Data from: Does perspective matter? A case study comparing Eulerian and Lagrangian estimates of common murre (Uria aalge) distributions

Studies estimating species’ distributions require information about animal locations in space and time. Location data can be collected using surveys within a predetermined frame of reference (i.e., Eulerian sampling) or from animal-borne tracking devices (i.e., Lagrangian sampling). Integration of o...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Phillips, Elizabeth M., Horne, John K., Zamon, Jeannette E., Felis, Jonathan J., Adams, Josh
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:unknown
Published: 2019
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10255/dryad.209354
https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.1hg2n56
id ftdryad:oai:v1.datadryad.org:10255/dryad.209354
record_format openpolar
spelling ftdryad:oai:v1.datadryad.org:10255/dryad.209354 2023-05-15T15:56:04+02:00 Data from: Does perspective matter? A case study comparing Eulerian and Lagrangian estimates of common murre (Uria aalge) distributions Phillips, Elizabeth M. Horne, John K. Zamon, Jeannette E. Felis, Jonathan J. Adams, Josh 2019-03-28T15:56:56Z http://hdl.handle.net/10255/dryad.209354 https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.1hg2n56 unknown doi:10.5061/dryad.1hg2n56/1 doi:10.1002/ece3.5083 doi:10.5061/dryad.1hg2n56 Phillips EM, Horne JK, Zamon JE, Felis JJ, Adams J (2019) Does perspective matter? A case study comparing Eulerian and Lagrangian estimates of common murre ( Uria aalge ) distributions. Ecology and Evolution. http://hdl.handle.net/10255/dryad.209354 Article 2019 ftdryad https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.1hg2n56 https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.1hg2n56/1 https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.5083 2020-01-01T16:24:46Z Studies estimating species’ distributions require information about animal locations in space and time. Location data can be collected using surveys within a predetermined frame of reference (i.e., Eulerian sampling) or from animal-borne tracking devices (i.e., Lagrangian sampling). Integration of observations obtained from Eulerian and Lagrangian perspectives can provide insights into animal movement and habitat use. However, contemporaneous data from both perspectives are rarely available, making examination of biases of each sampling approach difficult to quantify. We compared distributions of a mobile seabird observed concurrently from ship, aerial, and satellite tag surveys during May, June, and July 2012 in the northern California Current. We calculated utilization distributions to quantify and compare variability in common murre (Uria aalge) space use and examine how sampling perspective and platform influence observed patterns. Spatial distributions of murres were similar in May, regardless of sampling perspective. Greatest density distributions occurred in coastal waters off southern Washington and northern Oregon, near large murre colonies and the mouth of the Columbia River. Density distributions of murres estimated from ship and aerial surveys in June and July were similar to those observed in May, whereas distributions of satellite-tagged murres in June and July indicated northward movement into British Columbia, Canada, resulting in different patterns observed from Eulerian and Lagrangian perspectives. These results suggest that the population of murres observed in the northern California Current during spring and summer includes relatively stationary individuals attending breeding colonies and non-stationary, vagile adults and subadults. Given the expected growth of telemetry studies and advances in survey technology (e.g., unmanned aerial systems), these results highlight the importance of considering methodological approaches, spatial extent, and synopticity of distribution data sets prior to integrating data from different sampling perspectives. Article in Journal/Newspaper Common Murre Uria aalge uria Dryad Digital Repository (Duke University) British Columbia ENVELOPE(-125.003,-125.003,54.000,54.000) Canada
institution Open Polar
collection Dryad Digital Repository (Duke University)
op_collection_id ftdryad
language unknown
description Studies estimating species’ distributions require information about animal locations in space and time. Location data can be collected using surveys within a predetermined frame of reference (i.e., Eulerian sampling) or from animal-borne tracking devices (i.e., Lagrangian sampling). Integration of observations obtained from Eulerian and Lagrangian perspectives can provide insights into animal movement and habitat use. However, contemporaneous data from both perspectives are rarely available, making examination of biases of each sampling approach difficult to quantify. We compared distributions of a mobile seabird observed concurrently from ship, aerial, and satellite tag surveys during May, June, and July 2012 in the northern California Current. We calculated utilization distributions to quantify and compare variability in common murre (Uria aalge) space use and examine how sampling perspective and platform influence observed patterns. Spatial distributions of murres were similar in May, regardless of sampling perspective. Greatest density distributions occurred in coastal waters off southern Washington and northern Oregon, near large murre colonies and the mouth of the Columbia River. Density distributions of murres estimated from ship and aerial surveys in June and July were similar to those observed in May, whereas distributions of satellite-tagged murres in June and July indicated northward movement into British Columbia, Canada, resulting in different patterns observed from Eulerian and Lagrangian perspectives. These results suggest that the population of murres observed in the northern California Current during spring and summer includes relatively stationary individuals attending breeding colonies and non-stationary, vagile adults and subadults. Given the expected growth of telemetry studies and advances in survey technology (e.g., unmanned aerial systems), these results highlight the importance of considering methodological approaches, spatial extent, and synopticity of distribution data sets prior to integrating data from different sampling perspectives.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Phillips, Elizabeth M.
Horne, John K.
Zamon, Jeannette E.
Felis, Jonathan J.
Adams, Josh
spellingShingle Phillips, Elizabeth M.
Horne, John K.
Zamon, Jeannette E.
Felis, Jonathan J.
Adams, Josh
Data from: Does perspective matter? A case study comparing Eulerian and Lagrangian estimates of common murre (Uria aalge) distributions
author_facet Phillips, Elizabeth M.
Horne, John K.
Zamon, Jeannette E.
Felis, Jonathan J.
Adams, Josh
author_sort Phillips, Elizabeth M.
title Data from: Does perspective matter? A case study comparing Eulerian and Lagrangian estimates of common murre (Uria aalge) distributions
title_short Data from: Does perspective matter? A case study comparing Eulerian and Lagrangian estimates of common murre (Uria aalge) distributions
title_full Data from: Does perspective matter? A case study comparing Eulerian and Lagrangian estimates of common murre (Uria aalge) distributions
title_fullStr Data from: Does perspective matter? A case study comparing Eulerian and Lagrangian estimates of common murre (Uria aalge) distributions
title_full_unstemmed Data from: Does perspective matter? A case study comparing Eulerian and Lagrangian estimates of common murre (Uria aalge) distributions
title_sort data from: does perspective matter? a case study comparing eulerian and lagrangian estimates of common murre (uria aalge) distributions
publishDate 2019
url http://hdl.handle.net/10255/dryad.209354
https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.1hg2n56
long_lat ENVELOPE(-125.003,-125.003,54.000,54.000)
geographic British Columbia
Canada
geographic_facet British Columbia
Canada
genre Common Murre
Uria aalge
uria
genre_facet Common Murre
Uria aalge
uria
op_relation doi:10.5061/dryad.1hg2n56/1
doi:10.1002/ece3.5083
doi:10.5061/dryad.1hg2n56
Phillips EM, Horne JK, Zamon JE, Felis JJ, Adams J (2019) Does perspective matter? A case study comparing Eulerian and Lagrangian estimates of common murre ( Uria aalge ) distributions. Ecology and Evolution.
http://hdl.handle.net/10255/dryad.209354
op_doi https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.1hg2n56
https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.1hg2n56/1
https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.5083
_version_ 1766391546858438656