Long-Term Nitrogen Deposition: Effects on Succession Following Major Disturbances. Year 1990 Aboveground biomass data

The purpose of this experiment is to measure how initially disturbing an area and adding nitrogen over a long time will affect the number of species, the type of species present, the amount of annual growth, and the change from year to year in the growth of each species in a plant community which is...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Format: Dataset
Language:unknown
Published: 1992
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10255/dryad.11151
http://metacat.lternet.edu/knb/metacat/knb-lter-cdr.799002.2/xml
id ftdryad:oai:v1.datadryad.org:10255/dryad.11151
record_format openpolar
institution Open Polar
collection Dryad Digital Repository (Duke University)
op_collection_id ftdryad
language unknown
topic Cedar Creek Natural History Area
Long Term
Ecology
Successional dynamics
Primary Productivity
Disturbance Patterns
Nutrient Budgets
Nutrient Cycles
Climatic Variation
Biodiversity
Ecosystem functioning
Nitrogen limitation
Fire Frequency
Plant Competition
MISCELLANEOUS LITTER
AGROPYRON REPENS
POA PRATENSIS
PHYSALIS HETEROPHYLLA
MOSSES & LICHENS
AMBROSIA ARTEMISIIFOLIA ELATIOR
BERTEROA INCANA
HEDEOMA HISPIDA
LYCHNIS ALBA
POLYGONUM CONVOLVULUS
POLYGONUM TENUE
SCHIZACHYRIUM SCOPARIUM
SETARIA LUTESCENS (GLAUCA)
ARISTIDA BASIRAMEA
PHYSALIS VIRGINIANA
ANDROPOGON GERARDI
PANICUM PRAECOCIOUS
ERIGERON CANADENSIS
PENSTEMON GRACILIS
SILENE ANTIRRHINA
MISCELLANEOUS HERBS
MOLLUGO VERTICILLATA
LEPIDIUM DENSIFLORUM
TRAGOPOGON DUBIUS (MAJOR)
SALSOLA KALI
TRADESCANTIA OCCIDENTALIS
EUPHORBIA GLYPTOSPERMA
RUDBECKIA SEROTINA
HIERACIUM LONGIPILUM
ERAGROSTIS SPECTABILIS
PANICUM OLIGOSANTHES
ACHILLEA MILLEFOLIUM(LANULOSA)
SOLIDAGO NEMORALIS
POLYGALA POLYGAMA
ASCLEPIAS SYRIACA
PINUS STROBUS
CYPERUS SP
CYPERUS FILICULMIS
CAREX SP
CHENOPODIUM ALBUM
OENOTHERA BIENNIS
PHALARIS ARUNDINACEA
ARTEMISIA LUDOVICIANA
RUBUS SP
AMBROSIA CORONOPIFOLIA
EUPHORBIA COROLLATA
ARABIS DIVARICARPA
ROSA ARKANSANA
SORGHASTRUM NUTANS
OXYBAPHUS HIRSUTUS
LESPEDEZA CAPITATA
SOLIDAGO RIGIDA
PANICUM PERLONGUM
LATHYRUS VENOSUS
URTICA DIOICA
LITHOSPERMUM CANESCENS
EQUISETUM LAEVIGATUM
ASTER AZUREUS
VIOLA PEDATIFIDA
ASCLEPIAS TUBEROSA
HIERACIUM KALMII
AMELANCHIER SP
STIPA SPARTEA
LIATRIS ASPERA
HELIANTHEMUM BICKNELLII
CAMPANULA ROTUNDIFOLIA
spellingShingle Cedar Creek Natural History Area
Long Term
Ecology
Successional dynamics
Primary Productivity
Disturbance Patterns
Nutrient Budgets
Nutrient Cycles
Climatic Variation
Biodiversity
Ecosystem functioning
Nitrogen limitation
Fire Frequency
Plant Competition
MISCELLANEOUS LITTER
AGROPYRON REPENS
POA PRATENSIS
PHYSALIS HETEROPHYLLA
MOSSES & LICHENS
AMBROSIA ARTEMISIIFOLIA ELATIOR
BERTEROA INCANA
HEDEOMA HISPIDA
LYCHNIS ALBA
POLYGONUM CONVOLVULUS
POLYGONUM TENUE
