Data from: Hidden survival heterogeneity of three common eider populations in response to climate fluctuations
(1) Understanding how individuals and populations respond to fluctuations in climatic conditions is critical to explain and anticipate changes in ecological systems. Most such studies focus on climate impacts on single populations without considering inter- and intra-population heterogeneity. Howeve...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
Language: | unknown |
Published: |
2017
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/10255/dryad.134971 https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.n026d |
id |
ftdryad:oai:v1.datadryad.org:10255/dryad.134971 |
---|---|
record_format |
openpolar |
spelling |
ftdryad:oai:v1.datadryad.org:10255/dryad.134971 2023-05-15T14:55:20+02:00 Data from: Hidden survival heterogeneity of three common eider populations in response to climate fluctuations Guéry, Loreleï Descamps, Sébastien Pradel, Roger Hanssen, Sveinn Are Erikstad, Kjell Einar Gabrielsen, Geir W. Gilchrist, H. Grant Bêty, Joël Canadian Arctic East Bay Island southwest Greenland southern Atlantic Canada Svalbard Prins Heinrich Island northern Iceland northern Norway Grindøya Island Tromsø Anthropocène 2017-02-01T16:19:01Z http://hdl.handle.net/10255/dryad.134971 https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.n026d unknown doi:10.5061/dryad.n026d/1 doi:10.5061/dryad.n026d/2 doi:10.5061/dryad.n026d/3 doi:10.1111/1365-2656.12643 doi:10.5061/dryad.n026d Guéry L, Descamps S, Pradel R, Hanssen SA, Erikstad KE, Gabrielsen GW, Gilchrist HG, Bêty J (2017) Hidden survival heterogeneity of three Common eider populations in response to climate fluctuations. Journal of Animal Ecology 86(3): 683–693. 0021-8790 http://hdl.handle.net/10255/dryad.134971 Seabirds Life history strategy NAO multi-event Hidden states mixture models Arctic common eider Article 2017 ftdryad https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.n026d https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.n026d/1 https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.n026d/2 https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.n026d/3 https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2656.12643 2020-01-01T15:45:06Z (1) Understanding how individuals and populations respond to fluctuations in climatic conditions is critical to explain and anticipate changes in ecological systems. Most such studies focus on climate impacts on single populations without considering inter- and intra-population heterogeneity. However, comparing geographically dispersed populations limits the risk of faulty generalizations and helps to improve ecological and demographic models. (2) We aimed to determine whether differences in migration tactics among and within populations would induce inter- or intra-population heterogeneity in survival in relation to winter climate fluctuations. Our study species was the Common eider (Somateria mollissima), a marine duck with a circumpolar distribution, which is strongly affected by climatic conditions during several phases of its annual cycle. (3) Capture-mark-recapture (CMR) data were collected in two arctic (northern Canada and Svalbard) and one subarctic (northern Norway) population over a period of 18, 15 and 29 years, respectively. These three populations have different migration tactics and experience different winter climatic conditions. Using multi-event and mixture modelling, we assessed the association between adult female eider survival and winter conditions as measured by the North Atlantic Oscillation index. (4) We found that winter weather conditions affected survival of female eiders from each of these three populations. However, different mechanisms seemed to be involved. Survival of the two migrating arctic populations was impacted directly by changes in the NAO, whereas the subarctic resident population was affected by the NAO with time lags of two to three years. Moreover, we found evidence for intra-population heterogeneity in the survival response to the winter NAO in the Canadian eider population, where individuals migrate to distinct wintering areas. (5) Our results illustrate how individuals and populations of the same species can vary in their responses to climate variation. We suspect that the found variation in survival response of birds to winter conditions is partly explained by differences in migration tactic. Detecting and accounting for inter- and intra-population heterogeneity will improve our predictions concerning the response of wildlife to global changes. Article in Journal/Newspaper Arctic Common Eider Greenland Iceland North Atlantic North Atlantic oscillation Northern Norway Somateria mollissima Subarctic Svalbard Tromsø Dryad Digital Repository (Duke University) Arctic Svalbard Canada Greenland Norway Tromsø East Bay ENVELOPE(-36.426,-36.426,-54.288,-54.288) Grindøya ENVELOPE(7.564,7.564,63.053,63.053) |
institution |
Open Polar |
collection |
Dryad Digital Repository (Duke University) |
op_collection_id |
ftdryad |
language |
unknown |
topic |
Seabirds Life history strategy NAO multi-event Hidden states mixture models Arctic common eider |
spellingShingle |
Seabirds Life history strategy NAO multi-event Hidden states mixture models Arctic common eider Guéry, Loreleï Descamps, Sébastien Pradel, Roger Hanssen, Sveinn Are Erikstad, Kjell Einar Gabrielsen, Geir W. Gilchrist, H. Grant Bêty, Joël Data from: Hidden survival heterogeneity of three common eider populations in response to climate fluctuations |
