Effects of various nutrients on vegetation . Year 1991 Raw data by plant species
This experiment was conducted within the fenced areas of fields A, B, C, and D. The purpose of this experiment was to determine the effect of various nutrients on vegetation. There were eight different nutrients and a control. The different nutrients were N, P, K, Ca, Mg, Na, H2O, and a combination...
| Format: | Dataset |
|---|---|
| Language: | unknown |
| Published: |
1993
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/10255/dryad.24001 http://metacat.lternet.edu/knb/metacat/knb-lter-cdr.959103.2/xml |
| id |
ftdryad:oai:v1.datadryad.org:10255/dryad.24001 |
|---|---|
| record_format |
openpolar |
| institution |
Open Polar |
| collection |
Dryad Digital Repository (Duke University) |
| op_collection_id |
ftdryad |
| language |
unknown |
| topic |
Cedar Creek Natural History Area Long Term Ecology Successional dynamics Primary Productivity Disturbance Patterns Nutrient Budgets Nutrient Cycles Climatic Variation Biodiversity Ecosystem functioning Nitrogen limitation Fire Frequency Plant Competition MOSSES LICHENS MISCELLANEOUS LITTER AGROPYRON REPENS POA PRATENSIS SETARIA LUTESCENS GLAUCA EUPHORBIA GLYPTOSPERMA PHYSALIS HETEROPHYLLA ARISTIDA BASIRAMEA CREPIS TECTORUM ERIGERON CANADENSIS ARABIS DIVARICARPA CENCHRUS LONGISPINUS LESPEDEZA CAPITATA SCHIZACHYRIUM SCOPARIUM ACHILLEA MILLEFOLIUM LANULOSA AMBROSIA ARTEMISIIFOLIA ELATIO ANEMONE CYLINDRICA BERTEROA INCANA HEDEOMA HISPIDA LYCHNIS ALBA POTENTILLA RECTA SILENE ANTIRRHINA MISC. HERBS PANICUM OLIGOSANTHES ERIGERON STRIGOSUS POLYGONUM CONVOLVULUS TRADESCANTIA OCCIDENTALIS DIGITARIA ISCHAEMUM GNAPHALIUM OBTUSIFOLIUM POLYGONUM TENUE HIERACIUM LONGIPILUM OENOTHERA BIENNIS ASCLEPIAS SYRIACA FRAGARIA VIRGINIANA ERAGROSTIS SPECTABILIS ARTEMISIA CAUDATA LEPIDIUM DENSIFLORUM TRAGOPOGON DUBIUS MAJOR EUPHORBIA SUPINA MOLLUGO VERTICILLATA AGROSTIS SCABRA CYPERUS SP POLYGALA POLYGAMA RUMEX ACETOSELLA LITHOSPERMUM CAROLINENSE VERBASCUM THAPSUS SOLIDAGO NEMORALIS ANDROPOGON GERARDI PINUS STROBUS LACTUCA CANADENSIS LACTUCA SP LIATRIS ASPERA PANICUM CAPILLARE CHENOPODIUM LEPTOPHYLLUM DESMODIUM CANADENSE SOLIDAGO RIGIDA FUNGI PANICUM PERLONGUM SORGHASTRUM NUTANS ROSA ARKANSANA SISYRINCHIUM CAMPESTRE OXYBAPHUS HIRSUTUS EUPHORBIA COROLLATA PANICUM PRAECOCIOUS AMBROSIA CORONOPIFOLIA ARTEMISIA LUDOVICIANA ASTER AZUREUS EQUISETUM LAEVIGATUM CAREX SP LATHYRUS VENOSUS LITHOSPERMUM CANESCENS CAMPANULA ROTUNDIFOLIA PHYSALIS VIRGINIANA VIOLA PEDATIFIDA MONARDA FISTULOSA RUDBECKIA SEROTINA CHENOPODIUM ALBA CALAMOVILFA LONGIFOLIA AMORPHA CANESCENS ASCLEPIAS TUBEROSA PANICUM VIRGATUM SPOROBOLUS CRYPTANDRIS STIPA SPARTEA HELIANTHUS LAETIFLORUS RHUS GLABRA RANUNCULUS RHOMBOIDEUS COMMANDRA RICHARDSIANA DELPHINIUM VIRESCENS |
| spellingShingle |
