Anesthesia for Cesarean Section: Retrospective Comparative Study
Naser Al-Husban,1 Mohammad Sami Elmuhtaseb,1 Hedaieh Al-Husban,2 Mohammed Nabhan,3 Hamza Abuhalaweh,3 Yasmine Mohamed Alkhatib,3 Maysa Yousef,3 Bayan Aloran,3 Yousef Elyyan,3 Asma Alghazo3 1Faculty of Medicine, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan; 2Al-Noor Fertility Center, Eye Specialty Hospita...
Published in: | International Journal of Women's Health |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Dove Press
2021
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.dovepress.com/anesthesia-for-cesarean-section-retrospective-comparative-study-peer-reviewed-fulltext-article-IJWH |
_version_ | 1821700348347154432 |
---|---|
author | Al-Husban,Naser Elmuhtaseb,Mohammad Sami Al-Husban,Hedaieh Nabhan,Mohammed Abuhalaweh,Hamza Alkhatib,Yasmine Mohamed Yousef,Maysa Aloran,Bayan Elyyan,Yousef Alghazo,Asma |
author_facet | Al-Husban,Naser Elmuhtaseb,Mohammad Sami Al-Husban,Hedaieh Nabhan,Mohammed Abuhalaweh,Hamza Alkhatib,Yasmine Mohamed Yousef,Maysa Aloran,Bayan Elyyan,Yousef Alghazo,Asma |
author_sort | Al-Husban,Naser |
collection | Dove Medical Press |
container_start_page | 141 |
container_title | International Journal of Women's Health |
container_volume | Volume 13 |
description | Naser Al-Husban,1 Mohammad Sami Elmuhtaseb,1 Hedaieh Al-Husban,2 Mohammed Nabhan,3 Hamza Abuhalaweh,3 Yasmine Mohamed Alkhatib,3 Maysa Yousef,3 Bayan Aloran,3 Yousef Elyyan,3 Asma Alghazo3 1Faculty of Medicine, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan; 2Al-Noor Fertility Center, Eye Specialty Hospital, Amman, Jordan; 3Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, Jordan University Hospital, Amman, JordanCorrespondence: Naser Al-HusbanFaculty of Medicine, The University of Jordan, P O Box 2194, Amman, 11941, JordanTel +962-772086080Fax +96264643217Email Husban48@yahoo.comBackground: Cesarean section is a widely performed surgery.Objective: To compare anesthetic types regarding feto-maternal outcomes.Materials and Methods: Retrospective comparative study of 3599 cesarean sections (emergency and elective categories).Results: Mean APGAR score was statistically higher in the spinal than general anesthesia among the emergency category, P = 0.000 and 0.026, respectively, with no significant difference in the elective category. Estimated blood loss among the elective category was statistically significantly higher in the spinal than general anesthesia, P = 0.001. However, among the emergency category, it was significantly higher in the general than in spinal or epidural anesthesia, P = 0.000. Diclofenac sodium was used more after spinal than general anesthesia (P = 0.000), with no significant difference between epidural and general or between epidural and spinal anesthesia. Pethidine hydrochloride (HCL) was used more after general than after spinal anesthesia (P = 0.000). However, pethidine HCL use was not statistically significantly different between spinal and epidural anesthesia. In the elective category, paracetamol was requested more after spinal than epidural or general anesthesia, P = 0.000. No significant difference was seen between epidural and general anesthesia, P = 1.000. No statistically significant difference was found among the anesthetic types in both categories regarding tramadol HCL. Length of hospital stay, ... |
format | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
genre | sami |
genre_facet | sami |
id | ftdovepress:oai:dovepress.com/61659 |
institution | Open Polar |
language | English |
op_collection_id | ftdovepress |
op_container_end_page | 152 |
op_doi | https://doi.org/10.2147/IJWH.S292434 |
op_relation | info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.2147/IJWH.S292434 https://www.dovepress.com/anesthesia-for-cesarean-section-retrospective-comparative-study-peer-reviewed-fulltext-article-IJWH |
op_rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Dove Press |
record_format | openpolar |
