Data from: Empirical evidence that large marine predator foraging behavior is consistent with area-restricted search theory

When prey is patchily distributed, predators are expected to spend more time searching for food in proximity of recent prey captures before searching in other areas. This behavior, known as area-restricted search, results in predators remaining localized in areas where prey had been detected previou...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Bailey, Helen, Lyubchich, Slava, Wingfield, Jessica, Fandel, Amber, Garrod, Aran, Rice, Aaron N.
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:unknown
Published: 2019
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10255/dryad.212917
https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.bb48rf0
id ftdryad:oai:v1.datadryad.org:10255/dryad.212917
record_format openpolar
spelling ftdryad:oai:v1.datadryad.org:10255/dryad.212917 2023-05-15T17:45:39+02:00 Data from: Empirical evidence that large marine predator foraging behavior is consistent with area-restricted search theory Bailey, Helen Lyubchich, Slava Wingfield, Jessica Fandel, Amber Garrod, Aran Rice, Aaron N. Northwest Atlantic Ocean 2019-06-20T19:41:51Z http://hdl.handle.net/10255/dryad.212917 https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.bb48rf0 unknown doi:10.5061/dryad.bb48rf0/1 doi:10.5061/dryad.bb48rf0/2 doi:10.1002/ecy.2743 doi:10.5061/dryad.bb48rf0 Bailey H, Lyubchich V, Wingfield J, Fandel A, Garrod A, Rice AN (2019) Empirical evidence that large marine predator foraging behavior is consistent with area‐restricted search theory. Ecology. http://hdl.handle.net/10255/dryad.212917 foraging ecology passive acoustic monitoring Article 2019 ftdryad https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.bb48rf0 https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.bb48rf0/1 https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.bb48rf0/2 https://doi.org/10.1002/ecy.2743 2020-01-01T16:26:42Z When prey is patchily distributed, predators are expected to spend more time searching for food in proximity of recent prey captures before searching in other areas. This behavior, known as area-restricted search, results in predators remaining localized in areas where prey had been detected previously because of the higher probability of encountering additional prey. However, few studies have tested these predictions on marine species because of the difficulties of observing feeding behavior. In this study, we utilized passive acoustic detections of echolocating dolphins to identify foraging behavior. C-PODs (click train detectors) were deployed for two years with an acoustic recorder attached to the same mooring during the second year. The time series of feeding buzzes, indicative of foraging behavior, revealed that both bottlenose (Tursiops truncatus) and common dolphins (Delphinus delphis) were more likely to stay in the area longer when foraging activity was high at the beginning of the encounter. The probability of foraging was also higher following previous foraging activity. This suggests that dolphins were feeding on spatially patchy prey and previous foraging experience influenced their movement behavior. This is consistent with the predictions of area-restricted search behavior, a nonrandom foraging strategy. Article in Journal/Newspaper Northwest Atlantic Dryad Digital Repository (Duke University)
institution Open Polar
collection Dryad Digital Repository (Duke University)
op_collection_id ftdryad
language unknown
topic foraging ecology
passive acoustic monitoring
spellingShingle foraging ecology
passive acoustic monitoring
Bailey, Helen
Lyubchich, Slava
Wingfield, Jessica
Fandel, Amber
Garrod, Aran
Rice, Aaron N.
Data from: Empirical evidence that large marine predator foraging behavior is consistent with area-restricted search theory
topic_facet foraging ecology
passive acoustic monitoring
description When prey is patchily distributed, predators are expected to spend more time searching for food in proximity of recent prey captures before searching in other areas. This behavior, known as area-restricted search, results in predators remaining localized in areas where prey had been detected previously because of the higher probability of encountering additional prey. However, few studies have tested these predictions on marine species because of the difficulties of observing feeding behavior. In this study, we utilized passive acoustic detections of echolocating dolphins to identify foraging behavior. C-PODs (click train detectors) were deployed for two years with an acoustic recorder attached to the same mooring during the second year. The time series of feeding buzzes, indicative of foraging behavior, revealed that both bottlenose (Tursiops truncatus) and common dolphins (Delphinus delphis) were more likely to stay in the area longer when foraging activity was high at the beginning of the encounter. The probability of foraging was also higher following previous foraging activity. This suggests that dolphins were feeding on spatially patchy prey and previous foraging experience influenced their movement behavior. This is consistent with the predictions of area-restricted search behavior, a nonrandom foraging strategy.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Bailey, Helen
Lyubchich, Slava
Wingfield, Jessica
Fandel, Amber
Garrod, Aran
Rice, Aaron N.
author_facet Bailey, Helen
Lyubchich, Slava
Wingfield, Jessica
Fandel, Amber
Garrod, Aran
Rice, Aaron N.
author_sort Bailey, Helen
title Data from: Empirical evidence that large marine predator foraging behavior is consistent with area-restricted search theory
title_short Data from: Empirical evidence that large marine predator foraging behavior is consistent with area-restricted search theory
title_full Data from: Empirical evidence that large marine predator foraging behavior is consistent with area-restricted search theory
title_fullStr Data from: Empirical evidence that large marine predator foraging behavior is consistent with area-restricted search theory
title_full_unstemmed Data from: Empirical evidence that large marine predator foraging behavior is consistent with area-restricted search theory
title_sort data from: empirical evidence that large marine predator foraging behavior is consistent with area-restricted search theory
publishDate 2019
url http://hdl.handle.net/10255/dryad.212917
https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.bb48rf0
op_coverage Northwest Atlantic Ocean
genre Northwest Atlantic
genre_facet Northwest Atlantic
op_relation doi:10.5061/dryad.bb48rf0/1
doi:10.5061/dryad.bb48rf0/2
doi:10.1002/ecy.2743
doi:10.5061/dryad.bb48rf0
Bailey H, Lyubchich V, Wingfield J, Fandel A, Garrod A, Rice AN (2019) Empirical evidence that large marine predator foraging behavior is consistent with area‐restricted search theory. Ecology.
http://hdl.handle.net/10255/dryad.212917
op_doi https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.bb48rf0
https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.bb48rf0/1
https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.bb48rf0/2
https://doi.org/10.1002/ecy.2743
_version_ 1766148845580845056