Cedar Creek Natural History Area Long Term Ecology Successional dynamics Primary Productivity Disturbance Patterns Nutrient Budgets Nutrient Cycles Climatic Variation Biodiversity Ecosystem functioning Nitrogen limitation Fire Frequency Plant Competition MOSSES LICHENS MISCELLANEOUS LITTER AGROPYRON REPENS POA PRATENSIS SETARIA LUTESCENS GLAUCA EUPHORBIA GLYPTOSPERMA PHYSALIS HETEROPHYLLA ARISTIDA BASIRAMEA CREPIS TECTORUM ERIGERON CANADENSIS ARABIS DIVARICARPA CENCHRUS LONGISPINUS LESPEDEZA CAPITATA SCHIZACHYRIUM SCOPARIUM ACHILLEA MILLEFOLIUM LANULOSA AMBROSIA ARTEMISIIFOLIA ELATIO ANEMONE CYLINDRICA BERTEROA INCANA HEDEOMA HISPIDA LYCHNIS ALBA POTENTILLA RECTA SILENE ANTIRRHINA MISC. HERBS PANICUM OLIGOSANTHES ERIGERON STRIGOSUS POLYGONUM CONVOLVULUS TRADESCANTIA OCCIDENTALIS DIGITARIA ISCHAEMUM GNAPHALIUM OBTUSIFOLIUM POLYGONUM TENUE HIERACIUM LONGIPILUM OENOTHERA BIENNIS ASCLEPIAS SYRIACA FRAGARIA VIRGINIANA ERAGROSTIS SPECTABILIS ARTEMISIA CAUDATA LEPIDIUM DENSIFLORUM TRAGOPOGON DUBIUS MAJOR EUPHORBIA SUPINA MOLLUGO VERTICILLATA AGROSTIS SCABRA CYPERUS SP POLYGALA POLYGAMA RUMEX ACETOSELLA LITHOSPERMUM CAROLINENSE VERBASCUM THAPSUS SOLIDAGO NEMORALIS ANDROPOGON GERARDI PINUS STROBUS LACTUCA CANADENSIS LACTUCA SP LIATRIS ASPERA PANICUM CAPILLARE CHENOPODIUM LEPTOPHYLLUM DESMODIUM CANADENSE SOLIDAGO RIGIDA FUNGI PANICUM PERLONGUM SORGHASTRUM NUTANS ROSA ARKANSANA SISYRINCHIUM CAMPESTRE OXYBAPHUS HIRSUTUS EUPHORBIA COROLLATA PANICUM PRAECOCIOUS AMBROSIA CORONOPIFOLIA ARTEMISIA LUDOVICIANA ASTER AZUREUS EQUISETUM LAEVIGATUM CAREX SP LATHYRUS VENOSUS LITHOSPERMUM CANESCENS CAMPANULA ROTUNDIFOLIA PHYSALIS VIRGINIANA VIOLA PEDATIFIDA MONARDA FISTULOSA RUDBECKIA SEROTINA CHENOPODIUM ALBA CALAMOVILFA LONGIFOLIA AMORPHA CANESCENS ASCLEPIAS TUBEROSA PANICUM VIRGATUM SPOROBOLUS CRYPTANDRIS STIPA SPARTEA HELIANTHUS LAETIFLORUS RHUS GLABRA RANUNCULUS RHOMBOIDEUS COMMANDRA RICHARDSIANA DELPHINIUM VIRESCENS Effects of various nutrients on vegetation . Year 1991 Raw data by plant species |
| topic_facet |
Cedar Creek Natural History Area Long Term Ecology Successional dynamics Primary Productivity Disturbance Patterns Nutrient Budgets Nutrient Cycles Climatic Variation Biodiversity Ecosystem functioning Nitrogen limitation Fire Frequency Plant Competition MOSSES LICHENS MISCELLANEOUS LITTER AGROPYRON REPENS POA PRATENSIS SETARIA LUTESCENS GLAUCA EUPHORBIA GLYPTOSPERMA PHYSALIS HETEROPHYLLA ARISTIDA BASIRAMEA CREPIS TECTORUM ERIGERON CANADENSIS ARABIS DIVARICARPA CENCHRUS LONGISPINUS LESPEDEZA CAPITATA SCHIZACHYRIUM SCOPARIUM ACHILLEA MILLEFOLIUM LANULOSA AMBROSIA ARTEMISIIFOLIA ELATIO ANEMONE CYLINDRICA BERTEROA INCANA HEDEOMA HISPIDA LYCHNIS ALBA POTENTILLA RECTA SILENE ANTIRRHINA MISC. HERBS PANICUM OLIGOSANTHES ERIGERON STRIGOSUS POLYGONUM CONVOLVULUS TRADESCANTIA OCCIDENTALIS DIGITARIA ISCHAEMUM GNAPHALIUM OBTUSIFOLIUM POLYGONUM TENUE HIERACIUM LONGIPILUM OENOTHERA BIENNIS ASCLEPIAS SYRIACA FRAGARIA VIRGINIANA ERAGROSTIS SPECTABILIS ARTEMISIA CAUDATA LEPIDIUM DENSIFLORUM TRAGOPOGON DUBIUS MAJOR EUPHORBIA SUPINA MOLLUGO VERTICILLATA AGROSTIS SCABRA CYPERUS SP POLYGALA POLYGAMA RUMEX ACETOSELLA LITHOSPERMUM CAROLINENSE VERBASCUM THAPSUS SOLIDAGO NEMORALIS ANDROPOGON GERARDI PINUS STROBUS LACTUCA CANADENSIS LACTUCA SP LIATRIS ASPERA PANICUM CAPILLARE CHENOPODIUM LEPTOPHYLLUM DESMODIUM CANADENSE SOLIDAGO RIGIDA FUNGI PANICUM PERLONGUM SORGHASTRUM NUTANS ROSA ARKANSANA SISYRINCHIUM CAMPESTRE OXYBAPHUS HIRSUTUS EUPHORBIA COROLLATA PANICUM PRAECOCIOUS AMBROSIA CORONOPIFOLIA ARTEMISIA LUDOVICIANA ASTER AZUREUS EQUISETUM LAEVIGATUM CAREX SP LATHYRUS VENOSUS LITHOSPERMUM CANESCENS CAMPANULA ROTUNDIFOLIA PHYSALIS VIRGINIANA VIOLA PEDATIFIDA MONARDA FISTULOSA RUDBECKIA SEROTINA CHENOPODIUM ALBA CALAMOVILFA LONGIFOLIA AMORPHA CANESCENS ASCLEPIAS TUBEROSA PANICUM VIRGATUM SPOROBOLUS CRYPTANDRIS STIPA SPARTEA HELIANTHUS LAETIFLORUS RHUS GLABRA RANUNCULUS RHOMBOIDEUS COMMANDRA RICHARDSIANA DELPHINIUM VIRESCENS |
