Effect of Brine Composition on CO2/Limestone Rock Interactions during CO2 Sequestration

Several parameters affect the chemical reactions between CO2/fluid/rock: pressure, temperature, rock type, and brine composition. Brine composition includes salt concentration and type. Pink Desert limestone cores were used to conduct a series of coreflood experiments to address the effect of brine...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ibrahim Mohamed, Jia He;Hisham A. Nasr-El-Din;
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Journal of Petroleum Science Research
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.dpi-journals.com/index.php/JPSR/article/view/982
id ftdpipublojs:oai:ojs.dpi-journals.com:article/982
record_format openpolar
spelling ftdpipublojs:oai:ojs.dpi-journals.com:article/982 2023-05-15T15:52:51+02:00 Effect of Brine Composition on CO2/Limestone Rock Interactions during CO2 Sequestration Ibrahim Mohamed, Jia He;Hisham A. Nasr-El-Din; application/pdf http://www.dpi-journals.com/index.php/JPSR/article/view/982 eng eng Journal of Petroleum Science Research http://www.dpi-journals.com/index.php/JPSR/article/view/982/850 Copyright (c) 2015 Journal of Petroleum Science Research Journal of Petroleum Science Research; Volume 2 Issue 1 (January 2013) 2168-5533 2168-5517 CO2 Sequestration; Coreflood Experiments; CO2 Injection Modeling; CO2/Brine/Rock Chemical Reactions info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Peer-reviewed Article ftdpipublojs 2018-01-16T08:18:04Z Several parameters affect the chemical reactions between CO2/fluid/rock: pressure, temperature, rock type, and brine composition. Brine composition includes salt concentration and type. Pink Desert limestone cores were used to conduct a series of coreflood experiments to address the effect of brine composition on the chemical reactions between carbonic acid and limestone rock. The experiments were designed to simulate the water alternating gas (WAG) injection of CO2 into saline carbonate aquifers. Supercritical CO2 and brines were injected at flow rates of 2 and 5 cm3/min at 70 and 200°F. Seawater, formation brine, calcium chloride, sodium chloride, and magnesium chloride brines were used in this study. A commercial compositional simulator was used to simulate the coreflood experiments at the lab conditions. The reaction rate constant of CO2 with calcite at different brine compositions was adjusted to match the calcium concentration obtained in the lab. Experimental data was used to predict the reaction rate constant between CO2/brine/rock and found to be increasing as the brine salinity increased (Log(k25)= -9.2) when CO2 dissolves in DI water, and -6.2 when CO2 dissolves in 5 wt% CaCl2 brine). A simulation study conducted on field scale showed that after 30 years of CO2 injection and 1400 years after injection stopped, brine composition does not affect the trapping mechanism of CO2 in the aquifer. Article in Journal/Newspaper Carbonic acid DPI Journals (Destech Publications)
institution Open Polar
collection DPI Journals (Destech Publications)
op_collection_id ftdpipublojs
language English
topic CO2 Sequestration; Coreflood Experiments; CO2 Injection Modeling; CO2/Brine/Rock Chemical Reactions
spellingShingle CO2 Sequestration; Coreflood Experiments; CO2 Injection Modeling; CO2/Brine/Rock Chemical Reactions
Ibrahim Mohamed,
Jia He;Hisham A. Nasr-El-Din;
Effect of Brine Composition on CO2/Limestone Rock Interactions during CO2 Sequestration
topic_facet CO2 Sequestration; Coreflood Experiments; CO2 Injection Modeling; CO2/Brine/Rock Chemical Reactions
description Several parameters affect the chemical reactions between CO2/fluid/rock: pressure, temperature, rock type, and brine composition. Brine composition includes salt concentration and type. Pink Desert limestone cores were used to conduct a series of coreflood experiments to address the effect of brine composition on the chemical reactions between carbonic acid and limestone rock. The experiments were designed to simulate the water alternating gas (WAG) injection of CO2 into saline carbonate aquifers. Supercritical CO2 and brines were injected at flow rates of 2 and 5 cm3/min at 70 and 200°F. Seawater, formation brine, calcium chloride, sodium chloride, and magnesium chloride brines were used in this study. A commercial compositional simulator was used to simulate the coreflood experiments at the lab conditions. The reaction rate constant of CO2 with calcite at different brine compositions was adjusted to match the calcium concentration obtained in the lab. Experimental data was used to predict the reaction rate constant between CO2/brine/rock and found to be increasing as the brine salinity increased (Log(k25)= -9.2) when CO2 dissolves in DI water, and -6.2 when CO2 dissolves in 5 wt% CaCl2 brine). A simulation study conducted on field scale showed that after 30 years of CO2 injection and 1400 years after injection stopped, brine composition does not affect the trapping mechanism of CO2 in the aquifer.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Ibrahim Mohamed,
Jia He;Hisham A. Nasr-El-Din;
author_facet Ibrahim Mohamed,
Jia He;Hisham A. Nasr-El-Din;
author_sort Ibrahim Mohamed,
title Effect of Brine Composition on CO2/Limestone Rock Interactions during CO2 Sequestration
title_short Effect of Brine Composition on CO2/Limestone Rock Interactions during CO2 Sequestration
title_full Effect of Brine Composition on CO2/Limestone Rock Interactions during CO2 Sequestration
title_fullStr Effect of Brine Composition on CO2/Limestone Rock Interactions during CO2 Sequestration
title_full_unstemmed Effect of Brine Composition on CO2/Limestone Rock Interactions during CO2 Sequestration
title_sort effect of brine composition on co2/limestone rock interactions during co2 sequestration
publisher Journal of Petroleum Science Research
url http://www.dpi-journals.com/index.php/JPSR/article/view/982
genre Carbonic acid
genre_facet Carbonic acid
op_source Journal of Petroleum Science Research; Volume 2 Issue 1 (January 2013)
2168-5533
2168-5517
op_relation http://www.dpi-journals.com/index.php/JPSR/article/view/982/850
op_rights Copyright (c) 2015 Journal of Petroleum Science Research
_version_ 1766387956720861184