Ecosystem recovery following cessation of N addition . Year 1992 Raw data by plant species
This experiment was established on top of E002 in fields A and C. In the spring of 1992, 3 randomly chosen replicates of each nutrient treatment of experiment E002 were chosen to receive no more fertilizer. For a description of these plots, see E002 . For a description of fertilizer added to E097, s...
| Format: | Dataset |
|---|---|
| Language: | unknown |
| Published: |
1994
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/10255/dryad.24939 http://metacat.lternet.edu/knb/metacat/knb-lter-cdr.959297.2/xml |
| id |
ftdryad:oai:v1.datadryad.org:10255/dryad.24939 |
|---|---|
| record_format |
openpolar |
| institution |
Open Polar |
| collection |
Dryad Digital Repository (Duke University) |
| op_collection_id |
ftdryad |
| language |
unknown |
| topic |
Cedar Creek Natural History Area Long Term Ecology Successional dynamics Primary Productivity Disturbance Patterns Nutrient Budgets Nutrient Cycles Climatic Variation Biodiversity Ecosystem functioning Nitrogen limitation Fire Frequency Plant Competition MISCELLANEOUS LITTER AGROPYRON REPENS POA PRATENSIS MELILOTUS SP PHYSALIS HETEROPHYLLA MOSSES & LICHENS SCHIZACHYRIUM SCOPARIUM ANTENNARIA NEGLECTA ERIGERON CANADENSIS HEDEOMA HISPIDA POLYGONUM CONVOLVULUS SILENE ANTIRRHINA VERBASCUM THAPSUS POTENTILLA RECTA AMBROSIA ARTEMISIIFOLIA ELATIOR BERTEROA INCANA ERIGERON STRIGOSUS PHYSALIS VIRGINIANA TRADESCANTIA OCCIDENTALIS PANICUM OLIGOSANTHES SETARIA LUTESCENS (GLAUCA) ARISTIDA BASIRAMEA ACHILLEA MILLEFOLIUM(LANULOSA) MISCELLANEOUS HERBS CHENOPODIUM ALBUM CYPERUS SP TRAGOPOGON DUBIUS (MAJOR) ASCLEPIAS SYRIACA POLYGALA POLYGAMA EQUISETUM LAEVIGATUM CAREX SP EUPHORBIA COROLLATA AMBROSIA CORONOPIFOLIA ROSA ARKANSANA ARTEMISIA LUDOVICIANA SOLIDAGO NEMORALIS OXYBAPHUS HIRSUTUS RUBUS SP LYCHNIS ALBA SORGHASTRUM NUTANS STIPA SPARTEA HELIANTHEMUM BICKNELLII RUDBECKIA SEROTINA SOLIDAGO RIGIDA ERAGROSTIS SPECTABILIS LITHOSPERMUM CANESCENS VIOLA PEDATIFIDA LITHOSPERMUM CAROLINIENSE LATHYRUS VENOSUS URTICA DIOICA CAMPANULA ROTUNDIFOLIA ASTER AZUREUS PANICUM PERLONGUM LACTUCA CANADENSIS MISCELLANEOUS GRASSES ANEMONE CYLINDRICA ANDROPOGON GERARDI VICIA VILLOSA OENOTHERA BIENNIS |
| spellingShingle |
Cedar Creek Natural History Area Long Term Ecology Successional dynamics Primary Productivity Disturbance Patterns Nutrient Budgets Nutrient Cycles Climatic Variation Biodiversity Ecosystem functioning Nitrogen limitation Fire Frequency Plant Competition MISCELLANEOUS LITTER AGROPYRON REPENS POA PRATENSIS MELILOTUS SP PHYSALIS HETEROPHYLLA MOSSES & LICHENS SCHIZACHYRIUM SCOPARIUM ANTENNARIA NEGLECTA ERIGERON CANADENSIS HEDEOMA HISPIDA POLYGONUM CONVOLVULUS SILENE ANTIRRHINA VERBASCUM THAPSUS POTENTILLA RECTA AMBROSIA ARTEMISIIFOLIA ELATIOR BERTEROA INCANA ERIGERON STRIGOSUS PHYSALIS VIRGINIANA TRADESCANTIA OCCIDENTALIS PANICUM OLIGOSANTHES SETARIA LUTESCENS (GLAUCA) ARISTIDA BASIRAMEA ACHILLEA MILLEFOLIUM(LANULOSA) MISCELLANEOUS HERBS CHENOPODIUM ALBUM CYPERUS SP TRAGOPOGON DUBIUS (MAJOR) ASCLEPIAS SYRIACA POLYGALA POLYGAMA EQUISETUM LAEVIGATUM CAREX SP EUPHORBIA COROLLATA AMBROSIA CORONOPIFOLIA ROSA ARKANSANA ARTEMISIA LUDOVICIANA SOLIDAGO NEMORALIS OXYBAPHUS HIRSUTUS RUBUS SP LYCHNIS ALBA SORGHASTRUM NUTANS STIPA SPARTEA HELIANTHEMUM BICKNELLII RUDBECKIA SEROTINA SOLIDAGO RIGIDA ERAGROSTIS SPECTABILIS LITHOSPERMUM CANESCENS VIOLA PEDATIFIDA LITHOSPERMUM CAROLINIENSE LATHYRUS VENOSUS URTICA DIOICA CAMPANULA ROTUNDIFOLIA ASTER AZUREUS PANICUM PERLONGUM LACTUCA CANADENSIS MISCELLANEOUS GRASSES ANEMONE CYLINDRICA ANDROPOGON GERARDI VICIA VILLOSA OENOTHERA BIENNIS Ecosystem recovery following cessation of N addition . Year 1992 Raw data by plant species |