| description |
This experiment was conducted within the fenced areas of fields A, B, C, and D. The purpose of this experiment was to determine the effect of various nutrients on vegetation. There were eight different nutrients and a control. The different nutrients were N, P, K, Ca, Mg, Na, H2O, and a combination of trace metals. For details see nutrient details . There were 36 plots in each field, 4 replicates of the 9 treatment levels. The plots were 1 meter by 4 meters and were laid out in a 4 by 9 grid. The grid was divided into 4 quarters and treatments were assigned with a randomized block design. |
| format |
Dataset |
| title |
Effects of various nutrients on vegetation . Year 1991 Raw data by plant species |
| title_short |
Effects of various nutrients on vegetation . Year 1991 Raw data by plant species |
| title_full |
Effects of various nutrients on vegetation . Year 1991 Raw data by plant species |
| title_fullStr |
Effects of various nutrients on vegetation . Year 1991 Raw data by plant species |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Effects of various nutrients on vegetation . Year 1991 Raw data by plant species |
| title_sort |
effects of various nutrients on vegetation . year 1991 raw data by plant species |
| publishDate |
1993 |
| url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10255/dryad.24001 http://metacat.lternet.edu/knb/metacat/knb-lter-cdr.959103.2/xml |
| op_coverage |
The Cedar Creek Natural History Area is located in Anoka and Isanti counties, approximately 30 miles north of Saint Paul, MN. CCNHA lies at the boundary between prairie and forest. It is a mosaic of uplands dominated by oak savanna, prairie, hardwood forest, pine forests,and abandoned agricultural fields and of lowlands comprised of ash and cedar swamps, acid bogs, marshes, and sedge meadows. Large tracts of the pre-agricultural ecosystems of the region are preserved within its boundaries, as is a successional chronosequence of more than 80 old fields of known history. -93.22445 W -93.16289 E 45.44138 N 45.384865 S 1982 to 1993 1991 |
| long_lat |
ENVELOPE(-57.715,-57.715,51.467,51.467) ENVELOPE(-60.515,-60.515,-62.932,-62.932) ENVELOPE(-129.954,-129.954,54.598,54.598) |
| geographic |
Saint-Paul Recta Cedar Creek |
| geographic_facet |
Saint-Paul Recta Cedar Creek |
| genre |
Campanula rotundifolia |
| genre_facet |
Campanula rotundifolia |
| op_relation |
http://metacat.lternet.edu/knb/metacat/knb-lter-cdr.959103.2/xml knb-lter-cdr.959103.2 http://hdl.handle.net/10255/dryad.24001 |
| op_rights |