spelling | ftdovepress:oai:dovepress.com/61659 2025-01-17T00:37:51+00:00 Anesthesia for Cesarean Section: Retrospective Comparative Study Al-Husban,Naser Elmuhtaseb,Mohammad Sami Al-Husban,Hedaieh Nabhan,Mohammed Abuhalaweh,Hamza Alkhatib,Yasmine Mohamed Yousef,Maysa Aloran,Bayan Elyyan,Yousef Alghazo,Asma 2021-02-02 text/html https://www.dovepress.com/anesthesia-for-cesarean-section-retrospective-comparative-study-peer-reviewed-fulltext-article-IJWH en eng Dove Press info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.2147/IJWH.S292434 https://www.dovepress.com/anesthesia-for-cesarean-section-retrospective-comparative-study-peer-reviewed-fulltext-article-IJWH info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess International Journal of Women's Health Original Research info:eu-repo/semantics/article 2021 ftdovepress https://doi.org/10.2147/IJWH.S292434 2022-12-27T23:05:19Z Naser Al-Husban,1 Mohammad Sami Elmuhtaseb,1 Hedaieh Al-Husban,2 Mohammed Nabhan,3 Hamza Abuhalaweh,3 Yasmine Mohamed Alkhatib,3 Maysa Yousef,3 Bayan Aloran,3 Yousef Elyyan,3 Asma Alghazo3 1Faculty of Medicine, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan; 2Al-Noor Fertility Center, Eye Specialty Hospital, Amman, Jordan; 3Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, Jordan University Hospital, Amman, JordanCorrespondence: Naser Al-HusbanFaculty of Medicine, The University of Jordan, P O Box 2194, Amman, 11941, JordanTel +962-772086080Fax +96264643217Email Husban48@yahoo.comBackground: Cesarean section is a widely performed surgery.Objective: To compare anesthetic types regarding feto-maternal outcomes.Materials and Methods: Retrospective comparative study of 3599 cesarean sections (emergency and elective categories).Results: Mean APGAR score was statistically higher in the spinal than general anesthesia among the emergency category, P = 0.000 and 0.026, respectively, with no significant difference in the elective category. Estimated blood loss among the elective category was statistically significantly higher in the spinal than general anesthesia, P = 0.001. However, among the emergency category, it was significantly higher in the general than in spinal or epidural anesthesia, P = 0.000. Diclofenac sodium was used more after spinal than general anesthesia (P = 0.000), with no significant difference between epidural and general or between epidural and spinal anesthesia. Pethidine hydrochloride (HCL) was used more after general than after spinal anesthesia (P = 0.000). However, pethidine HCL use was not statistically significantly different between spinal and epidural anesthesia. In the elective category, paracetamol was requested more after spinal than epidural or general anesthesia, P = 0.000. No significant difference was seen between epidural and general anesthesia, P = 1.000. No statistically significant difference was found among the anesthetic types in both categories regarding tramadol HCL. Length of hospital stay, ... Article in Journal/Newspaper sami Dove Medical Press International Journal of Women's Health Volume 13 141 152 |
spellingShingle | International Journal of Women's Health Al-Husban,Naser Elmuhtaseb,Mohammad Sami Al-Husban,Hedaieh Nabhan,Mohammed Abuhalaweh,Hamza Alkhatib,Yasmine Mohamed Yousef,Maysa Aloran,Bayan Elyyan,Yousef Alghazo,Asma Anesthesia for Cesarean Section: Retrospective Comparative Study |
title | Anesthesia for Cesarean Section: Retrospective Comparative Study |
title_full | Anesthesia for Cesarean Section: Retrospective Comparative Study |
title_fullStr | Anesthesia for Cesarean Section: Retrospective Comparative Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Anesthesia for Cesarean Section: Retrospective Comparative Study |
title_short | Anesthesia for Cesarean Section: Retrospective Comparative Study |
title_sort | anesthesia for cesarean section: retrospective comparative study |
topic | International Journal of Women's Health |
topic_facet | International Journal of Women's Health |
url | https://www.dovepress.com/anesthesia-for-cesarean-section-retrospective-comparative-study-peer-reviewed-fulltext-article-IJWH |