SCHIZACHYRIUM SCOPARIUM
SETARIA LUTESCENS (GLAUCA)
ARISTIDA BASIRAMEA
PHYSALIS VIRGINIANA
ANDROPOGON GERARDI
PANICUM PRAECOCIOUS
ERIGERON CANADENSIS
PENSTEMON GRACILIS
SILENE ANTIRRHINA
MISCELLANEOUS HERBS
MOLLUGO VERTICILLATA
LEPIDIUM DENSIFLORUM
TRAGOPOGON DUBIUS (MAJOR)
SALSOLA KALI
TRADESCANTIA OCCIDENTALIS
EUPHORBIA GLYPTOSPERMA
RUDBECKIA SEROTINA
HIERACIUM LONGIPILUM
ERAGROSTIS SPECTABILIS
PANICUM OLIGOSANTHES
ACHILLEA MILLEFOLIUM(LANULOSA)
SOLIDAGO NEMORALIS
POLYGALA POLYGAMA
ASCLEPIAS SYRIACA
PINUS STROBUS
CYPERUS SP
CYPERUS FILICULMIS
CAREX SP
CHENOPODIUM ALBUM
OENOTHERA BIENNIS
PHALARIS ARUNDINACEA
ARTEMISIA LUDOVICIANA
RUBUS SP
AMBROSIA CORONOPIFOLIA
EUPHORBIA COROLLATA
ARABIS DIVARICARPA
ROSA ARKANSANA
SORGHASTRUM NUTANS
OXYBAPHUS HIRSUTUS
LESPEDEZA CAPITATA
SOLIDAGO RIGIDA
PANICUM PERLONGUM
LATHYRUS VENOSUS
URTICA DIOICA
LITHOSPERMUM CANESCENS
EQUISETUM LAEVIGATUM
ASTER AZUREUS
VIOLA PEDATIFIDA
ASCLEPIAS TUBEROSA
HIERACIUM KALMII
AMELANCHIER SP
STIPA SPARTEA
LIATRIS ASPERA
HELIANTHEMUM BICKNELLII
CAMPANULA ROTUNDIFOLIA
Long-Term Nitrogen Deposition: Effects on Succession Following Major Disturbances. Year 1990 Aboveground biomass data
topic_facet Cedar Creek Natural History Area
Long Term
Ecology
Successional dynamics
Primary Productivity
Disturbance Patterns
Nutrient Budgets
Nutrient Cycles
Climatic Variation
Biodiversity
Ecosystem functioning
Nitrogen limitation
Fire Frequency
Plant Competition
MISCELLANEOUS LITTER
AGROPYRON REPENS
POA PRATENSIS
PHYSALIS HETEROPHYLLA
MOSSES & LICHENS
AMBROSIA ARTEMISIIFOLIA ELATIOR
BERTEROA INCANA
HEDEOMA HISPIDA
LYCHNIS ALBA
POLYGONUM CONVOLVULUS
POLYGONUM TENUE
SCHIZACHYRIUM SCOPARIUM
SETARIA LUTESCENS (GLAUCA)
ARISTIDA BASIRAMEA
PHYSALIS VIRGINIANA
ANDROPOGON GERARDI
PANICUM PRAECOCIOUS
ERIGERON CANADENSIS
PENSTEMON GRACILIS
SILENE ANTIRRHINA
MISCELLANEOUS HERBS
MOLLUGO VERTICILLATA
LEPIDIUM DENSIFLORUM
TRAGOPOGON DUBIUS (MAJOR)
SALSOLA KALI
TRADESCANTIA OCCIDENTALIS
EUPHORBIA GLYPTOSPERMA
RUDBECKIA SEROTINA
HIERACIUM LONGIPILUM
ERAGROSTIS SPECTABILIS
PANICUM OLIGOSANTHES
ACHILLEA MILLEFOLIUM(LANULOSA)
SOLIDAGO NEMORALIS
POLYGALA POLYGAMA
ASCLEPIAS SYRIACA
PINUS STROBUS
CYPERUS SP
CYPERUS FILICULMIS
CAREX SP
CHENOPODIUM ALBUM
OENOTHERA BIENNIS
PHALARIS ARUNDINACEA
ARTEMISIA LUDOVICIANA
RUBUS SP
AMBROSIA CORONOPIFOLIA
EUPHORBIA COROLLATA
ARABIS DIVARICARPA
ROSA ARKANSANA
SORGHASTRUM NUTANS
OXYBAPHUS HIRSUTUS
LESPEDEZA CAPITATA
SOLIDAGO RIGIDA
PANICUM PERLONGUM
LATHYRUS VENOSUS
URTICA DIOICA
LITHOSPERMUM CANESCENS
EQUISETUM LAEVIGATUM
ASTER AZUREUS
VIOLA PEDATIFIDA
ASCLEPIAS TUBEROSA
HIERACIUM KALMII
AMELANCHIER SP
STIPA SPARTEA
LIATRIS ASPERA
HELIANTHEMUM BICKNELLII
CAMPANULA ROTUNDIFOLIA
