Numerical CFD Investigation of Shortboard Surfing: Fin Design vs. Cutback Turn Performance
The surfing performance of two shortboard fin types with surface features were compared to a standard (control) fin with a smooth surface using dynamic computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations. The fins with surface features included designs with a partially grooved and serrated surface (CR),...
Published in: | Proceedings |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2020
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2020049132 https://doaj.org/article/ef1e0aec5c364e1a8473b85d778b3b51 |
id |
ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:ef1e0aec5c364e1a8473b85d778b3b51 |
---|---|
record_format |
openpolar |
spelling |
ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:ef1e0aec5c364e1a8473b85d778b3b51 2023-05-15T16:36:02+02:00 Numerical CFD Investigation of Shortboard Surfing: Fin Design vs. Cutback Turn Performance David Shormann Luca Oggiano Marc in het Panhuis 2020-06-01T00:00:00Z https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2020049132 https://doaj.org/article/ef1e0aec5c364e1a8473b85d778b3b51 EN eng MDPI AG https://www.mdpi.com/2504-3900/49/1/132 https://doaj.org/toc/2504-3900 doi:10.3390/proceedings2020049132 2504-3900 https://doaj.org/article/ef1e0aec5c364e1a8473b85d778b3b51 Proceedings, Vol 49, Iss 132, p 132 (2020) shortboard fin performance STAR-CCM+ CFD tubercled leading edge cutback maneuver passive flow control grooved surface General Works A article 2020 ftdoajarticles https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2020049132 2022-12-31T14:02:34Z The surfing performance of two shortboard fin types with surface features were compared to a standard (control) fin with a smooth surface using dynamic computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations. The fins with surface features included designs with a partially grooved and serrated surface (CR), and humpback whale-inspired fins with tubercles and other features (RW). Surfboard roll, pitch and yaw during cutback maneuvers were simulated based on field data from surfers of intermediate, expert and professional (WCT) skill level surfing on ocean waves. Sustained resultant forces relative to the rider direction were significantly different between fin types, and lowest for RW at WCT-level rotations. CFD results also revealed RW’s ability to dampen effects of turbulent flow. RW fins were always the last to stall during a turn, and always exhibited the most gradual stall. CR fins had significantly lower pre-turn drag, and the highest mean resultant forces during the turn. Overall, CR fins appear best for forward acceleration and hold on the wave, while RW fins appear best for maneuverability and stability. Article in Journal/Newspaper Humpback Whale Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles Proceedings 49 1 132 |
institution |
Open Polar |
collection |
Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles |
op_collection_id |
ftdoajarticles |
language |
English |
topic |
shortboard fin performance STAR-CCM+ CFD tubercled leading edge cutback maneuver passive flow control grooved surface General Works A |
spellingShingle |
shortboard fin performance STAR-CCM+ CFD tubercled leading edge cutback maneuver passive flow control grooved surface General Works A David Shormann Luca Oggiano Marc in het Panhuis Numerical CFD Investigation of Shortboard Surfing: Fin Design vs. Cutback Turn Performance |
topic_facet |
shortboard fin performance STAR-CCM+ CFD tubercled leading edge cutback maneuver passive flow control grooved surface General Works A |
description |
The surfing performance of two shortboard fin types with surface features were compared to a standard (control) fin with a smooth surface using dynamic computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations. The fins with surface features included designs with a partially grooved and serrated surface (CR), and humpback whale-inspired fins with tubercles and other features (RW). Surfboard roll, pitch and yaw during cutback maneuvers were simulated based on field data from surfers of intermediate, expert and professional (WCT) skill level surfing on ocean waves. Sustained resultant forces relative to the rider direction were significantly different between fin types, and lowest for RW at WCT-level rotations. CFD results also revealed RW’s ability to dampen effects of turbulent flow. RW fins were always the last to stall during a turn, and always exhibited the most gradual stall. CR fins had significantly lower pre-turn drag, and the highest mean resultant forces during the turn. Overall, CR fins appear best for forward acceleration and hold on the wave, while RW fins appear best for maneuverability and stability. |
format |
Article in Journal/Newspaper |
author |
David Shormann Luca Oggiano Marc in het Panhuis |
author_facet |
David Shormann Luca Oggiano Marc in het Panhuis |
author_sort |
David Shormann |
title |
Numerical CFD Investigation of Shortboard Surfing: Fin Design vs. Cutback Turn Performance |
title_short |
Numerical CFD Investigation of Shortboard Surfing: Fin Design vs. Cutback Turn Performance |
title_full |
Numerical CFD Investigation of Shortboard Surfing: Fin Design vs. Cutback Turn Performance |
title_fullStr |
Numerical CFD Investigation of Shortboard Surfing: Fin Design vs. Cutback Turn Performance |
title_full_unstemmed |
Numerical CFD Investigation of Shortboard Surfing: Fin Design vs. Cutback Turn Performance |
title_sort |
numerical cfd investigation of shortboard surfing: fin design vs. cutback turn performance |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
publishDate |
2020 |
url |
https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2020049132 https://doaj.org/article/ef1e0aec5c364e1a8473b85d778b3b51 |
genre |
Humpback Whale |
genre_facet |
Humpback Whale |
op_source |
Proceedings, Vol 49, Iss 132, p 132 (2020) |
op_relation |
https://www.mdpi.com/2504-3900/49/1/132 https://doaj.org/toc/2504-3900 doi:10.3390/proceedings2020049132 2504-3900 https://doaj.org/article/ef1e0aec5c364e1a8473b85d778b3b51 |
op_doi |
https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2020049132 |
container_title |
Proceedings |
container_volume |
49 |
container_issue |
1 |
container_start_page |
132 |
_version_ |
1766026348782944256 |