Data from: Hidden survival heterogeneity of three common eider populations in response to climate fluctuations

(1) Understanding how individuals and populations respond to fluctuations in climatic conditions is critical to explain and anticipate changes in ecological systems. Most such studies focus on climate impacts on single populations without considering inter- and intra-population heterogeneity. Howeve...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Guéry, Loreleï, Descamps, Sébastien, Pradel, Roger, Hanssen, Sveinn Are, Erikstad, Kjell Einar, Gabrielsen, Geir W., Gilchrist, H. Grant, Bêty, Joël
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:unknown
Published: 2017
Subjects:
NAO
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10255/dryad.134971
https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.n026d
id ftdryad:oai:v1.datadryad.org:10255/dryad.134971
record_format openpolar
spelling ftdryad:oai:v1.datadryad.org:10255/dryad.134971 2023-05-15T14:55:20+02:00 Data from: Hidden survival heterogeneity of three common eider populations in response to climate fluctuations Guéry, Loreleï Descamps, Sébastien Pradel, Roger Hanssen, Sveinn Are Erikstad, Kjell Einar Gabrielsen, Geir W. Gilchrist, H. Grant Bêty, Joël Canadian Arctic East Bay Island southwest Greenland southern Atlantic Canada Svalbard Prins Heinrich Island northern Iceland northern Norway Grindøya Island Tromsø Anthropocène 2017-02-01T16:19:01Z http://hdl.handle.net/10255/dryad.134971 https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.n026d unknown doi:10.5061/dryad.n026d/1 doi:10.5061/dryad.n026d/2 doi:10.5061/dryad.n026d/3 doi:10.1111/1365-2656.12643 doi:10.5061/dryad.n026d Guéry L, Descamps S, Pradel R, Hanssen SA, Erikstad KE, Gabrielsen GW, Gilchrist HG, Bêty J (2017) Hidden survival heterogeneity of three Common eider populations in response to climate fluctuations. Journal of Animal Ecology 86(3): 683–693. 0021-8790 http://hdl.handle.net/10255/dryad.134971 Seabirds Life history strategy NAO multi-event Hidden states mixture models Arctic common eider Article 2017 ftdryad https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.n026d https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.n026d/1 https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.n026d/2 https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.n026d/3 https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2656.12643 2020-01-01T15:45:06Z (1) Understanding how individuals and populations respond to fluctuations in climatic conditions is critical to explain and anticipate changes in ecological systems. Most such studies focus on climate impacts on single populations without considering inter- and intra-population heterogeneity. However, comparing geographically dispersed populations limits the risk of faulty generalizations and helps to improve ecological and demographic models. (2) We aimed to determine whether differences in migration tactics among and within populations would induce inter- or intra-population heterogeneity in survival in relation to winter climate fluctuations. Our study species was the Common eider (Somateria mollissima), a marine duck with a circumpolar distribution, which is strongly affected by climatic conditions during several phases of its annual cycle. (3) Capture-mark-recapture (CMR) data were collected in two arctic (northern Canada and Svalbard) and one subarctic (northern Norway) population over a period of 18, 15 and 29 years, respectively. These three populations have different migration tactics and experience different winter climatic conditions. Using multi-event and mixture modelling, we assessed the association between adult female eider survival and winter conditions as measured by the North Atlantic Oscillation index. (4) We found that winter weather conditions affected survival of female eiders from each of these three populations. However, different mechanisms seemed to be involved. Survival of the two migrating arctic populations was impacted directly by changes in the NAO, whereas the subarctic resident population was affected by the NAO with time lags of two to three years. Moreover, we found evidence for intra-population heterogeneity in the survival response to the winter NAO in the Canadian eider population, where individuals migrate to distinct wintering areas. (5) Our results illustrate how individuals and populations of the same species can vary in their responses to climate variation. We suspect that the found variation in survival response of birds to winter conditions is partly explained by differences in migration tactic. Detecting and accounting for inter- and intra-population heterogeneity will improve our predictions concerning the response of wildlife to global changes. Article in Journal/Newspaper Arctic Common Eider Greenland Iceland North Atlantic North Atlantic oscillation Northern Norway Somateria mollissima Subarctic Svalbard Tromsø Dryad Digital Repository (Duke University) Arctic Svalbard Canada Greenland Norway Tromsø East Bay ENVELOPE(-36.426,-36.426,-54.288,-54.288) Grindøya ENVELOPE(7.564,7.564,63.053,63.053)
institution Open Polar
collection Dryad Digital Repository (Duke University)
op_collection_id ftdryad
language unknown
topic Seabirds
Life history strategy
NAO
multi-event
Hidden states
mixture models
Arctic
common eider
spellingShingle Seabirds
Life history strategy
NAO
multi-event
Hidden states
mixture models
Arctic
common eider
Guéry, Loreleï
Descamps, Sébastien
Pradel, Roger
Hanssen, Sveinn Are
Erikstad, Kjell Einar
Gabrielsen, Geir W.