description The purpose of this experiment is to measure how initially disturbing an area and adding nitrogen over a long time will affect the number of species, the type of species present, the amount of annual growth, and the change from year to year in the growth of each species in a plant community which is also relieved of grazing by large and small mammals. This experiment is conducted within fields (A, B, and C) which were initially low in soil nutrients. The ground was disturbed by thoroughly disking the area prior to establishment of the experiment. There are 8 different levels of nitrogen addition with other nutrients added to ensure that nitrogen remains the limiting nutrient, and a control which receives no nutrients. Nitrogen fertilizer (NH4NO3) is applied twice per year, once in early May and once in late June. There are six replicates of each treatment per field. The treatments were randomly assigned to plots of size 4 by 4 meters. The plots are in 6 plot by 9 plot grids with 1 meter aisles between plots. The plot grids are enclosed by a fence to keep out mammalian herbivores. Gophers are trapped and removed as they appear. In the spring of 1992, subexperiments E097 and E098 were established. E097 is in fields A and C where randomly selected plots within each treatment no longer receive fertilizer. E098 is in field B where randomly selected plots within each treatment are burned. Note that the design of E002 is similar to E001 except E002 was thoroughly disked prior to establishment.
format Dataset
title Long-Term Nitrogen Deposition: Effects on Succession Following Major Disturbances. Year 1990 Aboveground biomass data
title_short Long-Term Nitrogen Deposition: Effects on Succession Following Major Disturbances. Year 1990 Aboveground biomass data
title_full Long-Term Nitrogen Deposition: Effects on Succession Following Major Disturbances. Year 1990 Aboveground biomass data
title_fullStr Long-Term Nitrogen Deposition: Effects on Succession Following Major Disturbances. Year 1990 Aboveground biomass data
title_full_unstemmed Long-Term Nitrogen Deposition: Effects on Succession Following Major Disturbances. Year 1990 Aboveground biomass data
title_sort long-term nitrogen deposition: effects on succession following major disturbances. year 1990 aboveground biomass data
publishDate 1992
url http://hdl.handle.net/10255/dryad.11151
http://metacat.lternet.edu/knb/metacat/knb-lter-cdr.799002.2/xml
op_coverage The Cedar Creek Natural History Area is located in Anoka and Isanti counties, approximately 30 miles north of Saint Paul, MN. CCNHA lies at the boundary between prairie and forest. It is a mosaic of uplands dominated by oak savanna, prairie, hardwood forest, pine forests,and abandoned agricultural fields and of lowlands comprised of ash and cedar swamps, acid bogs, marshes, and sedge meadows. Large tracts of the pre-agricultural ecosystems of the region are preserved within its boundaries, as is a successional chronosequence of more than 80 old fields of known history.