| topic_facet |
Cedar Creek Natural History Area Long Term Ecology Successional dynamics Primary Productivity Disturbance Patterns Nutrient Budgets Nutrient Cycles Climatic Variation Biodiversity Ecosystem functioning Nitrogen limitation Fire Frequency Plant Competition MISCELLANEOUS LITTER AGROPYRON REPENS POA PRATENSIS MELILOTUS SP PHYSALIS HETEROPHYLLA MOSSES & LICHENS SCHIZACHYRIUM SCOPARIUM ANTENNARIA NEGLECTA ERIGERON CANADENSIS HEDEOMA HISPIDA POLYGONUM CONVOLVULUS SILENE ANTIRRHINA VERBASCUM THAPSUS POTENTILLA RECTA AMBROSIA ARTEMISIIFOLIA ELATIOR BERTEROA INCANA ERIGERON STRIGOSUS PHYSALIS VIRGINIANA TRADESCANTIA OCCIDENTALIS PANICUM OLIGOSANTHES SETARIA LUTESCENS (GLAUCA) ARISTIDA BASIRAMEA ACHILLEA MILLEFOLIUM(LANULOSA) MISCELLANEOUS HERBS CHENOPODIUM ALBUM CYPERUS SP TRAGOPOGON DUBIUS (MAJOR) ASCLEPIAS SYRIACA POLYGALA POLYGAMA EQUISETUM LAEVIGATUM CAREX SP EUPHORBIA COROLLATA AMBROSIA CORONOPIFOLIA ROSA ARKANSANA ARTEMISIA LUDOVICIANA SOLIDAGO NEMORALIS OXYBAPHUS HIRSUTUS RUBUS SP LYCHNIS ALBA SORGHASTRUM NUTANS STIPA SPARTEA HELIANTHEMUM BICKNELLII RUDBECKIA SEROTINA SOLIDAGO RIGIDA ERAGROSTIS SPECTABILIS LITHOSPERMUM CANESCENS VIOLA PEDATIFIDA LITHOSPERMUM CAROLINIENSE LATHYRUS VENOSUS URTICA DIOICA CAMPANULA ROTUNDIFOLIA ASTER AZUREUS PANICUM PERLONGUM LACTUCA CANADENSIS MISCELLANEOUS GRASSES ANEMONE CYLINDRICA ANDROPOGON GERARDI VICIA VILLOSA OENOTHERA BIENNIS |
| description |
This experiment was established on top of E002 in fields A and C. In the spring of 1992, 3 randomly chosen replicates of each nutrient treatment of experiment E002 were chosen to receive no more fertilizer. For a description of these plots, see E002 . For a description of fertilizer added to E097, see file fertilization details . For a list of treatments, see the treatment layouts in file trmte97 . |
| format |
Dataset |
| title |
Ecosystem recovery following cessation of N addition . Year 1992 Raw data by plant species |
| title_short |
Ecosystem recovery following cessation of N addition . Year 1992 Raw data by plant species |
| title_full |
Ecosystem recovery following cessation of N addition . Year 1992 Raw data by plant species |
| title_fullStr |
Ecosystem recovery following cessation of N addition . Year 1992 Raw data by plant species |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Ecosystem recovery following cessation of N addition . Year 1992 Raw data by plant species |
| title_sort |
ecosystem recovery following cessation of n addition . year 1992 raw data by plant species |
| publishDate |
1994 |
| url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10255/dryad.24939 http://metacat.lternet.edu/knb/metacat/knb-lter-cdr.959297.2/xml |
| op_coverage |
The Cedar Creek Natural History Area is located in Anoka and Isanti counties, approximately 30 miles north of Saint Paul, MN. CCNHA lies at the boundary between prairie and forest. It is a mosaic of uplands dominated by oak savanna, prairie, hardwood forest, pine forests,and abandoned agricultural fields and of lowlands comprised of ash and cedar swamps, acid bogs, marshes, and sedge meadows. Large tracts of the pre-agricultural ecosystems of the region are preserved within its boundaries, as is a successional chronosequence of more than 80 old fields of known history. -93.22445 W -93.16289 E 45.44138 N 45.384865 S 1992 to 2006 1992 |
