PENSTEMON GRANDIFLORUS ASTER ERICOIDES SMILACINA RACEMOSA ARTEMISIA (CAUDATA) CAMPESTRIS PETALOSTEMUM PURPUREUM DELPHINIUM VIRESCENS RANUNCULUS RHOMBOIDEUS HELIANTHUS LAETIFLORUS CALAMAGROSTIS CANADENSIS JUNCUS SP STACHYS PALUSTRIS RHUS GLABRA SOLIDAGO GRAMINIFOLIA MISCELLANEOUS GRASSES CREPIS TECTORUM QUERCUS BOREALIS-ELLIPSOIDALIS COREOPSIS PALMATA ASCLEPIAS SP COMANDRA RICHARDSIANA LEERSIA ORYZOIDES HELIANTHUS GIGANTEUS VIOLA SAGITTATA VERONICASTRUM VIRGINICUM POTENTILLA ARGUTA VIOLA SP ASTER SIMPLEX QUERCUS MACROCARPA dataset 1995 ftdryad 2020-01-01T14:49:33Z The purpose of this experiment is to measure how adding nitrogen over a long time will affect the number of species, the type of species present, the amount of annual growth, and the change from year to year in the growth of each species in a plant community which is also relieved of grazing by large and small mammals. The experiment is being conducted within fields (A, B, C, and D) which were initially low in soil nutrients. There are 8 different levels of nitrogen addition with other nutrients added to ensure that nitrogen remains the limiting nutrient, and a control which receives no nutrients. There are 6 replicates of the 9 treatments in fields A, B, and C and 5 replicates in field D. The treatments were randomly assigned to the plots. In fields A, B, and C the plots are in 6 by 9 grid and are 4 by 4 meters in size with 1 meter aisles between plots. In field D the plots are 1.5 by 4 meters and are placed in a 3 by 17 grid. The plots are enclosed by a fence to keep out mammalian herbivores. Gophers are trapped and removed as they appear. Nitrogen fertilizer (NH4NO3) is applied twice per year, once in early May and once in late June. This experiment was begun in 1982 by David Tilman. Dataset Campanula rotundifolia Dryad Digital Repository (Duke University) Cedar Creek ENVELOPE(-129.954,-129.954,54.598,54.598) Giganteus ENVELOPE(62.500,62.500,-67.567,-67.567) Recta ENVELOPE(-60.515,-60.515,-62.932,-62.932) Saint-Paul ENVELOPE(-57.715,-57.715,51.467,51.467)