-93.22445 W -93.16289 E 45.44138 N 45.384865 S
1990
1990
long_lat ENVELOPE(-57.715,-57.715,51.467,51.467)
ENVELOPE(144.648,144.648,59.871,59.871)
ENVELOPE(-129.954,-129.954,54.598,54.598)
geographic Saint-Paul
Kali
Cedar Creek
geographic_facet Saint-Paul
Kali
Cedar Creek
genre Campanula rotundifolia
genre_facet Campanula rotundifolia
op_relation http://metacat.lternet.edu/knb/metacat/knb-lter-cdr.799002.2/xml
knb-lter-cdr.799002.2
http://hdl.handle.net/10255/dryad.11151
op_rights Code of Ethics and Rules for Use of Cedar Creek LTER and Related DataAs a condition for access to data provided by researchers of the Cedar Creek LTER, I, the data user, agrees to abide by the following code of ethics.I agree to notify the Cedar Creek LTER scientists who gathered data if I would like to use those data in any publication. I acknowledge that these data were gathered by Cedar Creek scientists because they had already perceived the importance of these data for a variety of scientific and societal issues. I will provide them with formal recognition that, at their discretion, may include co-authorship or acknowledgements on publications. I realize that the researchers who gathered these data may be using them for scientific analyses, papers or publications that are currently planned or in preparation, and that such activities have precedence over any that I might wish to prepare. In this case, my preparation of any work may be delayed, at the option of the Cedar Creek researchers involved, until their work is completed. Because it may be possible to misinterpret a data set if it is taken out of context, I will seek the assistance and opinion of those Cedar Creek researchers involved in the design of a study and the collection of the data as I analyze the data. Moreover, I realize that this computer data set is not complete, and it may contain errors. The complete data set includes extensive written documentation, which should be referenced to reduce the chance of errors in data and errors of interpretation.
_version_ 1766383851979931648
spelling ftdryad:oai:v1.datadryad.org:10255/dryad.11151 2023-05-15T15:48:44+02:00 Long-Term Nitrogen Deposition: Effects on Succession Following Major Disturbances. Year 1990 Aboveground biomass data The Cedar Creek Natural History Area is located in Anoka and Isanti counties, approximately 30 miles north of Saint Paul, MN. CCNHA lies at the boundary between prairie and forest. It is a mosaic of uplands dominated by oak savanna, prairie, hardwood forest, pine forests,and abandoned agricultural fields and of lowlands comprised of ash and cedar swamps, acid bogs, marshes, and sedge meadows. Large tracts of the pre-agricultural ecosystems of the region are preserved within its boundaries, as is a successional chronosequence of more than 80 old fields of known history. -93.22445 W -93.16289 E 45.44138 N 45.384865 S 1990 1990 1992 text/plain http://hdl.handle.net/10255/dryad.11151 http://metacat.lternet.edu/knb/metacat/knb-lter-cdr.799002.2/xml unknown http://metacat.lternet.edu/knb/metacat/knb-lter-cdr.799002.2/xml knb-lter-cdr.799002.2 http://hdl.handle.net/10255/dryad.11151 Code of Ethics and Rules for Use of Cedar Creek LTER and Related DataAs a condition for access to data provided by researchers of the Cedar Creek LTER, I, the data user, agrees to abide by the following code of ethics.I agree to notify the Cedar Creek LTER scientists who gathered data if I would like to use those data in any publication. I acknowledge that these data were gathered by Cedar Creek scientists because they had already perceived the importance of these data for a variety of scientific and societal issues. I will provide them with formal recognition that, at their discretion, may include co-authorship or acknowledgements on publications. I realize that the researchers who gathered these data may be using them for scientific analyses, papers or publications that are currently planned or in preparation, and that such