Indigenous peoples in the context of cultural continuity
The article defines local and global rather as two complementary perspectives for interpreting the modernity than as two levels of social interaction - micro- and macro-. Following Latour’s new ‘anthropological matrix’ the author shows the way to move from local to global, from representations of cu...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
Language: | English Russian |
Published: |
Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University)
2016
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doaj.org/article/f0631a37fcc54d2b9c2d6c7d9df0aa00 |
id |
ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:f0631a37fcc54d2b9c2d6c7d9df0aa00 |
---|---|
record_format |
openpolar |
spelling |
ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:f0631a37fcc54d2b9c2d6c7d9df0aa00 2023-05-15T18:47:18+02:00 Indigenous peoples in the context of cultural continuity M S Kuropjatnik 2016-12-01T00:00:00Z https://doaj.org/article/f0631a37fcc54d2b9c2d6c7d9df0aa00 EN RU eng rus Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University) http://journals.rudn.ru/sociology/article/view/14809 https://doaj.org/toc/2313-2272 https://doaj.org/toc/2408-8897 2313-2272 2408-8897 https://doaj.org/article/f0631a37fcc54d2b9c2d6c7d9df0aa00 RUDN journal of Sociology, Vol 16, Iss 4, Pp 769-776 (2016) локальное и глобальное культура коренных народов культурная непрерывность практики перевода этнографическое самоописание глобализация идентичность культурная антропология саамы Кольского полуострова Sociology (General) HM401-1281 article 2016 ftdoajarticles 2022-12-31T12:49:41Z The article defines local and global rather as two complementary perspectives for interpreting the modernity than as two levels of social interaction - micro- and macro-. Following Latour’s new ‘anthropological matrix’ the author shows the way to move from local to global, from representations of cultural forms as authentic (premodern) to their modern interpretations. Cultural continuity is understood as a consequence of the implementation of a multiple ‘partial inclusions’, and as an outcome of the combination of multiple transitions from local to global, from inner context to the outer. One of the most important modes of this continuity constitution is the practice of translation. Regarding indigenous peoples we can speak of two collections of translation practices such as translation of oral-discursive experience of culture into the text, and a reverse translation of cultural narratives created in their being non-literate peoples. Practices of reverse translation consist of the transformation of the ideas initially formed in the outside contexts into the context of the indigenous people’s culture. Such cultural forms as ethnographic self-descriptions are important not only to identify the actual cultural references of the indigenous peoples but also in terms of their involvement in the production of new cultural reality. Article in Journal/Newspaper Саамы Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles |
institution |
Open Polar |
collection |
Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles |
op_collection_id |
ftdoajarticles |
language |
English Russian |
topic |
локальное и глобальное культура коренных народов культурная непрерывность практики перевода этнографическое самоописание глобализация идентичность культурная антропология саамы Кольского полуострова Sociology (General) HM401-1281 |
spellingShingle |
локальное и глобальное культура коренных народов культурная непрерывность практики перевода этнографическое самоописание глобализация идентичность культурная антропология саамы Кольского полуострова Sociology (General) HM401-1281 M S Kuropjatnik Indigenous peoples in the context of cultural continuity |
topic_facet |
локальное и глобальное культура коренных народов культурная непрерывность практики перевода этнографическое самоописание глобализация идентичность культурная антропология саамы Кольского полуострова Sociology (General) HM401-1281 |
description |
The article defines local and global rather as two complementary perspectives for interpreting the modernity than as two levels of social interaction - micro- and macro-. Following Latour’s new ‘anthropological matrix’ the author shows the way to move from local to global, from representations of cultural forms as authentic (premodern) to their modern interpretations. Cultural continuity is understood as a consequence of the implementation of a multiple ‘partial inclusions’, and as an outcome of the combination of multiple transitions from local to global, from inner context to the outer. One of the most important modes of this continuity constitution is the practice of translation. Regarding indigenous peoples we can speak of two collections of translation practices such as translation of oral-discursive experience of culture into the text, and a reverse translation of cultural narratives created in their being non-literate peoples. Practices of reverse translation consist of the transformation of the ideas initially formed in the outside contexts into the context of the indigenous people’s culture. Such cultural forms as ethnographic self-descriptions are important not only to identify the actual cultural references of the indigenous peoples but also in terms of their involvement in the production of new cultural reality. |
format |
Article in Journal/Newspaper |
author |
M S Kuropjatnik |
author_facet |
M S Kuropjatnik |
author_sort |
M S Kuropjatnik |
title |
Indigenous peoples in the context of cultural continuity |
title_short |
Indigenous peoples in the context of cultural continuity |
title_full |
Indigenous peoples in the context of cultural continuity |
title_fullStr |
Indigenous peoples in the context of cultural continuity |
title_full_unstemmed |
Indigenous peoples in the context of cultural continuity |
title_sort |
indigenous peoples in the context of cultural continuity |
publisher |
Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University) |
publishDate |
2016 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/f0631a37fcc54d2b9c2d6c7d9df0aa00 |
genre |
Саамы |
genre_facet |
Саамы |
op_source |
RUDN journal of Sociology, Vol 16, Iss 4, Pp 769-776 (2016) |
op_relation |
http://journals.rudn.ru/sociology/article/view/14809 https://doaj.org/toc/2313-2272 https://doaj.org/toc/2408-8897 2313-2272 2408-8897 https://doaj.org/article/f0631a37fcc54d2b9c2d6c7d9df0aa00 |
_version_ |
1766239260559540224 |