| long_lat |
ENVELOPE(-57.715,-57.715,51.467,51.467) ENVELOPE(-60.515,-60.515,-62.932,-62.932) ENVELOPE(-129.954,-129.954,54.598,54.598) |
| geographic |
Saint-Paul Recta Cedar Creek |
| geographic_facet |
Saint-Paul Recta Cedar Creek |
| genre |
Campanula rotundifolia |
| genre_facet |
Campanula rotundifolia |
| op_relation |
http://metacat.lternet.edu/knb/metacat/knb-lter-cdr.959297.2/xml knb-lter-cdr.959297.2 http://hdl.handle.net/10255/dryad.24939 |
| op_rights |
Code of Ethics and Rules for Use of Cedar Creek LTER and Related DataAs a condition for access to data provided by researchers of the Cedar Creek LTER, I, the data user, agrees to abide by the following code of ethics.I agree to notify the Cedar Creek LTER scientists who gathered data if I would like to use those data in any publication. I acknowledge that these data were gathered by Cedar Creek scientists because they had already perceived the importance of these data for a variety of scientific and societal issues. I will provide them with formal recognition that, at their discretion, may include co-authorship or acknowledgements on publications. I realize that the researchers who gathered these data may be using them for scientific analyses, papers or publications that are currently planned or in preparation, and that such activities have precedence over any that I might wish to prepare. In this case, my preparation of any work may be delayed, at the option of the Cedar Creek researchers involved, until their work is completed. Because it may be possible to misinterpret a data set if it is taken out of context, I will seek the assistance and opinion of those Cedar Creek researchers involved in the design of a study and the collection of the data as I analyze the data. Moreover, I realize that this computer data set is not complete, and it may contain errors. The complete data set includes extensive written documentation, which should be referenced to reduce the chance of errors in data and errors of interpretation. |
| _version_ |
1766383841221541888 |
| spelling |
ftdryad:oai:v1.datadryad.org:10255/dryad.24939 2023-05-15T15:48:44+02:00 Ecosystem recovery following cessation of N addition . Year 1992 Raw data by plant species The Cedar Creek Natural History Area is located in Anoka and Isanti counties, approximately 30 miles north of Saint Paul, MN. CCNHA lies at the boundary between prairie and forest. It is a mosaic of uplands dominated by oak savanna, prairie, hardwood forest, pine forests,and abandoned agricultural fields and of lowlands comprised of ash and cedar swamps, acid bogs, marshes, and sedge meadows. Large tracts of the pre-agricultural ecosystems of the region are preserved within its boundaries, as is a successional chronosequence of more than 80 old fields of known history. -93.22445 W -93.16289 E 45.44138 N 45.384865 S 1992 to 2006 1992 1994 text/plain http://hdl.handle.net/10255/dryad.24939 http://metacat.lternet.edu/knb/metacat/knb-lter-cdr.959297.2/xml unknown http://metacat.lternet.edu/knb/metacat/knb-lter-cdr.959297.2/xml knb-lter-cdr.959297.2 http://hdl.handle.net/10255/dryad.24939 Code of Ethics and Rules for Use of Cedar Creek LTER and Related DataAs a condition for access to data provided by researchers of the Cedar Creek