Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning Algorithms for Soil Erosion Modelling Based on Remotely Sensed Data

Recent years have seen an increase in the use of remote-sensing based methods to assess soil erosion, mainly due to the availability of freely accessible satellite data, with successful results on a consistent basis. There would be valuable benefits from applying these techniques to the Arctic areas...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Remote Sensing
Main Authors: Daniel Fernández, Eromanga Adermann, Marco Pizzolato, Roman Pechenkin, Christina G. Rodríguez, Alireza Taravat
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2023
Subjects:
Q
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15020482
https://doaj.org/article/fde8dd649dfa42b88dd87e461741029c
id ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:fde8dd649dfa42b88dd87e461741029c
record_format openpolar
spelling ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:fde8dd649dfa42b88dd87e461741029c 2023-05-15T14:57:42+02:00 Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning Algorithms for Soil Erosion Modelling Based on Remotely Sensed Data Daniel Fernández Eromanga Adermann Marco Pizzolato Roman Pechenkin Christina G. Rodríguez Alireza Taravat 2023-01-01T00:00:00Z https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15020482 https://doaj.org/article/fde8dd649dfa42b88dd87e461741029c EN eng MDPI AG https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/15/2/482 https://doaj.org/toc/2072-4292 doi:10.3390/rs15020482 2072-4292 https://doaj.org/article/fde8dd649dfa42b88dd87e461741029c Remote Sensing, Vol 15, Iss 482, p 482 (2023) soil erosion Sentinel-2 remote sensing machine learning support vector machine random forest Science Q article 2023 ftdoajarticles https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15020482 2023-01-22T01:26:17Z Recent years have seen an increase in the use of remote-sensing based methods to assess soil erosion, mainly due to the availability of freely accessible satellite data, with successful results on a consistent basis. There would be valuable benefits from applying these techniques to the Arctic areas, where ground local studies are typically difficult to perform due to hardly accessible roads and lands. At the same time, however, the application of remote-sensing methods comes with its own set of challenges when it comes to the peculiar features of the Arctic: short growing periods, winter storms, wind, and frequent cloud and snow cover. In this study we perform a comparative analysis of three commonly used classification algorithms: Support Vector Machine (SVM), Random Forest (RF) and Multilayer Perceptron (MLP), in combination with ground truth samples from regions all over Iceland, provided by Iceland’s Soil Conservation Service department. The process can be automated to predict soil erosion risk for larger, less accessible areas from Sentinel-2 images. The analysis performed on validation data sets supports the effectiveness of both approaches for modeling soil erosion, albeit differences are highlighted. Article in Journal/Newspaper Arctic Iceland Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles Arctic Remote Sensing 15 2 482
institution Open Polar
collection Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles
op_collection_id ftdoajarticles
language English
topic soil erosion
Sentinel-2
remote sensing
machine learning
support vector machine
random forest
Science
Q
spellingShingle soil erosion
Sentinel-2
remote sensing
machine learning
support vector machine
random forest
Science
Q
Daniel Fernández
Eromanga Adermann
Marco Pizzolato
Roman Pechenkin
Christina G. Rodríguez
Alireza Taravat
Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning Algorithms for Soil Erosion Modelling Based on Remotely Sensed Data
topic_facet soil erosion
Sentinel-2
remote sensing
machine learning
support vector machine
random forest
Science
Q
description Recent years have seen an increase in the use of remote-sensing based methods to assess soil erosion, mainly due to the availability of freely accessible satellite data, with successful results on a consistent basis. There would be valuable benefits from applying these techniques to the Arctic areas, where ground local studies are typically difficult to perform due to hardly accessible roads and lands. At the same time, however, the application of remote-sensing methods comes with its own set of challenges when it comes to the peculiar features of the Arctic: short growing periods, winter storms, wind, and frequent cloud and snow cover. In this study we perform a comparative analysis of three commonly used classification algorithms: Support Vector Machine (SVM), Random Forest (RF) and Multilayer Perceptron (MLP), in combination with ground truth samples from regions all over Iceland, provided by Iceland’s Soil Conservation Service department. The process can be automated to predict soil erosion risk for larger, less accessible areas from Sentinel-2 images. The analysis performed on validation data sets supports the effectiveness of both approaches for modeling soil erosion, albeit differences are highlighted.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Daniel Fernández
Eromanga Adermann
Marco Pizzolato
Roman Pechenkin
Christina G. Rodríguez
Alireza Taravat
author_facet Daniel Fernández
Eromanga Adermann
Marco Pizzolato
Roman Pechenkin
Christina G. Rodríguez
Alireza Taravat
author_sort Daniel Fernández
title Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning Algorithms for Soil Erosion Modelling Based on Remotely Sensed Data
title_short Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning Algorithms for Soil Erosion Modelling Based on Remotely Sensed Data
title_full Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning Algorithms for Soil Erosion Modelling Based on Remotely Sensed Data
title_fullStr Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning Algorithms for Soil Erosion Modelling Based on Remotely Sensed Data
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning Algorithms for Soil Erosion Modelling Based on Remotely Sensed Data
title_sort comparative analysis of machine learning algorithms for soil erosion modelling based on remotely sensed data
publisher MDPI AG
publishDate 2023
url https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15020482
https://doaj.org/article/fde8dd649dfa42b88dd87e461741029c
geographic Arctic
geographic_facet Arctic
genre Arctic
Iceland
genre_facet Arctic
Iceland
op_source Remote Sensing, Vol 15, Iss 482, p 482 (2023)
op_relation https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/15/2/482
https://doaj.org/toc/2072-4292
doi:10.3390/rs15020482
2072-4292
https://doaj.org/article/fde8dd649dfa42b88dd87e461741029c
op_doi https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15020482
container_title Remote Sensing
container_volume 15
container_issue 2
container_start_page 482
_version_ 1766329836041666560