Code of Ethics and Rules for Use of Cedar Creek LTER and Related DataAs a condition for access to data provided by researchers of the Cedar Creek LTER, I, the data user, agrees to abide by the following code of ethics.I agree to notify the Cedar Creek LTER scientists who gathered data if I would like to use those data in any publication. I acknowledge that these data were gathered by Cedar Creek scientists because they had already perceived the importance of these data for a variety of scientific and societal issues. I will provide them with formal recognition that, at their discretion, may include co-authorship or acknowledgements on publications. I realize that the researchers who gathered these data may be using them for scientific analyses, papers or publications that are currently planned or in preparation, and that such activities have precedence over any that I might wish to prepare. In this case, my preparation of any work may be delayed, at the option of the Cedar Creek researchers involved, until their work is completed. Because it may be possible to misinterpret a data set if it is taken out of context, I will seek the assistance and opinion of those Cedar Creek researchers involved in the design of a study and the collection of the data as I analyze the data. Moreover, I realize that this computer data set is not complete, and it may contain errors. The complete data set includes extensive written documentation, which should be referenced to reduce the chance of errors in data and errors of interpretation. |
| _version_ |
1766383846793674752 |
| spelling |
ftdryad:oai:v1.datadryad.org:10255/dryad.24001 2023-05-15T15:48:44+02:00 Effects of various nutrients on vegetation . Year 1991 Raw data by plant species The Cedar Creek Natural History Area is located in Anoka and Isanti counties, approximately 30 miles north of Saint Paul, MN. CCNHA lies at the boundary between prairie and forest. It is a mosaic of uplands dominated by oak savanna, prairie, hardwood forest, pine forests,and abandoned agricultural fields and of lowlands comprised of ash and cedar swamps, acid bogs, marshes, and sedge meadows. Large tracts of the pre-agricultural ecosystems of the region are preserved within its boundaries, as is a successional chronosequence of more than 80 old fields of known history. -93.22445 W -93.16289 E 45.44138 N 45.384865 S 1982 to 1993 1991 1993 text/plain http://hdl.handle.net/10255/dryad.24001 http://metacat.lternet.edu/knb/metacat/knb-lter-cdr.959103.2/xml unknown http://metacat.lternet.edu/knb/metacat/knb-lter-cdr.959103.2/xml knb-lter-cdr.959103.2 http://hdl.handle.net/10255/dryad.24001 Code of Ethics and Rules for Use of Cedar Creek LTER and Related DataAs a condition for access to data provided by researchers of the Cedar Creek LTER, I, the data user, agrees to abide by the following code of ethics.I agree to notify the Cedar Creek LTER scientists who gathered data if I would like to use those data in any publication. I acknowledge that these data were gathered by Cedar Creek scientists because they had already perceived the importance of these data for a variety of scientific and societal issues. I will provide them with formal recognition that, at their discretion, may include co-authorship or acknowledgements on publications. I realize that the researchers who gathered these data may be using them for scientific analyses, papers or publications that are currently planned or in preparation, and that such activities have precedence over any that I might wish to prepare. In this case, my preparation of any work may be delayed, at the option of the Cedar Creek researchers involved, until their work is completed. Because it may be possible to