POST-VACCINATION IMMUNITY IN ARCTIC FOXES VACCINATED AGAINST SALMONELLA

Combating salmonellosis has always been an important task. This infection has been widespread among farm and fur animals, as well as poultry, and tends to be on a rise lately. Furthermore, 85 % of animals continue to carry the bacteria after recovery. Salmonellosis outbreaks are registered among fur...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Proceedings of the Karelian Research Centre of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Main Authors: Iraida Okulova, Igor Domsky, Yulia Berezina, Zinaida Bel’tyukova, Maria Koshurnikova
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Russian
Published: Karelian Research Centre of the Russian Academy of Sciences 2020
Subjects:
opa
Q
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.17076/eb1126
https://doaj.org/article/f38b3e732d2743d695d71e7d74016460
id ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:f38b3e732d2743d695d71e7d74016460
record_format openpolar
spelling ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:f38b3e732d2743d695d71e7d74016460 2023-05-15T14:53:02+02:00 POST-VACCINATION IMMUNITY IN ARCTIC FOXES VACCINATED AGAINST SALMONELLA Iraida Okulova Igor Domsky Yulia Berezina Zinaida Bel’tyukova Maria Koshurnikova 2020-04-01T00:00:00Z https://doi.org/10.17076/eb1126 https://doaj.org/article/f38b3e732d2743d695d71e7d74016460 EN RU eng rus Karelian Research Centre of the Russian Academy of Sciences http://journals.krc.karelia.ru/index.php/biology/article/view/1126 https://doaj.org/toc/1997-3217 https://doaj.org/toc/2312-4504 1997-3217 2312-4504 doi:10.17076/eb1126 https://doaj.org/article/f38b3e732d2743d695d71e7d74016460 Transactions of the Karelian Research Centre of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Iss 3, Pp 95-105 (2020) inactivated vaccine opa e- and eac-rosette formation submandibular lymph nodes spleen immunoblasts proplasmocytes plasmocytes Science Q article 2020 ftdoajarticles https://doi.org/10.17076/eb1126 2022-12-31T02:41:58Z Combating salmonellosis has always been an important task. This infection has been widespread among farm and fur animals, as well as poultry, and tends to be on a rise lately. Furthermore, 85 % of animals continue to carry the bacteria after recovery. Salmonellosis outbreaks are registered among fur animals from early April to late September. In some farms, mortality is up to 30 %. As a result, epizootic hotbeds of salmonella infection are persistent. It is therefore important to take timely and specific actions to prevent, reduce and eliminate animal losses to salmonellosis. The inactivated salmonellosis vaccines used until lately proved to be not very effective. Vaccination of animals induces complex structural and functional changes in the immune system organs. Repeated administration of the drug, as instructed, turns immunization into a lengthy and laborious process. This study was carried out with cage-reared Arctic foxes treated with inactivated vaccine. Animals in the experimental group were vaccinated with an associated inactivated vaccine against colibacillosis, salmonella, klebsiella and protozoa infections manufactured by the Pokrovsky Biologics Plant and LLC AgroVet (vaccine OKZ TU- 9384‑047‑00008064‑99). The animals were vaccinated subcutaneously twice with an interval of 14 days according to the instruction for the drug. Animals in the control group were not vaccinated. After the scheduled slaughter of cage-reared Arctic foxes, 5 animals from each group in their 7th, 14th, 21st, and 28th days after vaccination were taken. Their spleens and submandibular lymph nodes were extracted for histological examination and fixed in 10% aqueous solution of neutral formalin. Cellular immunity was assessed using opsonophagocytic assay (OPA), E- and EAC-rosette formation, and agglutination test. Morphological and morphometric measurements of the peripheral immune organs were taken. Spleen tissue sections from vaccinated Arctic foxes had red and white pulp clearly visible during histological examination. ... Article in Journal/Newspaper Arctic Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles Arctic Slaughter ENVELOPE(-85.633,-85.633,-78.617,-78.617) Proceedings of the Karelian Research Centre of the Russian Academy of Sciences 3 95
institution Open Polar
collection Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles
