Isolation, characterization and comparison of Atlantic and Chinook salmon growth hormone 1 and 2

• Published in: BMC Genomics
• Main Authors: Davidson William S, Robb Adrienne, Beetz-Sargent Marianne R, Straub Christopher A, Goh Benjamin, Lubieniecki Krzysztof P, de Boer Johan, Yazawa Ryosuke, von Schalburg Kristian R, Devlin Robert H, Koop Ben F
• Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
• Language: English
• Published: BMC 2008
• Subjects: Biotechnology; TP248.13-248.65; Genetics; QH426-470; Salmo salar
• Online Access: https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-9-522; https://doaj.org/article/fb9926de4c734cb0a5fe84da32dfce01

Abstract Background Growth hormone (GH) is an important regulator of skeletal growth, as well as other adapted processes in salmonids. The GH gene ( gh ) in salmonids is represented by duplicated, non-allelic isoforms designated as gh1 and gh2 . We have isolated and characterized gh -containing bacterial artificial chromosomes (BACs) of both Atlantic and Chinook salmon ( Salmo salar and Oncorhynchus tshawytscha ) in order to further elucidate our understanding of the conservation and regulation of these loci. Results BACs containing gh1 and gh2 from both Atlantic and Chinook salmon were assembled, annotated, and compared to each other in their coding, intronic, regulatory, and flanking regions. These BACs also contain the genes for skeletal muscle sodium channel oriented in the same direction. The sequences of the genes for interferon alpha-1, myosin alkali light chain and microtubule associated protein Tau were also identified, and found in opposite orientations relative to gh1 and gh2 . Viability of each of these genes was examined by PCR. We show that transposon insertions have occurred differently in the promoters of gh , within and between each species. Other differences within the promoters and intronic and 3'-flanking regions of the four gh genes provide evidence that they have distinct regulatory modes and possibly act to function differently and/or during different times of salmonid development. Conclusion A core proximal promoter for transcription of both gh1 and gh2 is conserved between the two species of salmon. Nevertheless, transposon integration and regulatory element differences do exist between the promoters of gh1 and gh2 . Additionally, organization of transposon families into the BACs containing gh1 and for the BACs containing gh2 , are very similar within orthologous regions, but much less clear conservation is apparent in comparisons between the gh1 - and gh2 -containing paralogous BACs for the two fish species. This is consistent with the hypothesis that a burst of transposition activity ...