Data from: State-space modelling of geolocation data reveals sex differences in the use of management areas by breeding northern fulmars

Effective management and conservation of terrestrially breeding marine predators requires information on connectivity between specific breeding sites and at-sea foraging areas. In the north-east Atlantic, efforts to monitor and manage the impacts of bycatch or pollution events within different Conve...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Edwards, Ewan W. J., Quinn, Lucy R., Thompson, Paul M.
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:unknown
Published: 2016
Subjects:
GLS
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10255/dryad.120433
https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.vb322
id ftdryad:oai:v1.datadryad.org:10255/dryad.120433
record_format openpolar
spelling ftdryad:oai:v1.datadryad.org:10255/dryad.120433 2023-05-15T15:39:13+02:00 Data from: State-space modelling of geolocation data reveals sex differences in the use of management areas by breeding northern fulmars Edwards, Ewan W. J. Quinn, Lucy R. Thompson, Paul M. north-east Atlantic Ocean European Union British Isles United Kingdom Scotland Orkney 2016-07-16T19:01:18Z http://hdl.handle.net/10255/dryad.120433 https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.vb322 unknown doi:10.5061/dryad.vb322/1 doi:10.1111/1365-2664.12751 doi:10.5061/dryad.vb322 Edwards EWJ, Quinn LR, Thompson PM (2016) State-space modelling of geolocation data reveals sex differences in the use of management areas by breeding northern fulmars. Journal of Applied Ecology 53(6): 1880-1889. 0021-8901 http://hdl.handle.net/10255/dryad.120433 double-tagging fisheries bycatch GLS geolocator validation Marine Strategy Framework Directive northern fulmar OSPAR spatial modelling tracking Article 2016 ftdryad https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.vb322 https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.vb322/1 https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12751 2020-01-01T15:37:19Z Effective management and conservation of terrestrially breeding marine predators requires information on connectivity between specific breeding sites and at-sea foraging areas. In the north-east Atlantic, efforts to monitor and manage the impacts of bycatch or pollution events within different Convention for the Protection of the Marine Environment of the North-East Atlantic (OSPAR) management regions are currently constrained by uncertainty over the origins of seabirds occurring in each area. Whilst Global Positioning System (GPS) loggers can now provide high resolution data on seabird foraging characteristics, their use is largely restricted to the chick-rearing period. Smaller light-based Global Location Sensors (geolocators) could provide valuable data during earlier phases of the breeding season, but additional information on their accuracy is required to assess this potential. We used incubation trip tracking data from 11 double-tagged (GPS/geolocator) northern fulmars Fulmarus glacialis L. within a state-space modelling (SSM) framework to estimate errors around geolocator locations. The SSM was then fitted to a larger sample of geolocator data from the pre-laying exodus using the mean of these error estimates. Geolocator data were first used to compare the trip durations of males and females during this critical pre-laying period. Outputs from the SSM were then used to characterize their spatial distribution and assess the extent of within-colony variation in the use of different OSPAR management regions. During the pre-laying exodus, fulmars from a single colony in the north-east of the United Kingdom foraged widely across several biogeographical regions, up to 2900 km from the colony. Most (60%) males remained within the North Sea region, whereas most (68%) females flew north, foraging within the Norwegian and Barents Sea. A small subset of birds (15%) travelled to the central North Atlantic. Foraging trips by males appeared to be shorter (x = 18 days, n = 20) than by females (x = 25 days, n = 19). Policy implications. Our results of state-space modelling of geolocation data collected from northern fulmars show that within-colony variation in ranging behaviour during the breeding season results in sex differences in exposure to threats such as fisheries bycatch and marine plastics. Birds from a single colony dispersed over several north-east Atlantic management areas. These patterns have implications for interpreting trends in colony-based monitoring schemes, and European Union Marine Strategy Framework programmes using these seabirds as an indicator species for monitoring trends in marine litter and prioritizing efforts to mitigate its impact. Article in Journal/Newspaper Barents Sea Fulmarus glacialis North Atlantic North East Atlantic Northern Fulmar Dryad Digital Repository (Duke University) Barents Sea Fulmar ENVELOPE(-46.016,-46.016,-60.616,-60.616)
institution Open Polar
collection Dryad Digital Repository (Duke University)
op_collection_id ftdryad
language unknown
topic double-tagging
fisheries bycatch
GLS
geolocator validation
Marine Strategy Framework Directive
northern fulmar
OSPAR
spatial modelling
tracking
spellingShingle double-tagging
fisheries bycatch
GLS
geolocator validation
Marine Strategy Framework Directive
northern fulmar
OSPAR
spatial modelling
tracking
Edwards, Ewan W. J.