Gilchrist, H. Grant
Bêty, Joël
Data from: Hidden survival heterogeneity of three common eider populations in response to climate fluctuations
topic_facet Seabirds
Life history strategy
NAO
multi-event
Hidden states
mixture models
Arctic
common eider
description (1) Understanding how individuals and populations respond to fluctuations in climatic conditions is critical to explain and anticipate changes in ecological systems. Most such studies focus on climate impacts on single populations without considering inter- and intra-population heterogeneity. However, comparing geographically dispersed populations limits the risk of faulty generalizations and helps to improve ecological and demographic models. (2) We aimed to determine whether differences in migration tactics among and within populations would induce inter- or intra-population heterogeneity in survival in relation to winter climate fluctuations. Our study species was the Common eider (Somateria mollissima), a marine duck with a circumpolar distribution, which is strongly affected by climatic conditions during several phases of its annual cycle. (3) Capture-mark-recapture (CMR) data were collected in two arctic (northern Canada and Svalbard) and one subarctic (northern Norway) population over a period of 18, 15 and 29 years, respectively. These three populations have different migration tactics and experience different winter climatic conditions. Using multi-event and mixture modelling, we assessed the association between adult female eider survival and winter conditions as measured by the North Atlantic Oscillation index. (4) We found that winter weather conditions affected survival of female eiders from each of these three populations. However, different mechanisms seemed to be involved. Survival of the two migrating arctic populations was impacted directly by changes in the NAO, whereas the subarctic resident population was affected by the NAO with time lags of two to three years. Moreover, we found evidence for intra-population heterogeneity in the survival response to the winter NAO in the Canadian eider population, where individuals migrate to distinct wintering areas. (5) Our results illustrate how individuals and populations of the same species can vary in their responses to climate variation. We suspect that the found variation in survival response of birds to winter conditions is partly explained by differences in migration tactic. Detecting and accounting for inter- and intra-population heterogeneity will improve our predictions concerning the response of wildlife to global changes.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Guéry, Loreleï
Descamps, Sébastien
Pradel, Roger
Hanssen, Sveinn Are
Erikstad, Kjell Einar
Gabrielsen, Geir W.
Gilchrist, H. Grant
Bêty, Joël
author_facet Guéry, Loreleï
Descamps, Sébastien
Pradel, Roger
Hanssen, Sveinn Are
Erikstad, Kjell Einar
Gabrielsen, Geir W.
Gilchrist, H. Grant
Bêty, Joël
author_sort Guéry, Loreleï
title Data from: Hidden survival heterogeneity of three common eider populations in response to climate fluctuations
title_short Data from: Hidden survival heterogeneity of three common eider populations in response to climate fluctuations
title_full Data from: Hidden survival heterogeneity of three common eider populations in response to climate fluctuations
title_fullStr Data from: Hidden survival heterogeneity of three common eider populations in response to climate fluctuations
title_full_unstemmed Data from: Hidden survival heterogeneity of three common eider populations in response to climate fluctuations
title_sort data from: hidden survival heterogeneity of three common eider populations in response to climate fluctuations
publishDate 2017
url http://hdl.handle.net/10255/dryad.134971
https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.n026d
op_coverage Canadian Arctic
East Bay Island
southwest Greenland
southern Atlantic Canada
Svalbard
Prins Heinrich Island
northern Iceland
northern Norway
Grindøya Island
Tromsø
Anthropocène
long_lat ENVELOPE(-36.426,-36.426,-54.288,-54.288)
ENVELOPE(7.564,7.564,63.053,63.053)
geographic Arctic
Svalbard
Canada
Greenland
Norway
Tromsø
East Bay
Grindøya
geographic_facet Arctic
Svalbard
Canada
Greenland
Norway
Tromsø
East Bay
Grindøya
genre Arctic
Common Eider
Greenland
Iceland
North Atlantic
North Atlantic oscillation
Northern Norway
Somateria mollissima
Subarctic
Svalbard
Tromsø
genre_facet Arctic
Common Eider
Greenland
Iceland
North Atlantic
North Atlantic oscillation
Northern Norway
Somateria mollissima
Subarctic
Svalbard
Tromsø
op_relation doi:10.5061/dryad.n026d/1
doi:10.5061/dryad.n026d/2
doi:10.5061/dryad.n026d/3
doi:10.1111/1365-2656.12643
doi:10.5061/dryad.n026d
Guéry L, Descamps S, Pradel R, Hanssen SA, Erikstad KE, Gabrielsen GW, Gilchrist HG, Bêty J (2017) Hidden survival heterogeneity of three Common eider populations in response to climate fluctuations. Journal of Animal Ecology 86(3): 683–693.
0021-8790
http://hdl.handle.net/10255/dryad.134971
op_doi https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.n026d
https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.n026d/1
https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.n026d/2
https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.n026d/3
https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2656.12643
_version_ 1766327132935421952