What is Benefit Sharing? Respecting Indigenous Rights and Addressing Inequities in Arctic Resource Projects

International standards refer to Indigenous peoples’ right to benefit from resource development, participate in decision-making and determine priorities in development planning that directly affects them. While good practice exists in benefit sharing, Indigenous peoples still lack opportunities for...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Resources
Main Author: Emma Wilson
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2019
Subjects:
Q
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.3390/resources8020074
https://doaj.org/article/fa4cdcc4b4624a9ba32644899adb2f27
id ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:fa4cdcc4b4624a9ba32644899adb2f27
record_format openpolar
spelling ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:fa4cdcc4b4624a9ba32644899adb2f27 2023-05-15T14:48:11+02:00 What is Benefit Sharing? Respecting Indigenous Rights and Addressing Inequities in Arctic Resource Projects Emma Wilson 2019-04-01T00:00:00Z https://doi.org/10.3390/resources8020074 https://doaj.org/article/fa4cdcc4b4624a9ba32644899adb2f27 EN eng MDPI AG https://www.mdpi.com/2079-9276/8/2/74 https://doaj.org/toc/2079-9276 2079-9276 doi:10.3390/resources8020074 https://doaj.org/article/fa4cdcc4b4624a9ba32644899adb2f27 Resources, Vol 8, Iss 2, p 74 (2019) arctic Indigenous extractive industries international standards benefit sharing equity strategic planning Science Q article 2019 ftdoajarticles https://doi.org/10.3390/resources8020074 2022-12-30T20:46:02Z International standards refer to Indigenous peoples’ right to benefit from resource development, participate in decision-making and determine priorities in development planning that directly affects them. While good practice exists in benefit sharing, Indigenous peoples still lack opportunities for a meaningful role in strategic planning. In his role as UN Special Rapporteur on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, James Anaya identified a ‘preferred model’ of resource development in which Indigenous peoples have greater control over planning decisions and project implementation, and consequently a more meaningful share of the benefits of resource development. This paper explores the requirements of international standards and guidance alongside different models of benefit sharing in practice by extractive industries in Arctic and sub-Arctic contexts. It is based primarily on desk-based analysis of international hard and soft law and industry standards, while also drawing on ethnographic field research in Russia and Norway. It highlights good practice within mainstream development scenarios and identifies models of benefit sharing that represent a greater degree of Indigenous participation and control. It concludes that there is a need to consider benefit sharing within an overall paradigm that allows greater space for Indigenous voices in decision making, including at the strategic planning stage. Article in Journal/Newspaper Arctic Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles Arctic Norway Resources 8 2 74
institution Open Polar
collection Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles
op_collection_id ftdoajarticles
language English
topic arctic
Indigenous
extractive industries
international standards
benefit sharing
equity
strategic planning
Science
Q
spellingShingle arctic
Indigenous
extractive industries
international standards
benefit sharing
equity
strategic planning
Science
Q
Emma Wilson
What is Benefit Sharing? Respecting Indigenous Rights and Addressing Inequities in Arctic Resource Projects
topic_facet arctic
Indigenous
extractive industries
international standards
benefit sharing
equity
strategic planning
Science
Q
description International standards refer to Indigenous peoples’ right to benefit from resource development, participate in decision-making and determine priorities in development planning that directly affects them. While good practice exists in benefit sharing, Indigenous peoples still lack opportunities for a meaningful role in strategic planning. In his role as UN Special Rapporteur on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, James Anaya identified a ‘preferred model’ of resource development in which Indigenous peoples have greater control over planning decisions and project implementation, and consequently a more meaningful share of the benefits of resource development. This paper explores the requirements of international standards and guidance alongside different models of benefit sharing in practice by extractive industries in Arctic and sub-Arctic contexts. It is based primarily on desk-based analysis of international hard and soft law and industry standards, while also drawing on ethnographic field research in Russia and Norway. It highlights good practice within mainstream development scenarios and identifies models of benefit sharing that represent a greater degree of Indigenous participation and control. It concludes that there is a need to consider benefit sharing within an overall paradigm that allows greater space for Indigenous voices in decision making, including at the strategic planning stage.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Emma Wilson
author_facet Emma Wilson
author_sort Emma Wilson
title What is Benefit Sharing? Respecting Indigenous Rights and Addressing Inequities in Arctic Resource Projects
title_short What is Benefit Sharing? Respecting Indigenous Rights and Addressing Inequities in Arctic Resource Projects
title_full What is Benefit Sharing? Respecting Indigenous Rights and Addressing Inequities in Arctic Resource Projects
title_fullStr What is Benefit Sharing? Respecting Indigenous Rights and Addressing Inequities in Arctic Resource Projects
title_full_unstemmed What is Benefit Sharing? Respecting Indigenous Rights and Addressing Inequities in Arctic Resource Projects
title_sort what is benefit sharing? respecting indigenous rights and addressing inequities in arctic resource projects
publisher MDPI AG
publishDate 2019
url https://doi.org/10.3390/resources8020074
https://doaj.org/article/fa4cdcc4b4624a9ba32644899adb2f27
geographic Arctic
Norway
geographic_facet Arctic
Norway
genre Arctic
genre_facet Arctic
op_source Resources, Vol 8, Iss 2, p 74 (2019)
op_relation https://www.mdpi.com/2079-9276/8/2/74
https://doaj.org/toc/2079-9276
2079-9276
doi:10.3390/resources8020074
https://doaj.org/article/fa4cdcc4b4624a9ba32644899adb2f27
op_doi https://doi.org/10.3390/resources8020074
container_title Resources
container_volume 8
container_issue 2
container_start_page 74
_version_ 1766319276383272960