activities have precedence over any that I might wish to prepare. In this case, my preparation of any work may be delayed, at the option of the Cedar Creek researchers involved, until their work is completed. Because it may be possible to misinterpret a data set if it is taken out of context, I will seek the assistance and opinion of those Cedar Creek researchers involved in the design of a study and the collection of the data as I analyze the data. Moreover, I realize that this computer data set is not complete, and it may contain errors. The complete data set includes extensive written documentation, which should be referenced to reduce the chance of errors in data and errors of interpretation. Cedar Creek Natural History Area Long Term Ecology Successional dynamics Primary Productivity Disturbance Patterns Nutrient Budgets Nutrient Cycles Climatic Variation Biodiversity Ecosystem functioning Nitrogen limitation Fire Frequency Plant Competition MISCELLANEOUS LITTER AGROPYRON REPENS POA PRATENSIS PHYSALIS HETEROPHYLLA MOSSES & LICHENS AMBROSIA ARTEMISIIFOLIA ELATIOR BERTEROA INCANA HEDEOMA HISPIDA LYCHNIS ALBA POLYGONUM CONVOLVULUS POLYGONUM TENUE SCHIZACHYRIUM SCOPARIUM SETARIA LUTESCENS (GLAUCA) ARISTIDA BASIRAMEA PHYSALIS VIRGINIANA ANDROPOGON GERARDI PANICUM PRAECOCIOUS ERIGERON CANADENSIS PENSTEMON GRACILIS SILENE ANTIRRHINA MISCELLANEOUS HERBS MOLLUGO VERTICILLATA LEPIDIUM DENSIFLORUM TRAGOPOGON DUBIUS (MAJOR) SALSOLA KALI TRADESCANTIA OCCIDENTALIS EUPHORBIA GLYPTOSPERMA RUDBECKIA SEROTINA HIERACIUM LONGIPILUM ERAGROSTIS SPECTABILIS PANICUM OLIGOSANTHES ACHILLEA MILLEFOLIUM(LANULOSA) SOLIDAGO NEMORALIS POLYGALA POLYGAMA ASCLEPIAS SYRIACA PINUS STROBUS CYPERUS SP CYPERUS FILICULMIS CAREX SP CHENOPODIUM ALBUM OENOTHERA BIENNIS PHALARIS ARUNDINACEA ARTEMISIA LUDOVICIANA RUBUS SP AMBROSIA CORONOPIFOLIA EUPHORBIA COROLLATA ARABIS DIVARICARPA ROSA ARKANSANA SORGHASTRUM NUTANS OXYBAPHUS HIRSUTUS LESPEDEZA CAPITATA SOLIDAGO RIGIDA PANICUM PERLONGUM LATHYRUS VENOSUS URTICA DIOICA LITHOSPERMUM CANESCENS EQUISETUM LAEVIGATUM ASTER AZUREUS VIOLA PEDATIFIDA ASCLEPIAS TUBEROSA HIERACIUM KALMII AMELANCHIER SP STIPA SPARTEA LIATRIS ASPERA HELIANTHEMUM BICKNELLII CAMPANULA ROTUNDIFOLIA dataset 1992 ftdryad 2020-01-01T14:24:48Z The purpose of this experiment is to measure how initially disturbing an area and adding nitrogen over a long time will affect the number of species, the type of species present, the amount of annual growth, and the change from year to year in the growth of each species in a plant community which is also relieved of grazing by large and small mammals. This experiment is conducted within fields (A, B, and C) which were initially low in soil nutrients. The ground was disturbed by thoroughly disking the area prior to establishment of the experiment. There are 8 different levels of nitrogen addition with other nutrients added to ensure that nitrogen remains the limiting nutrient, and a control which receives no nutrients. Nitrogen fertilizer (NH4NO3) is applied twice per year, once in early May and once in late June. There are six replicates of each treatment per field. The treatments were randomly assigned to plots of size 4 by 4 meters. The plots are in 6 plot by 9 plot grids with 1 meter aisles between plots. The plot grids are enclosed by a fence to keep out mammalian herbivores. Gophers are trapped and removed as they appear. In the spring of 1992, subexperiments E097 and E098 were established. E097 is in fields A and C where randomly selected plots within each treatment no longer receive fertilizer. E098 is in field B where randomly selected plots within each treatment are burned. Note that the design of E002 is similar to E001 except E002 was thoroughly disked prior to establishment. Dataset Campanula rotundifolia Dryad Digital Repository (Duke University) Saint-Paul ENVELOPE(-57.715,-57.715,51.467,51.467) Kali ENVELOPE(144.648,144.648,59.871,59.871) Cedar Creek ENVELOPE(-129.954,-129.954,54.598,54.598)