topic_facet |
Seabirds Life history strategy NAO multi-event Hidden states mixture models Arctic common eider |
description |
(1) Understanding how individuals and populations respond to fluctuations in climatic conditions is critical to explain and anticipate changes in ecological systems. Most such studies focus on climate impacts on single populations without considering inter- and intra-population heterogeneity. However, comparing geographically dispersed populations limits the risk of faulty generalizations and helps to improve ecological and demographic models. (2) We aimed to determine whether differences in migration tactics among and within populations would induce inter- or intra-population heterogeneity in survival in relation to winter climate fluctuations. Our study species was the Common eider (Somateria mollissima), a marine duck with a circumpolar distribution, which is strongly affected by climatic conditions during several phases of its annual cycle. (3) Capture-mark-recapture (CMR) data were collected in two arctic (northern Canada and Svalbard) and one subarctic (northern Norway) population over a period of 18, 15 and 29 years, respectively. These three populations have different migration tactics and experience different winter climatic conditions. Using multi-event and mixture modelling, we assessed the association between adult female eider survival and winter conditions as measured by the North Atlantic Oscillation index. (4) We found that winter weather conditions affected survival of female eiders from each of these three populations. However, different mechanisms seemed to be involved. Survival of the two migrating arctic populations was impacted directly by changes in the NAO, whereas the subarctic resident population was affected by the NAO with time lags of two to three years. Moreover, we found evidence for intra-population heterogeneity in the survival response to the winter NAO in the Canadian eider population, where individuals migrate to distinct wintering areas. (5) Our results illustrate how individuals and populations of the same species can vary in their responses to climate variation. We suspect that the found variation in survival response of birds to winter conditions is partly explained by differences in migration tactic. Detecting and accounting for inter- and intra-population heterogeneity will improve our predictions concerning the response of wildlife to global changes. |
format |
Article in Journal/Newspaper |
author |
Guéry, Loreleï Descamps, Sébastien Pradel, Roger Hanssen, Sveinn Are Erikstad, Kjell Einar Gabrielsen, Geir W. Gilchrist, H. Grant Bêty, Joël |
author_facet |
Guéry, Loreleï Descamps, Sébastien Pradel, Roger Hanssen, Sveinn Are Erikstad, Kjell Einar Gabrielsen, Geir W. Gilchrist, H. Grant Bêty, Joël |
author_sort |
Guéry, Loreleï |
title |
Data from: Hidden survival heterogeneity of three common eider populations in response to climate fluctuations |
title_short |
Data from: Hidden survival heterogeneity of three common eider populations in response to climate fluctuations |
title_full |
Data from: Hidden survival heterogeneity of three common eider populations in response to climate fluctuations |
title_fullStr |
Data from: Hidden survival heterogeneity of three common eider populations in response to climate fluctuations |
title_full_unstemmed |
Data from: Hidden survival heterogeneity of three common eider populations in response to climate fluctuations |
title_sort |
data from: hidden survival heterogeneity of three common eider populations in response to climate fluctuations |
publishDate |
2017 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10255/dryad.134971 https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.n026d |
op_coverage |
Canadian Arctic East Bay Island southwest Greenland southern Atlantic Canada Svalbard Prins Heinrich Island northern Iceland northern Norway Grindøya Island Tromsø Anthropocène |
long_lat |
ENVELOPE(-36.426,-36.426,-54.288,-54.288) ENVELOPE(7.564,7.564,63.053,63.053) |
geographic |
Arctic Svalbard Canada Greenland Norway Tromsø East Bay Grindøya |
geographic_facet |
Arctic Svalbard Canada Greenland Norway Tromsø East Bay Grindøya |
genre |
Arctic Common Eider Greenland Iceland North Atlantic North Atlantic oscillation Northern Norway Somateria mollissima Subarctic Svalbard Tromsø |
genre_facet |
Arctic Common Eider Greenland Iceland North Atlantic North Atlantic oscillation Northern Norway Somateria mollissima Subarctic Svalbard Tromsø |
op_relation |
doi:10.5061/dryad.n026d/1 doi:10.5061/dryad.n026d/2 doi:10.5061/dryad.n026d/3 doi:10.1111/1365-2656.12643 doi:10.5061/dryad.n026d Guéry L, Descamps S, Pradel R, Hanssen SA, Erikstad KE, Gabrielsen GW, Gilchrist HG, Bêty J (2017) Hidden survival heterogeneity of three Common eider populations in response to climate fluctuations. Journal of Animal Ecology 86(3): 683–693. 0021-8790 http://hdl.handle.net/10255/dryad.134971 |
op_doi |
https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.n026d https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.n026d/1 https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.n026d/2 https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.n026d/3 https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2656.12643 |
_version_ |
1766327132935421952 |