Hydrologic Controls on Peat Permafrost and Carbon Processes: New Insights From Past and Future Modeling

Soil carbon (C) in permafrost peatlands is vulnerable to decomposition with thaw under a warming climate. The amount and form of C loss likely depends on the site hydrology following permafrost thaw, but antecedent conditions during peat accumulation are also likely important. We test the role of di...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Frontiers in Environmental Science
Main Authors: Claire C. Treat, Miriam C. Jones, Jay Alder, Steve Frolking
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2022.892925
https://doaj.org/article/f5207dd78f8a4ef9a0d17c618d8ef295
id ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:f5207dd78f8a4ef9a0d17c618d8ef295
record_format openpolar
spelling ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:f5207dd78f8a4ef9a0d17c618d8ef295 2023-05-15T15:11:44+02:00 Hydrologic Controls on Peat Permafrost and Carbon Processes: New Insights From Past and Future Modeling Claire C. Treat Miriam C. Jones Jay Alder Steve Frolking 2022-05-01T00:00:00Z https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2022.892925 https://doaj.org/article/f5207dd78f8a4ef9a0d17c618d8ef295 EN eng Frontiers Media S.A. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2022.892925/full https://doaj.org/toc/2296-665X 2296-665X doi:10.3389/fenvs.2022.892925 https://doaj.org/article/f5207dd78f8a4ef9a0d17c618d8ef295 Frontiers in Environmental Science, Vol 10 (2022) permafrost peatlands and wetlands tundra peat accumulation Holocene ecological modeling Environmental sciences GE1-350 article 2022 ftdoajarticles https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2022.892925 2022-12-30T21:26:30Z Soil carbon (C) in permafrost peatlands is vulnerable to decomposition with thaw under a warming climate. The amount and form of C loss likely depends on the site hydrology following permafrost thaw, but antecedent conditions during peat accumulation are also likely important. We test the role of differing hydrologic conditions on rates of peat accumulation, permafrost formation, and response to warming at an Arctic tundra fen using a process-based model of peatland dynamics in wet and dry landscape settings that persist from peat initiation in the mid-Holocene through future simulations to 2100 CE and 2300 CE. Climate conditions for both the wet and dry landscape settings are driven by the same downscaled TraCE-21ka transient paleoclimate simulations and CCSM4 RCP8.5 climate drivers. The landscape setting controlled the rates of peat accumulation, permafrost formation and the response to climatic warming and permafrost thaw. The dry landscape scenario had high rates of initial peat accumulation (11.7 ± 3.4 mm decade−1) and rapid permafrost aggradation but similar total C stocks as the wet landscape scenario. The wet landscape scenario was more resilient to 21st century warming temperatures than the dry landscape scenario and showed 60% smaller C losses and 70% more new net peat C additions by 2100 CE. Differences in the modeled responses indicate the largest effect is related to the landscape setting and basin hydrology due to permafrost controls on decomposition, suggesting an important sensitivity to changing runoff patterns. These subtle hydrological effects will be difficult to capture at circumpolar scales but are important for the carbon balance of permafrost peatlands under future climate warming. Article in Journal/Newspaper Arctic permafrost Tundra Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles Arctic Frontiers in Environmental Science 10
institution Open Polar
collection Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles
op_collection_id ftdoajarticles
language English
topic permafrost
peatlands and wetlands
tundra
peat accumulation
Holocene
ecological modeling
Environmental sciences
GE1-350
spellingShingle permafrost
peatlands and wetlands
tundra
peat accumulation
Holocene
ecological modeling
Environmental sciences
GE1-350
Claire C. Treat
Miriam C. Jones
Jay Alder
Steve Frolking
Hydrologic Controls on Peat Permafrost and Carbon Processes: New Insights From Past and Future Modeling
topic_facet permafrost
peatlands and wetlands
tundra
peat accumulation
Holocene
ecological modeling
Environmental sciences
GE1-350
description Soil carbon (C) in permafrost peatlands is vulnerable to decomposition with thaw under a warming climate. The amount and form of C loss likely depends on the site hydrology following permafrost thaw, but antecedent conditions during peat accumulation are also likely important. We test the role of differing hydrologic conditions on rates of peat accumulation, permafrost formation, and response to warming at an Arctic tundra fen using a process-based model of peatland dynamics in wet and dry landscape settings that persist from peat initiation in the mid-Holocene through future simulations to 2100 CE and 2300 CE. Climate conditions for both the wet and dry landscape settings are driven by the same downscaled TraCE-21ka transient paleoclimate simulations and CCSM4 RCP8.5 climate drivers. The landscape setting controlled the rates of peat accumulation, permafrost formation and the response to climatic warming and permafrost thaw. The dry landscape scenario had high rates of initial peat accumulation (11.7 ± 3.4 mm decade−1) and rapid permafrost aggradation but similar total C stocks as the wet landscape scenario. The wet landscape scenario was more resilient to 21st century warming temperatures than the dry landscape scenario and showed 60% smaller C losses and 70% more new net peat C additions by 2100 CE. Differences in the modeled responses indicate the largest effect is related to the landscape setting and basin hydrology due to permafrost controls on decomposition, suggesting an important sensitivity to changing runoff patterns. These subtle hydrological effects will be difficult to capture at circumpolar scales but are important for the carbon balance of permafrost peatlands under future climate warming.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Claire C. Treat
Miriam C. Jones
Jay Alder
Steve Frolking
author_facet Claire C. Treat
Miriam C. Jones
Jay Alder
Steve Frolking
author_sort Claire C. Treat
title Hydrologic Controls on Peat Permafrost and Carbon Processes: New Insights From Past and Future Modeling
title_short Hydrologic Controls on Peat Permafrost and Carbon Processes: New Insights From Past and Future Modeling
title_full Hydrologic Controls on Peat Permafrost and Carbon Processes: New Insights From Past and Future Modeling
title_fullStr Hydrologic Controls on Peat Permafrost and Carbon Processes: New Insights From Past and Future Modeling
title_full_unstemmed Hydrologic Controls on Peat Permafrost and Carbon Processes: New Insights From Past and Future Modeling
title_sort hydrologic controls on peat permafrost and carbon processes: new insights from past and future modeling
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
publishDate 2022
url https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2022.892925
https://doaj.org/article/f5207dd78f8a4ef9a0d17c618d8ef295
geographic Arctic
geographic_facet Arctic
genre Arctic
permafrost
Tundra
genre_facet Arctic
permafrost
Tundra
op_source Frontiers in Environmental Science, Vol 10 (2022)
op_relation https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2022.892925/full
https://doaj.org/toc/2296-665X
2296-665X
doi:10.3389/fenvs.2022.892925
https://doaj.org/article/f5207dd78f8a4ef9a0d17c618d8ef295
op_doi https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2022.892925
container_title Frontiers in Environmental Science
container_volume 10
_version_ 1766342547014156288