Indigenous peoples in the context of cultural continuity

The article defines local and global rather as two complementary perspectives for interpreting the modernity than as two levels of social interaction - micro- and macro-. Following Latour’s new ‘anthropological matrix’ the author shows the way to move from local to global, from representations of cu...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: M S Kuropjatnik
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Russian
Published: Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University) 2016
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doaj.org/article/f0631a37fcc54d2b9c2d6c7d9df0aa00
id ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:f0631a37fcc54d2b9c2d6c7d9df0aa00
record_format openpolar
spelling ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:f0631a37fcc54d2b9c2d6c7d9df0aa00 2023-05-15T18:47:18+02:00 Indigenous peoples in the context of cultural continuity M S Kuropjatnik 2016-12-01T00:00:00Z https://doaj.org/article/f0631a37fcc54d2b9c2d6c7d9df0aa00 EN RU eng rus Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University) http://journals.rudn.ru/sociology/article/view/14809 https://doaj.org/toc/2313-2272 https://doaj.org/toc/2408-8897 2313-2272 2408-8897 https://doaj.org/article/f0631a37fcc54d2b9c2d6c7d9df0aa00 RUDN journal of Sociology, Vol 16, Iss 4, Pp 769-776 (2016) локальное и глобальное культура коренных народов культурная непрерывность практики перевода этнографическое самоописание глобализация идентичность культурная антропология саамы Кольского полуострова Sociology (General) HM401-1281 article 2016 ftdoajarticles 2022-12-31T12:49:41Z The article defines local and global rather as two complementary perspectives for interpreting the modernity than as two levels of social interaction - micro- and macro-. Following Latour’s new ‘anthropological matrix’ the author shows the way to move from local to global, from representations of cultural forms as authentic (premodern) to their modern interpretations. Cultural continuity is understood as a consequence of the implementation of a multiple ‘partial inclusions’, and as an outcome of the combination of multiple transitions from local to global, from inner context to the outer. One of the most important modes of this continuity constitution is the practice of translation. Regarding indigenous peoples we can speak of two collections of translation practices such as translation of oral-discursive experience of culture into the text, and a reverse translation of cultural narratives created in their being non-literate peoples. Practices of reverse translation consist of the transformation of the ideas initially formed in the outside contexts into the context of the indigenous people’s culture. Such cultural forms as ethnographic self-descriptions are important not only to identify the actual cultural references of the indigenous peoples but also in terms of their involvement in the production of new cultural reality. Article in Journal/Newspaper Саамы Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles
institution Open Polar
collection Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles
op_collection_id ftdoajarticles
language English
Russian
topic локальное и глобальное
культура коренных народов
культурная непрерывность
практики перевода
этнографическое самоописание
глобализация
идентичность
культурная антропология
саамы Кольского полуострова
Sociology (General)
HM401-1281
spellingShingle локальное и глобальное
культура коренных народов
культурная непрерывность
практики перевода
этнографическое самоописание
глобализация
идентичность
культурная антропология
саамы Кольского полуострова
Sociology (General)
HM401-1281
M S Kuropjatnik
Indigenous peoples in the context of cultural continuity
topic_facet локальное и глобальное
культура коренных народов
культурная непрерывность
практики перевода
этнографическое самоописание
глобализация
идентичность
культурная антропология
саамы Кольского полуострова
Sociology (General)
HM401-1281
description The article defines local and global rather as two complementary perspectives for interpreting the modernity than as two levels of social interaction - micro- and macro-. Following Latour’s new ‘anthropological matrix’ the author shows the way to move from local to global, from representations of cultural forms as authentic (premodern) to their modern interpretations. Cultural continuity is understood as a consequence of the implementation of a multiple ‘partial inclusions’, and as an outcome of the combination of multiple transitions from local to global, from inner context to the outer. One of the most important modes of this continuity constitution is the practice of translation. Regarding indigenous peoples we can speak of two collections of translation practices such as translation of oral-discursive experience of culture into the text, and a reverse translation of cultural narratives created in their being non-literate peoples. Practices of reverse translation consist of the transformation of the ideas initially formed in the outside contexts into the context of the indigenous people’s culture. Such cultural forms as ethnographic self-descriptions are important not only to identify the actual cultural references of the indigenous peoples but also in terms of their involvement in the production of new cultural reality.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author M S Kuropjatnik
author_facet M S Kuropjatnik
author_sort M S Kuropjatnik
title Indigenous peoples in the context of cultural continuity
title_short Indigenous peoples in the context of cultural continuity
title_full Indigenous peoples in the context of cultural continuity
title_fullStr Indigenous peoples in the context of cultural continuity
title_full_unstemmed Indigenous peoples in the context of cultural continuity
title_sort indigenous peoples in the context of cultural continuity
publisher Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University)
publishDate 2016
url https://doaj.org/article/f0631a37fcc54d2b9c2d6c7d9df0aa00
genre Саамы
genre_facet Саамы
op_source RUDN journal of Sociology, Vol 16, Iss 4, Pp 769-776 (2016)
op_relation http://journals.rudn.ru/sociology/article/view/14809
https://doaj.org/toc/2313-2272
https://doaj.org/toc/2408-8897
2313-2272
2408-8897
https://doaj.org/article/f0631a37fcc54d2b9c2d6c7d9df0aa00
_version_ 1766239260559540224