misinterpret a data set if it is taken out of context, I will seek the assistance and opinion of those Cedar Creek researchers involved in the design of a study and the collection of the data as I analyze the data. Moreover, I realize that this computer data set is not complete, and it may contain errors. The complete data set includes extensive written documentation, which should be referenced to reduce the chance of errors in data and errors of interpretation. Cedar Creek Natural History Area Long Term Ecology Successional dynamics Primary Productivity Disturbance Patterns Nutrient Budgets Nutrient Cycles Climatic Variation Biodiversity Ecosystem functioning Nitrogen limitation Fire Frequency Plant Competition MOSSES LICHENS MISCELLANEOUS LITTER AGROPYRON REPENS POA PRATENSIS SETARIA LUTESCENS GLAUCA EUPHORBIA GLYPTOSPERMA PHYSALIS HETEROPHYLLA ARISTIDA BASIRAMEA CREPIS TECTORUM ERIGERON CANADENSIS ARABIS DIVARICARPA CENCHRUS LONGISPINUS LESPEDEZA CAPITATA SCHIZACHYRIUM SCOPARIUM ACHILLEA MILLEFOLIUM LANULOSA AMBROSIA ARTEMISIIFOLIA ELATIO ANEMONE CYLINDRICA BERTEROA INCANA HEDEOMA HISPIDA LYCHNIS ALBA POTENTILLA RECTA SILENE ANTIRRHINA MISC. HERBS PANICUM OLIGOSANTHES ERIGERON STRIGOSUS POLYGONUM CONVOLVULUS TRADESCANTIA OCCIDENTALIS DIGITARIA ISCHAEMUM GNAPHALIUM OBTUSIFOLIUM POLYGONUM TENUE HIERACIUM LONGIPILUM OENOTHERA BIENNIS ASCLEPIAS SYRIACA FRAGARIA VIRGINIANA ERAGROSTIS SPECTABILIS ARTEMISIA CAUDATA LEPIDIUM DENSIFLORUM TRAGOPOGON DUBIUS MAJOR EUPHORBIA SUPINA MOLLUGO VERTICILLATA AGROSTIS SCABRA CYPERUS SP POLYGALA POLYGAMA RUMEX ACETOSELLA LITHOSPERMUM CAROLINENSE VERBASCUM THAPSUS SOLIDAGO NEMORALIS ANDROPOGON GERARDI PINUS STROBUS LACTUCA CANADENSIS LACTUCA SP LIATRIS ASPERA PANICUM CAPILLARE CHENOPODIUM LEPTOPHYLLUM DESMODIUM CANADENSE SOLIDAGO RIGIDA FUNGI PANICUM PERLONGUM SORGHASTRUM NUTANS ROSA ARKANSANA SISYRINCHIUM CAMPESTRE OXYBAPHUS HIRSUTUS EUPHORBIA COROLLATA PANICUM PRAECOCIOUS AMBROSIA CORONOPIFOLIA ARTEMISIA LUDOVICIANA ASTER AZUREUS EQUISETUM LAEVIGATUM CAREX SP LATHYRUS VENOSUS LITHOSPERMUM CANESCENS CAMPANULA ROTUNDIFOLIA PHYSALIS VIRGINIANA VIOLA PEDATIFIDA MONARDA FISTULOSA RUDBECKIA SEROTINA CHENOPODIUM ALBA CALAMOVILFA LONGIFOLIA AMORPHA CANESCENS ASCLEPIAS TUBEROSA PANICUM VIRGATUM SPOROBOLUS CRYPTANDRIS STIPA SPARTEA HELIANTHUS LAETIFLORUS RHUS GLABRA RANUNCULUS RHOMBOIDEUS COMMANDRA RICHARDSIANA DELPHINIUM VIRESCENS dataset 1993 ftdryad 2020-01-01T14:47:19Z This experiment was conducted within the fenced areas of fields A, B, C, and D. The purpose of this experiment was to determine the effect of various nutrients on vegetation. There were eight different nutrients and a control. The different nutrients were N, P, K, Ca, Mg, Na, H2O, and a combination of trace metals. For details see nutrient details . There were 36 plots in each field, 4 replicates of the 9 treatment levels. The plots were 1 meter by 4 meters and were laid out in a 4 by 9 grid. The grid was divided into 4 quarters and treatments were assigned with a randomized block design. Dataset Campanula rotundifolia Dryad Digital Repository (Duke University) Saint-Paul ENVELOPE(-57.715,-57.715,51.467,51.467) Recta ENVELOPE(-60.515,-60.515,-62.932,-62.932) Cedar Creek ENVELOPE(-129.954,-129.954,54.598,54.598) |