Do Domestic Dogs ( Canis lupus familiaris ) Perceive Numerosity Illusions?

Recent studies have showed that domestic dogs are only scantly susceptible to visual illusions, suggesting that the perceptual mechanisms might be different in humans and dogs. However, to date, none of these studies have utilized illusions that are linked to quantity discrimination. In the current...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Animals
Main Authors: Miina Lõoke, Lieta Marinelli, Carla Jade Eatherington, Christian Agrillo, Paolo Mongillo
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10122304
https://doaj.org/article/f585587c198f43c5a0c996350a2cd1a9
_version_ 1821487880018591744
author Miina Lõoke
Lieta Marinelli
Carla Jade Eatherington
Christian Agrillo
Paolo Mongillo
author_facet Miina Lõoke
Lieta Marinelli
Carla Jade Eatherington
Christian Agrillo
Paolo Mongillo
author_sort Miina Lõoke
collection Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles
container_issue 12
container_start_page 2304
container_title Animals
container_volume 10
description Recent studies have showed that domestic dogs are only scantly susceptible to visual illusions, suggesting that the perceptual mechanisms might be different in humans and dogs. However, to date, none of these studies have utilized illusions that are linked to quantity discrimination. In the current study, we tested whether dogs are susceptible to a linear version of the Solitaire illusion, a robust numerosity illusion experienced by most humans. In the first experiment, we tested dogs’ ability to discriminate items in a 0.67 and 0.75 numerical ratio. The results showed that dogs’ quantity discrimination abilities fall in between these two ratios. In Experiment 2, we presented the dogs with the Solitaire illusion pattern using a spontaneous procedure. No evidence supporting any numerosity misperception was found. This conclusion was replicated in Experiment 3, where we manipulated dogs’ initial experience with the stimuli and their contrast with the background. The lack of dogs’ susceptibility to the Solitaire illusion suggests that numerical estimation of dogs is not influenced by the spatial arrangement of the items to be enumerated. In view of the existing evidence, the effect may be extended to dogs’ quantitative abilities at large.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
genre Canis lupus
genre_facet Canis lupus
id ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:f585587c198f43c5a0c996350a2cd1a9
institution Open Polar
language English
op_collection_id ftdoajarticles
op_doi https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10122304
op_relation https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2615/10/12/2304
https://doaj.org/toc/2076-2615
doi:10.3390/ani10122304
2076-2615
https://doaj.org/article/f585587c198f43c5a0c996350a2cd1a9
op_source Animals, Vol 10, Iss 2304, p 2304 (2020)
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI AG
record_format openpolar
spelling ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:f585587c198f43c5a0c996350a2cd1a9 2025-01-16T21:25:52+00:00 Do Domestic Dogs ( Canis lupus familiaris ) Perceive Numerosity Illusions? Miina Lõoke Lieta Marinelli Carla Jade Eatherington Christian Agrillo Paolo Mongillo 2020-12-01T00:00:00Z https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10122304 https://doaj.org/article/f585587c198f43c5a0c996350a2cd1a9 EN eng MDPI AG https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2615/10/12/2304 https://doaj.org/toc/2076-2615 doi:10.3390/ani10122304 2076-2615 https://doaj.org/article/f585587c198f43c5a0c996350a2cd1a9 Animals, Vol 10, Iss 2304, p 2304 (2020) quantity dog numerical cognition gestalt illusion vision Veterinary medicine SF600-1100 Zoology QL1-991 article 2020 ftdoajarticles https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10122304 2022-12-31T04:50:49Z Recent studies have showed that domestic dogs are only scantly susceptible to visual illusions, suggesting that the perceptual mechanisms might be different in humans and dogs. However, to date, none of these studies have utilized illusions that are linked to quantity discrimination. In the current study, we tested whether dogs are susceptible to a linear version of the Solitaire illusion, a robust numerosity illusion experienced by most humans. In the first experiment, we tested dogs’ ability to discriminate items in a 0.67 and 0.75 numerical ratio. The results showed that dogs’ quantity discrimination abilities fall in between these two ratios. In Experiment 2, we presented the dogs with the Solitaire illusion pattern using a spontaneous procedure. No evidence supporting any numerosity misperception was found. This conclusion was replicated in Experiment 3, where we manipulated dogs’ initial experience with the stimuli and their contrast with the background. The lack of dogs’ susceptibility to the Solitaire illusion suggests that numerical estimation of dogs is not influenced by the spatial arrangement of the items to be enumerated. In view of the existing evidence, the effect may be extended to dogs’ quantitative abilities at large. Article in Journal/Newspaper Canis lupus Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles Animals 10 12 2304
spellingShingle quantity
dog
numerical cognition
gestalt
illusion
vision
Veterinary medicine
SF600-1100
Zoology
QL1-991
Miina Lõoke
Lieta Marinelli
Carla Jade Eatherington
Christian Agrillo
Paolo Mongillo
Do Domestic Dogs ( Canis lupus familiaris ) Perceive Numerosity Illusions?
title Do Domestic Dogs ( Canis lupus familiaris ) Perceive Numerosity Illusions?
title_full Do Domestic Dogs ( Canis lupus familiaris ) Perceive Numerosity Illusions?
title_fullStr Do Domestic Dogs ( Canis lupus familiaris ) Perceive Numerosity Illusions?
title_full_unstemmed Do Domestic Dogs ( Canis lupus familiaris ) Perceive Numerosity Illusions?
title_short Do Domestic Dogs ( Canis lupus familiaris ) Perceive Numerosity Illusions?
title_sort do domestic dogs ( canis lupus familiaris ) perceive numerosity illusions?
topic quantity
dog
numerical cognition
gestalt
illusion
vision
Veterinary medicine
SF600-1100
Zoology
QL1-991
topic_facet quantity
dog
numerical cognition
gestalt
illusion
vision
Veterinary medicine
SF600-1100
Zoology
QL1-991
url https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10122304
https://doaj.org/article/f585587c198f43c5a0c996350a2cd1a9