What is Benefit Sharing? Respecting Indigenous Rights and Addressing Inequities in Arctic Resource Projects
International standards refer to Indigenous peoples’ right to benefit from resource development, participate in decision-making and determine priorities in development planning that directly affects them. While good practice exists in benefit sharing, Indigenous peoples still lack opportunities for...
Published in: | Resources |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2019
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.3390/resources8020074 https://doaj.org/article/fa4cdcc4b4624a9ba32644899adb2f27 |
id |
ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:fa4cdcc4b4624a9ba32644899adb2f27 |
---|---|
record_format |
openpolar |
spelling |
ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:fa4cdcc4b4624a9ba32644899adb2f27 2023-05-15T14:48:11+02:00 What is Benefit Sharing? Respecting Indigenous Rights and Addressing Inequities in Arctic Resource Projects Emma Wilson 2019-04-01T00:00:00Z https://doi.org/10.3390/resources8020074 https://doaj.org/article/fa4cdcc4b4624a9ba32644899adb2f27 EN eng MDPI AG https://www.mdpi.com/2079-9276/8/2/74 https://doaj.org/toc/2079-9276 2079-9276 doi:10.3390/resources8020074 https://doaj.org/article/fa4cdcc4b4624a9ba32644899adb2f27 Resources, Vol 8, Iss 2, p 74 (2019) arctic Indigenous extractive industries international standards benefit sharing equity strategic planning Science Q article 2019 ftdoajarticles https://doi.org/10.3390/resources8020074 2022-12-30T20:46:02Z International standards refer to Indigenous peoples’ right to benefit from resource development, participate in decision-making and determine priorities in development planning that directly affects them. While good practice exists in benefit sharing, Indigenous peoples still lack opportunities for a meaningful role in strategic planning. In his role as UN Special Rapporteur on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, James Anaya identified a ‘preferred model’ of resource development in which Indigenous peoples have greater control over planning decisions and project implementation, and consequently a more meaningful share of the benefits of resource development. This paper explores the requirements of international standards and guidance alongside different models of benefit sharing in practice by extractive industries in Arctic and sub-Arctic contexts. It is based primarily on desk-based analysis of international hard and soft law and industry standards, while also drawing on ethnographic field research in Russia and Norway. It highlights good practice within mainstream development scenarios and identifies models of benefit sharing that represent a greater degree of Indigenous participation and control. It concludes that there is a need to consider benefit sharing within an overall paradigm that allows greater space for Indigenous voices in decision making, including at the strategic planning stage. Article in Journal/Newspaper Arctic Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles Arctic Norway Resources 8 2 74 |
institution |
Open Polar |
collection |
Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles |
op_collection_id |
ftdoajarticles |
language |
English |
topic |
arctic Indigenous extractive industries international standards benefit sharing equity strategic planning Science Q |
spellingShingle |
arctic Indigenous extractive industries international standards benefit sharing equity strategic planning Science Q Emma Wilson What is Benefit Sharing? Respecting Indigenous Rights and Addressing Inequities in Arctic Resource Projects |
topic_facet |
arctic Indigenous extractive industries international standards benefit sharing equity strategic planning Science Q |
description |
International standards refer to Indigenous peoples’ right to benefit from resource development, participate in decision-making and determine priorities in development planning that directly affects them. While good practice exists in benefit sharing, Indigenous peoples still lack opportunities for a meaningful role in strategic planning. In his role as UN Special Rapporteur on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, James Anaya identified a ‘preferred model’ of resource development in which Indigenous peoples have greater control over planning decisions and project implementation, and consequently a more meaningful share of the benefits of resource development. This paper explores the requirements of international standards and guidance alongside different models of benefit sharing in practice by extractive industries in Arctic and sub-Arctic contexts. It is based primarily on desk-based analysis of international hard and soft law and industry standards, while also drawing on ethnographic field research in Russia and Norway. It highlights good practice within mainstream development scenarios and identifies models of benefit sharing that represent a greater degree of Indigenous participation and control. It concludes that there is a need to consider benefit sharing within an overall paradigm that allows greater space for Indigenous voices in decision making, including at the strategic planning stage. |
format |
Article in Journal/Newspaper |
author |
Emma Wilson |
author_facet |
Emma Wilson |
author_sort |
Emma Wilson |
title |
What is Benefit Sharing? Respecting Indigenous Rights and Addressing Inequities in Arctic Resource Projects |
title_short |
What is Benefit Sharing? Respecting Indigenous Rights and Addressing Inequities in Arctic Resource Projects |
title_full |
What is Benefit Sharing? Respecting Indigenous Rights and Addressing Inequities in Arctic Resource Projects |
title_fullStr |
What is Benefit Sharing? Respecting Indigenous Rights and Addressing Inequities in Arctic Resource Projects |
title_full_unstemmed |
What is Benefit Sharing? Respecting Indigenous Rights and Addressing Inequities in Arctic Resource Projects |
title_sort |
what is benefit sharing? respecting indigenous rights and addressing inequities in arctic resource projects |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
publishDate |
2019 |
url |
https://doi.org/10.3390/resources8020074 https://doaj.org/article/fa4cdcc4b4624a9ba32644899adb2f27 |
geographic |
Arctic Norway |
geographic_facet |
Arctic Norway |
genre |
Arctic |
genre_facet |
Arctic |
op_source |
Resources, Vol 8, Iss 2, p 74 (2019) |
op_relation |
https://www.mdpi.com/2079-9276/8/2/74 https://doaj.org/toc/2079-9276 2079-9276 doi:10.3390/resources8020074 https://doaj.org/article/fa4cdcc4b4624a9ba32644899adb2f27 |
op_doi |
https://doi.org/10.3390/resources8020074 |
container_title |
Resources |
container_volume |
8 |
container_issue |
2 |
container_start_page |
74 |
_version_ |
1766319276383272960 |