LTER, I, the data user, agrees to abide by the following code of ethics.I agree to notify the Cedar Creek LTER scientists who gathered data if I would like to use those data in any publication. I acknowledge that these data were gathered by Cedar Creek scientists because they had already perceived the importance of these data for a variety of scientific and societal issues. I will provide them with formal recognition that, at their discretion, may include co-authorship or acknowledgements on publications. I realize that the researchers who gathered these data may be using them for scientific analyses, papers or publications that are currently planned or in preparation, and that such activities have precedence over any that I might wish to prepare. In this case, my preparation of any work may be delayed, at the option of the Cedar Creek researchers involved, until their work is completed. Because it may be possible to misinterpret a data set if it is taken out of context, I will seek the assistance and opinion of those Cedar Creek researchers involved in the design of a study and the collection of the data as I analyze the data. Moreover, I realize that this computer data set is not complete, and it may contain errors. The complete data set includes extensive written documentation, which should be referenced to reduce the chance of errors in data and errors of interpretation. Cedar Creek Natural History Area Long Term Ecology Successional dynamics Primary Productivity Disturbance Patterns Nutrient Budgets Nutrient Cycles Climatic Variation Biodiversity Ecosystem functioning Nitrogen limitation Fire Frequency Plant Competition MISCELLANEOUS LITTER AGROPYRON REPENS POA PRATENSIS MELILOTUS SP PHYSALIS HETEROPHYLLA MOSSES & LICHENS SCHIZACHYRIUM SCOPARIUM ANTENNARIA NEGLECTA ERIGERON CANADENSIS HEDEOMA HISPIDA POLYGONUM CONVOLVULUS SILENE ANTIRRHINA VERBASCUM THAPSUS POTENTILLA RECTA AMBROSIA ARTEMISIIFOLIA ELATIOR BERTEROA INCANA ERIGERON STRIGOSUS PHYSALIS VIRGINIANA TRADESCANTIA OCCIDENTALIS PANICUM OLIGOSANTHES SETARIA LUTESCENS (GLAUCA) ARISTIDA BASIRAMEA ACHILLEA MILLEFOLIUM(LANULOSA) MISCELLANEOUS HERBS CHENOPODIUM ALBUM CYPERUS SP TRAGOPOGON DUBIUS (MAJOR) ASCLEPIAS SYRIACA POLYGALA POLYGAMA EQUISETUM LAEVIGATUM CAREX SP EUPHORBIA COROLLATA AMBROSIA CORONOPIFOLIA ROSA ARKANSANA ARTEMISIA LUDOVICIANA SOLIDAGO NEMORALIS OXYBAPHUS HIRSUTUS RUBUS SP LYCHNIS ALBA SORGHASTRUM NUTANS STIPA SPARTEA HELIANTHEMUM BICKNELLII RUDBECKIA SEROTINA SOLIDAGO RIGIDA ERAGROSTIS SPECTABILIS LITHOSPERMUM CANESCENS VIOLA PEDATIFIDA LITHOSPERMUM CAROLINIENSE LATHYRUS VENOSUS URTICA DIOICA CAMPANULA ROTUNDIFOLIA ASTER AZUREUS PANICUM PERLONGUM LACTUCA CANADENSIS MISCELLANEOUS GRASSES ANEMONE CYLINDRICA ANDROPOGON GERARDI VICIA VILLOSA OENOTHERA BIENNIS dataset 1994 ftdryad 2020-01-01T14:47:53Z This experiment was established on top of E002 in fields A and C. In the spring of 1992, 3 randomly chosen replicates of each nutrient treatment of experiment E002 were chosen to receive no more fertilizer. For a description of these plots, see E002 . For a description of fertilizer added to E097, see file fertilization details . For a list of treatments, see the treatment layouts in file trmte97 . Dataset Campanula rotundifolia Dryad Digital Repository (Duke University) Saint-Paul ENVELOPE(-57.715,-57.715,51.467,51.467) Recta ENVELOPE(-60.515,-60.515,-62.932,-62.932) Cedar Creek ENVELOPE(-129.954,-129.954,54.598,54.598) |