op_collection_id ftdoajarticles
language English
Russian
topic inactivated vaccine
opa
e- and eac-rosette formation
submandibular lymph nodes
spleen
immunoblasts
proplasmocytes
plasmocytes
Science
Q
spellingShingle inactivated vaccine
opa
e- and eac-rosette formation
submandibular lymph nodes
spleen
immunoblasts
proplasmocytes
plasmocytes
Science
Q
Iraida Okulova
Igor Domsky
Yulia Berezina
Zinaida Bel’tyukova
Maria Koshurnikova
POST-VACCINATION IMMUNITY IN ARCTIC FOXES VACCINATED AGAINST SALMONELLA
topic_facet inactivated vaccine
opa
e- and eac-rosette formation
submandibular lymph nodes
spleen
immunoblasts
proplasmocytes
plasmocytes
Science
Q
description Combating salmonellosis has always been an important task. This infection has been widespread among farm and fur animals, as well as poultry, and tends to be on a rise lately. Furthermore, 85 % of animals continue to carry the bacteria after recovery. Salmonellosis outbreaks are registered among fur animals from early April to late September. In some farms, mortality is up to 30 %. As a result, epizootic hotbeds of salmonella infection are persistent. It is therefore important to take timely and specific actions to prevent, reduce and eliminate animal losses to salmonellosis. The inactivated salmonellosis vaccines used until lately proved to be not very effective. Vaccination of animals induces complex structural and functional changes in the immune system organs. Repeated administration of the drug, as instructed, turns immunization into a lengthy and laborious process. This study was carried out with cage-reared Arctic foxes treated with inactivated vaccine. Animals in the experimental group were vaccinated with an associated inactivated vaccine against colibacillosis, salmonella, klebsiella and protozoa infections manufactured by the Pokrovsky Biologics Plant and LLC AgroVet (vaccine OKZ TU- 9384‑047‑00008064‑99). The animals were vaccinated subcutaneously twice with an interval of 14 days according to the instruction for the drug. Animals in the control group were not vaccinated. After the scheduled slaughter of cage-reared Arctic foxes, 5 animals from each group in their 7th, 14th, 21st, and 28th days after vaccination were taken. Their spleens and submandibular lymph nodes were extracted for histological examination and fixed in 10% aqueous solution of neutral formalin. Cellular immunity was assessed using opsonophagocytic assay (OPA), E- and EAC-rosette formation, and agglutination test. Morphological and morphometric measurements of the peripheral immune organs were taken. Spleen tissue sections from vaccinated Arctic foxes had red and white pulp clearly visible during histological examination. ...
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Iraida Okulova
Igor Domsky
Yulia Berezina
Zinaida Bel’tyukova
Maria Koshurnikova
author_facet Iraida Okulova
Igor Domsky
Yulia Berezina
Zinaida Bel’tyukova
Maria Koshurnikova
author_sort Iraida Okulova
title POST-VACCINATION IMMUNITY IN ARCTIC FOXES VACCINATED AGAINST SALMONELLA
title_short POST-VACCINATION IMMUNITY IN ARCTIC FOXES VACCINATED AGAINST SALMONELLA
title_full POST-VACCINATION IMMUNITY IN ARCTIC FOXES VACCINATED AGAINST SALMONELLA
title_fullStr POST-VACCINATION IMMUNITY IN ARCTIC FOXES VACCINATED AGAINST SALMONELLA
title_full_unstemmed POST-VACCINATION IMMUNITY IN ARCTIC FOXES VACCINATED AGAINST SALMONELLA
title_sort post-vaccination immunity in arctic foxes vaccinated against salmonella
publisher Karelian Research Centre of the Russian Academy of Sciences
publishDate 2020
url https://doi.org/10.17076/eb1126
https://doaj.org/article/f38b3e732d2743d695d71e7d74016460
long_lat ENVELOPE(-85.633,-85.633,-78.617,-78.617)
geographic Arctic
Slaughter
geographic_facet Arctic
Slaughter
genre Arctic
genre_facet Arctic
op_source Transactions of the Karelian Research Centre of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Iss 3, Pp 95-105 (2020)
op_relation http://journals.krc.karelia.ru/index.php/biology/article/view/1126
https://doaj.org/toc/1997-3217
https://doaj.org/toc/2312-4504
1997-3217
2312-4504
doi:10.17076/eb1126
https://doaj.org/article/f38b3e732d2743d695d71e7d74016460
op_doi https://doi.org/10.17076/eb1126
container_title Proceedings of the Karelian Research Centre of the Russian Academy of Sciences
container_issue 3
container_start_page 95
_version_ 1766324459512266752