Local and Remote Controls on Arctic Mixed‐Layer Evolution

• Published in: Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems
• Main Authors: R. A. J. Neggers, J. Chylik, U. Egerer, H. Griesche, V. Schemann, P. Seifert, H. Siebert, A. Macke
• Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
• Language: English
• Published: American Geophysical Union (AGU) 2019
• Subjects: large‐eddy simulation; Arctic mixed‐phase clouds; warm air intrusions; large‐scale subsidence; Arctic mixed layers; Polarstern research Vessel; Physical geography; GB3-5030; Oceanography; GC1-1581; Arctic
• Online Access: https://doi.org/10.1029/2019MS001671; https://doaj.org/article/f5777a505c4b4988a0c101f500655459

Abstract In this study Lagrangian large‐eddy simulation of cloudy mixed layers in evolving warm air masses in the Arctic is constrained by in situ observations from the recent PASCAL field campaign. A key novelty is that time dependence is maintained in the large‐scale forcings. An iterative procedure featuring large‐eddy simulation on microgrids is explored to calibrate the case setup, inspired by and making use of the typically long memory of Arctic air masses for upstream conditions. The simulated mixed‐phase clouds are part of a turbulent mixed layer that is weakly coupled to the surface and is occasionally capped by a shallow humidity layer. All eight simulated mixed layers exhibit a strong time evolution across a range of time scales, including diurnal but also synoptic fingerprints. A few cases experience rapid cloud collapse, coinciding with a rapid decrease in mixed‐layer depth. To gain insight, composite budget analyses are performed. In the mixed‐layer interior the heat and moisture budgets are dominated by turbulent transport, radiative cooling, and precipitation. However, near the thermal inversion the large‐scale vertical advection also contributes significantly, showing a distinct difference between subsidence and upsidence conditions. A bulk mass budget analysis reveals that entrainment deepening behaves almost time‐constantly, as long as clouds are present. In contrast, large‐scale subsidence fluctuates much more strongly and can both counteract and boost boundary‐layer deepening resulting from entrainment. Strong and sudden subsidence events following prolonged deepening periods are found to cause the cloud collapses, associated with a substantial reduction in the surface downward longwave radiative flux.