Data from: Can we rely on selected genetic markers for population identification? evidence from coastal Atlantic cod

The use of genetic markers under putative selection in population studies carries the potential for erroneous identification of populations and misassignment of individuals to population of origin. Selected markers are nevertheless attractive, especially in marine organisms that are characterized by...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jorde, Per Erik, Synnes, Ann-Elin, Espeland, Sigurd Heiberg, Sodeland, Marte, Knutsen, Halvor
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:unknown
Published: 2019
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10255/dryad.194354
https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.k718h66
id ftdryad:oai:v1.datadryad.org:10255/dryad.194354
record_format openpolar
spelling ftdryad:oai:v1.datadryad.org:10255/dryad.194354 2023-05-15T15:27:20+02:00 Data from: Can we rely on selected genetic markers for population identification? evidence from coastal Atlantic cod Jorde, Per Erik Synnes, Ann-Elin Espeland, Sigurd Heiberg Sodeland, Marte Knutsen, Halvor Skagerrak North Sea 2015 2019-01-04T22:20:30Z http://hdl.handle.net/10255/dryad.194354 https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.k718h66 unknown doi:10.5061/dryad.k718h66/1 doi:10.1002/ece3.4648 doi:10.5061/dryad.k718h66 Jorde PE, Synnes A, Espeland SH, Sodeland M, Knutsen H (2018) Can we rely on selected genetic markers for population identification? Evidence from coastal Atlantic cod. Ecology and Evolution 8(24): 12547-12558. http://hdl.handle.net/10255/dryad.194354 population genetics natural selection statistical assignment population-of-origin marine fish Article 2019 ftdryad https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.k718h66 https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.k718h66/1 https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.4648 2020-01-01T16:16:57Z The use of genetic markers under putative selection in population studies carries the potential for erroneous identification of populations and misassignment of individuals to population of origin. Selected markers are nevertheless attractive, especially in marine organisms that are characterized by weak population structure at neutral loci. Highly fecund species may tolerate the cost of strong selective mortality during early life stages, potentially leading to a shift in offspring genotypes away from the parental proportions. In Atlantic cod, recent genetic studies have uncovered different genotype clusters apparently representing phenotypically cryptic populations that coexist in coastal waters. Here, we tested if a high‐graded SNP panel specifically designed to classify individual cod to population of origin may be unreliable because of natural selection acting on the SNPs or their linked background. Temporal samples of cod were collected from two fjords, starting at the earliest life stage (pelagic eggs) and carried on until late autumn (bottom‐settled juveniles), covering the period during summer of high natural mortality. Despite the potential for selective mortality during the study period, we found no evidence for selection, as both cod types occurred throughout the season, already in the earliest egg samples, and there was no evidence for a shift during the season in the proportions of one or the other type. We conclude that high‐graded marker panels under putative natural selection represent a valid and useful tool for identifying biological population structure in this highly fecund species and presumably in others. Article in Journal/Newspaper atlantic cod Dryad Digital Repository (Duke University)
institution Open Polar
collection Dryad Digital Repository (Duke University)
op_collection_id ftdryad
language unknown
topic population genetics
natural selection
statistical assignment
population-of-origin
marine fish
spellingShingle population genetics
natural selection
statistical assignment
population-of-origin
marine fish
Jorde, Per Erik
Synnes, Ann-Elin
Espeland, Sigurd Heiberg
Sodeland, Marte
Knutsen, Halvor
Data from: Can we rely on selected genetic markers for population identification? evidence from coastal Atlantic cod
topic_facet population genetics
natural selection
statistical assignment
population-of-origin
marine fish
description The use of genetic markers under putative selection in population studies carries the potential for erroneous identification of populations and misassignment of individuals to population of origin. Selected markers are nevertheless attractive, especially in marine organisms that are characterized by weak population structure at neutral loci. Highly fecund species may tolerate the cost of strong selective mortality during early life stages, potentially leading to a shift in offspring genotypes away from the parental proportions. In Atlantic cod, recent genetic studies have uncovered different genotype clusters apparently representing phenotypically cryptic populations that coexist in coastal waters. Here, we tested if a high‐graded SNP panel specifically designed to classify individual cod to population of origin may be unreliable because of natural selection acting on the SNPs or their linked background. Temporal samples of cod were collected from two fjords, starting at the earliest life stage (pelagic eggs) and carried on until late autumn (bottom‐settled juveniles), covering the period during summer of high natural mortality. Despite the potential for selective mortality during the study period, we found no evidence for selection, as both cod types occurred throughout the season, already in the earliest egg samples, and there was no evidence for a shift during the season in the proportions of one or the other type. We conclude that high‐graded marker panels under putative natural selection represent a valid and useful tool for identifying biological population structure in this highly fecund species and presumably in others.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Jorde, Per Erik
Synnes, Ann-Elin
Espeland, Sigurd Heiberg
Sodeland, Marte
Knutsen, Halvor
author_facet Jorde, Per Erik
Synnes, Ann-Elin
Espeland, Sigurd Heiberg
Sodeland, Marte
Knutsen, Halvor
author_sort Jorde, Per Erik
title Data from: Can we rely on selected genetic markers for population identification? evidence from coastal Atlantic cod
title_short Data from: Can we rely on selected genetic markers for population identification? evidence from coastal Atlantic cod
title_full Data from: Can we rely on selected genetic markers for population identification? evidence from coastal Atlantic cod
title_fullStr Data from: Can we rely on selected genetic markers for population identification? evidence from coastal Atlantic cod
title_full_unstemmed Data from: Can we rely on selected genetic markers for population identification? evidence from coastal Atlantic cod
title_sort data from: can we rely on selected genetic markers for population identification? evidence from coastal atlantic cod
publishDate 2019
url http://hdl.handle.net/10255/dryad.194354
https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.k718h66
op_coverage Skagerrak
North Sea
2015
genre atlantic cod
genre_facet atlantic cod
op_relation doi:10.5061/dryad.k718h66/1
doi:10.1002/ece3.4648
doi:10.5061/dryad.k718h66
Jorde PE, Synnes A, Espeland SH, Sodeland M, Knutsen H (2018) Can we rely on selected genetic markers for population identification? Evidence from coastal Atlantic cod. Ecology and Evolution 8(24): 12547-12558.
http://hdl.handle.net/10255/dryad.194354
op_doi https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.k718h66
https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.k718h66/1
https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.4648
_version_ 1766357783816437760