Quinn, Lucy R.
Thompson, Paul M.
Data from: State-space modelling of geolocation data reveals sex differences in the use of management areas by breeding northern fulmars
topic_facet double-tagging
fisheries bycatch
GLS
geolocator validation
Marine Strategy Framework Directive
northern fulmar
OSPAR
spatial modelling
tracking
description Effective management and conservation of terrestrially breeding marine predators requires information on connectivity between specific breeding sites and at-sea foraging areas. In the north-east Atlantic, efforts to monitor and manage the impacts of bycatch or pollution events within different Convention for the Protection of the Marine Environment of the North-East Atlantic (OSPAR) management regions are currently constrained by uncertainty over the origins of seabirds occurring in each area. Whilst Global Positioning System (GPS) loggers can now provide high resolution data on seabird foraging characteristics, their use is largely restricted to the chick-rearing period. Smaller light-based Global Location Sensors (geolocators) could provide valuable data during earlier phases of the breeding season, but additional information on their accuracy is required to assess this potential. We used incubation trip tracking data from 11 double-tagged (GPS/geolocator) northern fulmars Fulmarus glacialis L. within a state-space modelling (SSM) framework to estimate errors around geolocator locations. The SSM was then fitted to a larger sample of geolocator data from the pre-laying exodus using the mean of these error estimates. Geolocator data were first used to compare the trip durations of males and females during this critical pre-laying period. Outputs from the SSM were then used to characterize their spatial distribution and assess the extent of within-colony variation in the use of different OSPAR management regions. During the pre-laying exodus, fulmars from a single colony in the north-east of the United Kingdom foraged widely across several biogeographical regions, up to 2900 km from the colony. Most (60%) males remained within the North Sea region, whereas most (68%) females flew north, foraging within the Norwegian and Barents Sea. A small subset of birds (15%) travelled to the central North Atlantic. Foraging trips by males appeared to be shorter (x = 18 days, n = 20) than by females (x = 25 days, n = 19). Policy implications. Our results of state-space modelling of geolocation data collected from northern fulmars show that within-colony variation in ranging behaviour during the breeding season results in sex differences in exposure to threats such as fisheries bycatch and marine plastics. Birds from a single colony dispersed over several north-east Atlantic management areas. These patterns have implications for interpreting trends in colony-based monitoring schemes, and European Union Marine Strategy Framework programmes using these seabirds as an indicator species for monitoring trends in marine litter and prioritizing efforts to mitigate its impact.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Edwards, Ewan W. J.
Quinn, Lucy R.
Thompson, Paul M.
author_facet Edwards, Ewan W. J.
Quinn, Lucy R.
Thompson, Paul M.
author_sort Edwards, Ewan W. J.
title Data from: State-space modelling of geolocation data reveals sex differences in the use of management areas by breeding northern fulmars
title_short Data from: State-space modelling of geolocation data reveals sex differences in the use of management areas by breeding northern fulmars
title_full Data from: State-space modelling of geolocation data reveals sex differences in the use of management areas by breeding northern fulmars
title_fullStr Data from: State-space modelling of geolocation data reveals sex differences in the use of management areas by breeding northern fulmars
title_full_unstemmed Data from: State-space modelling of geolocation data reveals sex differences in the use of management areas by breeding northern fulmars
title_sort data from: state-space modelling of geolocation data reveals sex differences in the use of management areas by breeding northern fulmars
publishDate 2016
url http://hdl.handle.net/10255/dryad.120433
https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.vb322
op_coverage north-east Atlantic Ocean
European Union
British Isles
United Kingdom
Scotland
Orkney
long_lat ENVELOPE(-46.016,-46.016,-60.616,-60.616)
geographic Barents Sea
Fulmar
geographic_facet Barents Sea
Fulmar
genre Barents Sea
Fulmarus glacialis
North Atlantic
North East Atlantic
Northern Fulmar
genre_facet Barents Sea
Fulmarus glacialis
North Atlantic
North East Atlantic
Northern Fulmar
op_relation doi:10.5061/dryad.vb322/1
doi:10.1111/1365-2664.12751
doi:10.5061/dryad.vb322
Edwards EWJ, Quinn LR, Thompson PM (2016) State-space modelling of geolocation data reveals sex differences in the use of management areas by breeding northern fulmars. Journal of Applied Ecology 53(6): 1880-1889.
0021-8901
http://hdl.handle.net/10255/dryad.120433
op_doi https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.vb322
https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.vb322/1
https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12751
_version_ 1766370698011344896